[Tom Bishop]

It should be fun to watch what develops, here and elsewhere.

You may be in the wrong community then. It is a different Flat Earth community which says the Midnight Sun is impossible. This community has always accepted the Midnight Sun in its models and portrays several mechanisms in its materials, which relay that the Antarctic midnight sun has been in Flat Earth models since at least the 1920's. Even in the classic Monopole model, the magnifying dome demonstration for the seasons appears to make a midnight sun.

It's also plausible that our official celestial model for Flat Earth, the  EA Model, could be extended predict a midnight sun. If the light of the sun actually takes the shape of something similar to the closed loops of magnetic field flux lines, it could be that the earth is interrupting the natural path of the Sun's light and that the rays on a larger scale could loop around and appear to be coming from the opposite direction to a distant observer.

If we take one of the upwardly bending light diagrams in the link above and simply extend the loop of one of the rays which intersect with the earth, it loops around and appears to be coming from an opposite direction.



This isn't new, and I have my own questions about the particulars of how this dipole shape would appear, but the above appears to demonstrate that a midnight Sun is not an impossibility in current constructs.

[Pete Svarrior]

It's good to see that every prediction I've made in May turned out to be exactly correct. Imagine how much real-world good these guys could have done with the money instead.

[mahogany]

It's good to see that every prediction I've made in May turned out to be exactly correct. Imagine how much real-world good these guys could have done with the money instead.

You aren't unique or special in your prediction that this Antarctic trip would not end up really moving the needle in terms of RE theory or FE theory, and that a conspiracy or a scam would be assigned as a reason to invalidate the experience.

I predicted the same in this thread on June 1 and I believe most RE'ers and FE'ers knew the same would happen.

With respect to Tom continuing to bring up the desktop magnifying dome experiment (in his above recent post) to explain how a 24 hour sun could be visible at any location on the flat Earth Antarctic ice wall ring, this continues to be a very sloppy conclusion or use of evidence. As I've said before, our atmosphere isn't made of solid glass and so using a solid piece of magnifying glass to simulate our atmosphere is by no means a valid approach. As I've also said before, it would be like a Round Earther launching a model rocket in their backyard and saying that such a "desktop" experiment can be used to explain how rockets work in a vacuum. I'm intrigued as to why there continues to be such a low bar or standard in the use of this magnifying dome.

[Action80]

It's good to see that every prediction I've made in May turned out to be exactly correct.

You aren't unique or special...I predicted the same in this thread on June 1 and I believe most RE'ers and FE'ers knew the same would happen.

So, you didn't really predict anything.

You just wrote, "I agree with Pete," and thought that agreement (not a prediction) was an EARTh-SHAKING PRONOUNCEMENT, worthy of another post.

[RonJ]

It looks like at least one of the flat earthers has wised up after his trip to Antartica. 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/flat-earth-youtuber-admits-mistake-after-trip-to-antarctica/ar-AA1wdgmr?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=2f464ac6c6fe460fa2b66903f8cf103a&ei=10
Perhaps he can use this publicity to enhance his flat earth channel and stack up even more viewers. 

Now the flat earth community will have to concoct an even more comprehensive bendy light theory to explain what was seen and documented.  Maybe this site will have to bring back the dome.  That should be interesting.  I can see the next 'final experiment' where someone organizes a trip to space. Of course, that has already been done but there wasn't any real flat earth involvement.   Just look up the trip taken by Dude Perfect who now is an official astronaut.  Who should be nominated for such a trip?

[mahogany]

It's good to see that every prediction I've made in May turned out to be exactly correct.

You aren't unique or special...I predicted the same in this thread on June 1 and I believe most RE'ers and FE'ers knew the same would happen.

So, you didn't really predict anything.

You just wrote, "I agree with Pete," and thought that agreement (not a prediction) was an EARTh-SHAKING PRONOUNCEMENT, worthy of another post.

Looks like Action80 didn't read my post from Page 1, dated June 1.
Looks like Action80 is also creating "quotes" and then assigning them to members that never said such "quotes."

But, I guess this could have been predicted of Action80 as well.
   

[Action80]

It's good to see that every prediction I've made in May turned out to be exactly correct.

You aren't unique or special...I predicted the same in this thread on June 1 and I believe most RE'ers and FE'ers knew the same would happen.

