*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 7615
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8720 on: March 28, 2021, 10:09:57 PM »
Classic Tom. Only addressing half the post and ignoring context of how many times you declared the death of Biden's campaign despite being wrong at every juncture.  I guess I was wrong, you can lie your way out of this.

What was proven wrong, exactly? Did a court declare that Powell's witnesses were lying or misrepresenting the truth?

No. The supreme court dismissed the cases before they could start on technicalities such as standing. That is basically a null result.

That is basically saying that they didn’t have a valid legal theory.
Th*rk is the worst person on this website.

*

Offline Tumeni

  • *
  • Posts: 2604
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8721 on: March 28, 2021, 10:11:18 PM »
The supreme court dismissed the cases before they could start on technicalities such as standing. That is basically a null result.

The case must have 'started' for the court to decide whether or not it had standing to proceed. They must have considered the claimant's submission in order to decide it had no standing.

If it did not, that's a loss for the claimant submitting the case. Unless "null result" has some meaning in law that you can tell us about ...?
=============================
Not Flat. Happy to prove this, if you ask me.
=============================

Nearly all flat earthers agree the earth is not a globe.

Nearly?

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 6177
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8722 on: March 29, 2021, 04:45:56 AM »
Its probably all intentional.

Intentionally present cases with huge technicality issues(misspellings, wrong procedures, etc...) so the judge doesn't even want to waste the court's time.

People like Tom then point to it and say "See?  Proof she's right!  They won't even look at the evidence, its so powerful and would ruin democracy!".

So Powell and her ilk get to keep pedling the claims without having to also prove it in a court of law.  And Trumpers just eat it up.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline Dr Van Nostrand

  • *
  • Posts: 414
  • There may be something to this 'Matrix' stuff...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8723 on: March 29, 2021, 02:52:26 PM »
So Powell and her ilk get to keep pedling the claims without having to also prove it in a court of law.  And Trumpers just eat it up.

... and Vladimir Putin leans back in his comfy leather chair with a knowing smile.
Round Earther patiently looking for a better deal...

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 6177
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8724 on: March 29, 2021, 03:29:24 PM »
So Powell and her ilk get to keep pedling the claims without having to also prove it in a court of law.  And Trumpers just eat it up.

... and Vladimir Putin leans back in his comfy leather chair with a knowing smile.

Nah.  He's probably like "How the fuck did we lose the cold war to these morons?"
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Offline WTF_Seriously

  • *
  • Posts: 238
  • Sorry folks. The Earth is round
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8725 on: March 29, 2021, 08:17:25 PM »
So Powell and her ilk get to keep pedling the claims without having to also prove it in a court of law.  And Trumpers just eat it up.

... and Vladimir Putin leans back in his comfy leather chair with a knowing smile.

Nah.  He's probably like "How the fuck did we lose the cold war to these morons?"

Never underestimate a moron's willingness and desire to blow up all things not whitely American at any expense..
Lol "Everyone is Wrong and LiEeInG"
That is a desperate argument from a losing position. An argument from a position of strength would have positive evidence for that position.

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 7615
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8726 on: April 04, 2021, 08:59:23 PM »
Trump totally not being a grifter but using his massive fortune to fight for the average American:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/trump-donors-fume-over-fine-print-which-allowed-campaign-to-charge-their-accounts-over-and-over/
Th*rk is the worst person on this website.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 6177
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8727 on: April 04, 2021, 10:40:53 PM »
Trump totally not being a grifter but using his massive fortune to fight for the average American:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/trump-donors-fume-over-fine-print-which-allowed-campaign-to-charge-their-accounts-over-and-over/

Seems par for the course to me.  Wonder if he lost any voters....
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline Iceman

  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • where there's smoke there's wires
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #8728 on: April 05, 2021, 03:38:43 AM »