Pages: < Back  1 2 [3]   Go Down
*

Offline Rounder

  • *
  • Posts: 780
  • What in the Sam Hill are you people talking about?
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Moon Landing
« Reply #40 on: April 06, 2016, 03:51:09 PM »
Quote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on April 06, 2016, 02:49:22 PM
Excuse my language, I thought we were all grown men here
I would not make that assumption.  There are likely some school children who find this site while doing a web search for names and phrases that pop up in discussions here, for example Moon Landing, Cavendish, Tesla, etc.

Plus, some of the arguments (on both sides) are fairly childish, and might be posted by younger participants.
Proud member of İntikam's "Ignore List"
Quote from: İntikam on June 29, 2016, 08:02:28 AM
Ok. You proven you are unworthy to unignored. You proven it was a bad idea to unignore you. and it was for me a disgusting experience...Now you are going to place where you deserved and accustomed.
Quote from: SexWarrior
You accuse {FE} people of malice where incompetence suffice

Offline Round fact

  • *
  • Posts: 188
  • Science and math over opinion
    • View Profile
    • Starflight Publishing
Logged
Re: Moon Landing
« Reply #41 on: April 08, 2016, 11:19:43 AM »
I have noticed on other threads the demand by FE posters for citations and specific evidence for anything challenging the FE myth.

On this thread, it has been stated that there is no need to prove assertions  the Moon landing were faked or that all Space Agencies are liars, which indicates to me at least that this site is more about fantasy and entertainment than anything else
Pages: < Back  1 2 [3]   Go Up