So, you didn't really predict anything.

You just wrote, "I agree with Pete," and thought that agreement (not a prediction) was an EARTh-SHAKING PRONOUNCEMENT, worthy of another post.

Looks like Action80 didn't read my post from Page 1, dated June 1.

I would absolutely love to. Why don't you link it and see if the link shows a post made on this thread on June 1, 2024.

Looks like Action80 is also creating "quotes" and then assigning them to members that never said such "quotes."

But, I guess this could have been predicted of Action80 as well.

I quoted direct posts made in this very thread.

I made no alterations to any of the language contained in those posts.

You are just a big liar.

[mahogany]

It's good to see that every prediction I've made in May turned out to be exactly correct.

You aren't unique or special...I predicted the same in this thread on June 1 and I believe most RE'ers and FE'ers knew the same would happen.

So, you didn't really predict anything.

You just wrote, "I agree with Pete," and thought that agreement (not a prediction) was an EARTh-SHAKING PRONOUNCEMENT, worthy of another post.

Looks like Action80 didn't read my post from Page 1, dated June 1.

I would absolutely love to. Why don't you link it and see if the link shows a post made on this thread on June 1, 2024.

Looks like Action80 is also creating "quotes" and then assigning them to members that never said such "quotes."

But, I guess this could have been predicted of Action80 as well.

I quoted direct posts made in this very thread.

I made no alterations to any of the language contained in those posts.

You are just a big liar.

- Go to Reply #14 of this thread. My post date is June 1, 2024.
- You indeed created the quote "I agree with Pete" and then attributed it to me by replying to me: "You just wrote "I agree with Pete"."

[Longtitube]

It should be fun to watch what develops, here and elsewhere.

You may be in the wrong community then. It is a different Flat Earth community which says the Midnight Sun is impossible. This community has always accepted the Midnight Sun in its models and portrays several mechanisms in its materials, which relay that the Antarctic midnight sun has been in Flat Earth models since at least the 1920's. Even in the classic Monopole model, the magnifying dome demonstration for the seasons appears to make a midnight sun.

It's also plausible that our official celestial model for Flat Earth, the  EA Model, could be extended predict a midnight sun. If the light of the sun actually takes the shape of something similar to the closed loops of magnetic field flux lines, it could be that the earth is interrupting the natural path of the Sun's light and that the rays on a larger scale could loop around and appear to be coming from the opposite direction to a distant observer.

If we take one of the upwardly bending light diagrams in the link above and simply extend the loop of one of the rays which intersect with the earth, it loops around and appears to be coming from an opposite direction.



This isn't new, and I have my own questions about the particulars of how this dipole shape would appear, but the above appears to demonstrate that a midnight Sun is not an impossibility in current constructs.

Thank you for the sketch, but it doesn't appear to have uploaded completely – there are no annotations to explain what we're looking at, where an observer would be or where the sun is.

[GMCDXX]

[Pete Svarrior]

You indeed created the quote "I agree with Pete" and then attributed it to me by replying to me: "You just wrote "I agree with Pete"."

It's so funny how obsessed you are with quote fixing. It's part of the old web forum culture, and it's nowhere neat as sinister as you describe it. You had so much time to learn how this place works, but, throughout so many years, across so many alts, you just can't let go of like 3 things.

You aren't unique or special in your prediction that this Antarctic trip would not end up really moving the needle in terms of RE theory or FE theory

And? How does that affect anyone I or anyone else has said here?

[Action80]

When mahogany writes, "I predicted the same thing in this thread on June 1," in response to Pete, he really isn't saying, "I agree with Pete."

Jesus, you can't make this stuff up!

[mahogany]

You indeed created the quote "I agree with Pete" and then attributed it to me by replying to me: "You just wrote "I agree with Pete"."

It's so funny how obsessed you are with quote fixing. It's part of the old web forum culture, and it's nowhere neat as sinister as you describe it. You had so much time to learn how this place works, but, throughout so many years, across so many alts, you just can't let go of like 3 things.

You aren't unique or special in your prediction that this Antarctic trip would not end up really moving the needle in terms of RE theory or FE theory

And? How does that affect anyone I or anyone else has said here?

Old web forum culture... love that one.