There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?

(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)

geckothegeek

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2016, 10:43:30 PM »
There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?

(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)

Tom Bishop is rhe FE expert.

*

Offline rabinoz

  • *
  • Posts: 1441
  • Just look South at the Stars
    • View Profile
Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2016, 12:03:25 AM »
There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?
(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)
Intikam doesn't "trying to defend the flat earth theory", he just states "Intikam FACTS" with "no correspondence will be entered into".

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2016, 01:41:35 AM »
I do hope to see others. I like the actual debate, even though we'll probably always disagree. Inti takes that away. With him, either you agree, or you're "disrespecting" him.
Occasional poster, frequent observer.
Round Earth.

RE is a complex theory of simple answers.
FE is a simple theory of complex answers.


Also ignoring intikam.

İntikam

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2016, 06:45:59 AM »
Who wrote what?



Who cares.  :)



*

Offline Rounder

  • *
  • Posts: 779
  • What in the Sam Hill are you people talking about?
    • View Profile
Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2016, 10:47:11 AM »
There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?

(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)

Maybe they (flat earthers) are hoping Intikam will tire of his crusade and go away, so they can have their website back.

Or maybe we've convinced them, all of a sudden.
Proud member of İntikam's "Ignore List"
Ok. You proven you are unworthy to unignored. You proven it was a bad idea to unignore you. and it was for me a disgusting experience...Now you are going to place where you deserved and accustomed.
Quote from: SexWarrior
You accuse {FE} people of malice where incompetence suffice

geckothegeek

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2016, 07:18:22 PM »
There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?

(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)

Maybe they (flat earthers) are hoping Intikam will tire of his crusade and go away, so they can have their website back.

Or maybe we've convinced them, all of a sudden.

Even if you convinced them, they would never admit it.

I once worked for a company that shut down for several weeks every  year for everyone to take a vacation. Maybe all of the flat earthers are away on a vacatiion ?
I would hope some of them are taking a cruise to see the ice wall. Maybe some of them will bring back some pictures of it. Or some pictures of the non-horizon which is "an indistinct blur which fades away in an infinite distance."
« Last Edit: July 01, 2016, 07:28:17 PM by geckothegeek »

*

Offline rabinoz

  • *
  • Posts: 1441
  • Just look South at the Stars
    • View Profile
Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2016, 09:05:35 PM »
There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?

(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)

Maybe they (flat earthers) are hoping Intikam will tire of his crusade and go away, so they can have their website back.

Or maybe we've convinced them, all of a sudden.

Even if you convinced them, they would never admit it.

I once worked for a company that shut down for several weeks every  year for everyone to take a vacation. Maybe all of the flat earthers are away on a vacatiion ?
I would hope some of them are taking a cruise to see the ice wall. Maybe some of them will bring back some pictures of it. Or some pictures of the non-horizon which is "an indistinct blur which fades away in an infinite distance."
They are probably down Antarctica way proving that the South Pole does not get a midnight sun all summer.

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2016, 07:57:11 PM »
There has been a distinct lack of flat earthers trying to defend the flat earth theory on this forum lately. Are there any out there with evidence for a flat earth that hasn't been recently debunked?

(Intikam doesn't count, obviously)

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2016, 08:27:36 PM »
ok then globe earthers the circumference of the earth with your measurements e.g. 24,901miles with a radius of 3,959miles the curvature Equation of a ball earth with mainstream science measurements 8 inches per mile multiplied by the distance squared miles.example 8 inches x 50miles ^2       8 inches x 2500=20000 inches /12feet =1666feet meaning there should be 1666feet of curvature along the distance of 50 miles 60 miles=2400feet of curvature
70 miles =3266feet of curvature
80miles = 4256 feet of curvature
90 miles = 5400 feet of curvature
100 miles = 6666 feet of curvature
So taking mainstream science calculations into account the salt flats of Bolivia are 100 miles in length by about 80 miles in width so take into account the measurements of the earth then at 100 miles the curvature should be as above 6666 feet that's 1.2 miles yet it only drops by 3feet over the whole surface this alone proves we are not a spheroid because the definition of sphere in geometry is " a three dimensional shape that looks like a ball ". "A solid that is bounded by a surface consisting of all points at a given distance from a point constituting it's centre". Basically means no straight lines even at a micro scale of a ball. So if we're on a spinning ball how come we got so much flatness of hundreds of miles just a thought for you ball earthers to ponder over .

