No, you lost the privilege of complaining about electing old men with dementia (I'll assume that calling Biden a conman is projection) by electing Trump over Kamala. It would be one thing if it were still Trump vs. Biden, but it wasn't. We had to endure four years of bleating from conservatives about how Biden's age and mental decline were the worst things we could possibly have in a president, and once the shoe was on the other foot and the Republican candidate was the conspicuously ancient one with an obvious and steep mental decline over the past several years, conservatives proved their lack of sincerity by electing him anyway. You can't go back to pretending that relative youth and unhampered mental fitness are the most important qualities in a president now. Trump is less than four years younger than Biden, and there's ample evidence of him being far less sharp and more erratic than he was eight or even four years ago. He says his nonsense more confidently and aggressively than Biden does, but that doesn't make it any less nonsense. You made your choice - partisanship over mental soundness - and now you have to stick to it.
Incidentally, I love the implication that giving the victims $770 each is such a ridiculous idea that it's just being left without comment, as if an explanation of why that's a bad idea or what a better figure would be is unnecessary. I guarantee you not a single one of the chuckleheads jeering along with the RNC in the comments of that post would have a clue what to say if you asked them what the problem was in person.