*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 7173
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3360 on: November 01, 2018, 02:44:03 PM »
I'd rather Facebook and Twitter and all social media crack down and ban nationalistic messages.

And there is the truth. People often admit it without intending to. Gopd luck in your totalitarian censorship campaign comrade.

I came here to post this.

"I can feel it, coming in the air tonight, oh lord. I've been waiting for this moment, for all my life."



"So wipe off that grin, I know where you've been, it's all been a pack of lies."

Do not post enormous pictures and irrelevant youtube videos. I've added width=200 to your post to ensure the picture remains a manageable size. Users can click the image for the full size if they desire to see it.

Re: Trump
« Reply #3361 on: November 02, 2018, 04:32:56 PM »
If you are making your claim without evidence then we can discard it without evidence.

Nearly all flat earthers agree the earth is not a globe.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3362 on: November 02, 2018, 04:58:10 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46071747

U-S-A! U-S-A!




And when Iran parades out a nuke, they'll say how America made it possible.

*

Offline Rushy

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 7173
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3363 on: November 02, 2018, 06:24:08 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46071747

U-S-A! U-S-A!
And when Iran parades out a nuke, they'll say how America made it possible.

They would have easily done the same under the now defunct Iran deal, just instead they would point out how America is both stupid and naive. The largest criticism of the Iran deal was that it didn't actually do anything to prevent nuclear development and had no "teeth" so to speak. It stipulated for inspections but only if we told Iran several weeks in advance and we were only allowed to inspect certain sites. Additionally, the inspections would be conducted by the IAEA, the very same organization that continues to find no concrete evidence of nuclear weapons in Israel. Do you believe Israel has no nuclear weapons? Do you trust the IAEA to actually find them if Iran had them? These questions should significantly impact your thoughts on how intelligent the Iran deal was.

Re: Trump
« Reply #3364 on: November 05, 2018, 02:54:47 AM »
I'd rather Facebook and Twitter and all social media crack down and ban nationalistic messages.

And there is the truth. People often admit it without intending to. Gopd luck in your totalitarian censorship campaign comrade.

I came here to post this.

"I can feel it, coming in the air tonight, oh lord. I've been waiting for this moment, for all my life."



"So wipe off that grin, I know where you've been, it's all been a pack of lies."

Do not post enormous pictures and irrelevant youtube videos. I've added width=200 to your post to ensure the picture remains a manageable size. Users can click the image for the full size if they desire to see it.

Kk no worries I'll remember.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/04/us/politics/far-right-internet-trump.html
>After Mr. Trump tweeted the “jobs, not mobs” meme, the creator of the image — a Reddit user...declined to be interviewed unless The New York Times paid him $200 an hour for his “memetic warfare consulting” services

What a madlad.

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 5868
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3365 on: November 09, 2018, 05:11:37 PM »
Fucking people losing their minds because Sarah Sanders tweeted a video of Jim Acosta at a lower frame rate.  The absolute state of American politics.
You don't get races of anything ... accept people.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3366 on: November 09, 2018, 05:25:13 PM »
Fucking people losing their minds because Sarah Sanders tweeted a video of Jim Acosta at a lower frame rate.  The absolute state of American politics.
Is that the video that InfoWars "adjusted"?  Or something else?

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 5868
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3367 on: November 09, 2018, 05:27:49 PM »
Fucking people losing their minds because Sarah Sanders tweeted a video of Jim Acosta at a lower frame rate.  The absolute state of American politics.
Is that the video that InfoWars "adjusted"?  Or something else?

I looked at Euronews and Washington Post's side by side comparison. In both I saw nothing except more movement blur which suggest to me that frames have been dropped, or that the tweeted version had been compressed.   The doctored narrative seems absurd.
You don't get races of anything ... accept people.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3368 on: November 09, 2018, 07:12:36 PM »
Fucking people losing their minds because Sarah Sanders tweeted a video of Jim Acosta at a lower frame rate.  The absolute state of American politics.
Is that the video that InfoWars "adjusted"?  Or something else?

I looked at Euronews and Washington Post's side by side comparison. In both I saw nothing except more movement blur which suggest to me that frames have been dropped, or that the tweeted version had been compressed.   The doctored narrative seems absurd.


Audio was removed and a section sped up. Tge audio, as I heard, was basically a polite 'excuse me'.  But I have not seen it.