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2016, 09:22:18 PM »
"The theory of relativity is just a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense.The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent Garb which fascinates,dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying error"
       Nikola Tesla .

You are not on a ball let alone a spinning one.planets are not what you think they are.The stars rotate above us and return to their same positions year after year and have done so for eternity.The horizon is always eye level no matter how high you are and that is only possible on a flat plane.the small sun and moon rotate above us clockwise

*

Offline rabinoz

  • *
  • Posts: 1441
  • Just look South at the Stars
    • View Profile
Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2016, 11:35:52 PM »
ok then globe earthers the circumference of the earth with your measurements e.g. 24,901miles with a radius of 3,959miles the curvature Equation of a ball earth with mainstream science measurements 8 inches per mile multiplied by the distance squared miles.example 8 inches x 50miles ^2       8 inches x 2500=20000 inches /12feet =1666feet meaning there should be 1666feet of curvature along the distance of 50 miles 60 miles=2400feet of curvature
70 miles =3266feet of curvature
80miles = 4256 feet of curvature
90 miles = 5400 feet of curvature
100 miles = 6666 feet of curvature
So taking mainstream science calculations into account the salt flats of Bolivia are 100 miles in length by about 80 miles in width so take into account the measurements of the earth then at 100 miles the curvature should be as above 6666 feet that's 1.2 miles yet it only drops by 3feet over the whole surface this alone proves we are not a spheroid because the definition of sphere in geometry is " a three dimensional shape that looks like a ball ". "A solid that is bounded by a surface consisting of all points at a given distance from a point constituting it's centre". Basically means no straight lines even at a micro scale of a ball. So if we're on a spinning ball how come we got so much flatness of hundreds of miles just a thought for you ball earthers to ponder over .
Where is there sound evidence that "it only drops by 3feet over the whole surface"? And drops compared to what - "mean sea level"?

Sure, being a sphere means "means no straight lines even at a micro scale of a ball", but what is the deviation from a straight line in:
Width
 
Deviation
100 yds
 
0.006"
200 yds
 
0.026"
500 yds
 
0.016"
1000 yds
 
0.65"
1 mile
 
2"
These deviations are from the centre as in:
The earth may be a globe, but on a local scale it's still very flat.


Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2016, 08:09:01 AM »
ok then if we are indeed on a ball how come you cannot detect any curvature? Yes of course we have hills and elavations. And water will always find its level (flatness) it cannot be curved it can't have a hump in it.e.g.from California to Hawaii it is 2,467 miles. Between the two states there should be a "hump" of 770 miles if we're on a globe!! No hump is possible in water use your eyes that's why it's called sea level not sea curve..
"Create a belief in the theory and the facts will create themselves" (Joseph jastow 1935)

Plus there was a study in Kansas where they measured it to be flatter than a pancake.they measured it from west to east and it is approximately 420 miles across so going with the measurements of the earth we can't be a ball because it would be impossible to have a distance of that greatness to be flat! it should have a curvature of at least 22miles across in a distance of 420 miles but it's dead flat.Hundreds of miles of flatness with little change in elevation in several states across America ... And we're on a ball? What kind of ball is that then? Same as ships don't vanish over the horizon they come back into view with any decent telescope or binoculars ,earths atmosphere gives us limited visibility.

