Looks like America wants a criminal for president.
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
Quote from: beardo on August 04, 2016, 03:26:09 PMLooks like America wants a criminal for president.What crime was she charged with?
Quote from: Roundy on August 04, 2016, 05:44:41 PMQuote from: beardo on August 04, 2016, 03:26:09 PMLooks like America wants a criminal for president.What crime was she charged with? You don't need to have been charged with a crime in order to be a criminal.[/quoteOh no! She must have committed a crime. Which one?
Quote from: Roundy on August 04, 2016, 05:44:41 PMQuote from: beardo on August 04, 2016, 03:26:09 PMLooks like America wants a criminal for president.What crime was she charged with? You don't need to have been charged with a crime in order to be a criminal.
If a you steal something without getting caught and charged with the crime, you're still a criminal.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.
Quote from: beardo on August 05, 2016, 02:09:18 AMIf a you steal something without getting caught and charged with the crime, you're still a criminal.Oh cool, what did she steal? Your trust?
Quote from: Rama Set on August 05, 2016, 02:22:43 AMQuote from: beardo on August 05, 2016, 02:09:18 AMIf a you steal something without getting caught and charged with the crime, you're still a criminal.Oh cool, what did she steal? Your trust?I never said she stole anything. I was just trying to demonstrate that it's possible for a person to have commited crimes without having been charged with one.
Did CTR infiltrate FES as well? Hillary's law-breaking is not up to question, as per FBI's own findings and Comey's admission. She's violated, at the very least, the following statutes:18 USC §79318 USC §192418 USC §79818 USC §2071
If we are not speculating then we must assume
Quote from: Blanko on August 05, 2016, 01:43:52 PMDid CTR infiltrate FES as well? Hillary's law-breaking is not up to question, as per FBI's own findings and Comey's admission. She's violated, at the very least, the following statutes:18 USC §79318 USC §192418 USC §79818 USC §2071The same FBI found no criminality to her behavior. If anyone can say she is not a criminal it is them. I don't agree with her behavior, but these are the official findings.
It is not the FBI's job to tell prosecutors whether they should or should not prosecute someone. The fact that they did only suggests that they might be interested in covering her ass. It is not an indication of anything good, by any measure.
Didn't they simply say that they didn't recommend filing charges? Not the same as saying there's no criminality, just that there isn't any point in filing charges.
to call her a criminal is assuming quite a lot and is an opinion rather than any sort of substantial fact.