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 5868
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3369 on: November 09, 2018, 07:14:50 PM »
Fucking people losing their minds because Sarah Sanders tweeted a video of Jim Acosta at a lower frame rate.  The absolute state of American politics.
Is that the video that InfoWars "adjusted"?  Or something else?

I looked at Euronews and Washington Post's side by side comparison. In both I saw nothing except more movement blur which suggest to me that frames have been dropped, or that the tweeted version had been compressed.   The doctored narrative seems absurd.


Audio was removed and a section sped up. Tge audio, as I heard, was basically a polite 'excuse me'.  But I have not seen it.

Yeah, thats right.  Yet people are behaving as if they have been caught faking the moon landing.
You don't get races of anything ... accept people.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3370 on: November 09, 2018, 08:17:42 PM »
Fucking people losing their minds because Sarah Sanders tweeted a video of Jim Acosta at a lower frame rate.  The absolute state of American politics.
Is that the video that InfoWars "adjusted"?  Or something else?

I looked at Euronews and Washington Post's side by side comparison. In both I saw nothing except more movement blur which suggest to me that frames have been dropped, or that the tweeted version had been compressed.   The doctored narrative seems absurd.


Audio was removed and a section sped up. Tge audio, as I heard, was basically a polite 'excuse me'.  But I have not seen it.

Yeah, thats right.  Yet people are behaving as if they have been caught faking the moon landing.
Maybe so but let's face it, faking or posting a fake anything from an official US account is pretty bad.
Also, didn't he use it as justification to ban him?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2018, 08:20:41 PM by Lord Dave »

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 5868
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3371 on: November 09, 2018, 08:24:17 PM »
It's not faked and no that event is not why his credential was revoked.
You don't get races of anything ... accept people.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3372 on: November 09, 2018, 09:08:55 PM »
It's not faked and no that event is not why his credential was revoked.
Well doctored anyway.  Subtly but enough to show him in a negative light.

Then why was his credentials revoked?

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 5868
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3373 on: November 09, 2018, 09:42:20 PM »
Has it been doctored?  I’ve seen experts say yes and say no. If it was doctored, for what purpose was it doctored? Perhaps it was a result of a reformat to make it tweetable. It seems unlikely that they thought it would show Jim Acosta to be a woman beater.

He had his credentials revoked for “his challenging questions” (meaning antagonistic).
You don't get races of anything ... accept people.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3374 on: November 09, 2018, 10:50:10 PM »
Has it been doctored?  I’ve seen experts say yes and say no. If it was doctored, for what purpose was it doctored? Perhaps it was a result of a reformat to make it tweetable. It seems unlikely that they thought it would show Jim Acosta to be a woman beater.

He had his credentials revoked for “his challenging questions” (meaning antagonistic).
As I understand:
A segment of audio (the politeness) was removed.The bit where he was pushing past was sped up to make it look like he was more aggressive.
It was from InfoWars.

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 5868
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3375 on: November 09, 2018, 11:18:09 PM »
Has it been removed?  What file did they get the video from? I don't know. The fact that this is becoming some giant deal is ridiculous.
You don't get races of anything ... accept people.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3376 on: November 10, 2018, 06:51:40 AM »
Has it been removed?  What file did they get the video from? I don't know. The fact that this is becoming some giant deal is ridiculous.
http://time.com/5449401/jim-acosta-cnn-trump-video/

Here is a time article about it.  Shows both the original footage and the tweet from Sanders.


It's worse than I thought .I figured it was a guy moving past a woman but nope, woman standing up next to guy and taking the mic. 
« Last Edit: November 10, 2018, 08:43:08 AM by Lord Dave »

*

Online Rama Set

  • *
  • Posts: 5868
  • Round and round...
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3377 on: November 10, 2018, 07:51:41 AM »
No link.
You don't get races of anything ... accept people.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5312
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3378 on: November 10, 2018, 08:43:47 AM »
Sorry, thought I put it in.


Its in now

Re: Trump
« Reply #3379 on: November 10, 2018, 09:11:13 AM »
Sorry, thought I put it in.


Its in now

Was I watching the Acosta show? What a dick. Constantly interrupting the presidents responses and would not shut up even when the president tried to move on to another person. It seemed he was given plenty of time but just thought to whine on and on

Good on Trump for calling this moron out and I don't blame him from revoking his access.

The journo should be asking questions, not debating the president