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2016, 08:30:00 AM »
Plus where is your sound evidence that were on a ball ? What maybe photos from nasa? Show me one unedited photo of our ball earth without the use of photoshop or cgi.cmon open your eyes.another example is there is supposed to be thousands of satellites in space but how come when you watch live feed of the iss you never ever see any? plus so many independent rockets , balloons have been sent up (without fish eye lense camera) and there is no curvature detected anywhere and the horizon is always eye level if we were on a ball you would have to look down because of the so called curvature but no matter how high you go the horizon remains the same.im not saying we are dead flat all I'm saying is it ain't a ball like we're told it is

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #14 on: July 21, 2016, 09:47:06 AM »


Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2016, 10:13:41 AM »
They use chromakey  screens for the longer videos and zero g planes for the shorter videos
« Last Edit: July 21, 2016, 01:33:55 PM by Heroeswearnohelmets »

*

Offline rabinoz

  • *
  • Posts: 1441
  • Just look South at the Stars
    • View Profile
Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2016, 12:41:21 PM »
ok then if we are indeed on a ball how come you cannot detect any curvature? Yes of course we have hills and elavations. And water will always find its level (flatness) it cannot be curved it can't have a hump in it.e.g.from California to Hawaii it is 2,467 miles. Between the two states there should be a "hump" of 770 miles if we're on a globe!! No hump is possible in water use your eyes that's why it's called sea level not sea curve..
"Create a belief in the theory and the facts will create themselves" (Joseph jastow 1935)
Ever heard of gravity? There is no law that says that the surface of water has to be flat! Water just finds the level that has the lowest energy, which is as far down as possible. On the globe that is as close to the centre as possible.

Quote from: Heroeswearnohelmets
Plus there was a study in Kansas where they measured it to be flatter than a pancake.they measured it from west to east and it is approximately 420 miles across so going with the measurements of the earth we can't be a ball because it would be impossible to have a distance of that greatness to be flat! it should have a curvature of at least 22miles across in a distance of 420 miles but it's dead flat.Hundreds of miles of flatness with little change in elevation in several states across America ... And we're on a ball? What kind of ball is that then? Same as ships don't vanish over the horizon they come back into view with any decent telescope or binoculars ,earths atmosphere gives us limited visibility.

Kansas flatter than a pancake, sure! How flat is a pancake?

Figure 2. Pancake cross-sectional surface being digitized.

Figure 4. Surface topography of Kansas and of a pancake.
But you might just find that the reference for flatness is "mean sea level", take a look at Kansas Is Flatter Than a Pancake.

Quote from: Heroeswearnohelmets
Same as ships don't vanish over the horizon they come back into view with any decent telescope or binoculars ,earths atmosphere gives us limited visibility.
That has never been proved. There are numerous videos of ships disappearing, but I have never seen a convincing one of a ship, or part of a ship, that has disappeared actually being brought back into view.

Have a look at this post (on the other site) Re: Shouldn't we be able to see beaches of other countries if we used telescopes? « Reply #30 on: May 27, 2016, 03:59:01 AM ».

Yes
Quote from: Joseph Jastow, 1935
Create a belief in the theory and the facts will create themselves
is certainly true. The flat earth movement just looked at the local earth and it looked flat, so decided that the whole earth must be flat. Now, they have to create numerous unprovable "facts" to explain the unexplainable!

So, come up with some evidence, then try again!

You are just quoting the usual indoctrination that Flat Earther get, bit without any evidence to back it up!

*

Offline rabinoz

  • *
  • Posts: 1441
  • Just look South at the Stars
    • View Profile
Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2016, 12:47:33 PM »
They use green screens for the longer videos and zero g planes for the shorter videos
That is not a green screen (or blue screen)! A blue screen would hardly have white lines crossing it! That would completely defeat the purpose.
You're just quoting rubbish you've seen without any real evidence.

Really, you had better got back to the "Flat Earther Indoctrination Academy".  ;D Obviously you shouldn't have graduated yet.  ;D

Re: So... any more flat earthers out there with evidence to present?
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2016, 01:05:35 PM »
I never said were flat I just said we don't live on a spinning ball.and as for using gravity as an explanation your just quoting stuff that someone else has said aswell so what makes your evidence so correct ? Albert Einstein was a Freemason there is no such thing as gravity. We're just heavier than air it's all about density and buoyancy. Think about it how could an aeroplane land on a moving runway if the earth was spinning and why if you took a flight from London to New York going with the spin of the earth and from New York back to London going against it (whichever way one way would be against the spin) why does it take the same amount of time ? Surely one way would take longer?..