[Lord Dave]

My point is cons are rackets and the things I listed are certainly "rackets." Therefore, they are cons.

Cons are Rackets but not all Rackets are cons.

[Action80]

War is certainly a con, human trafficking is certainly a con, and the Burisma deal was certainly a con.

You are free to disagree, but any non-biased reader clearly understands I am correct in my analysis.

Any non-biased reader clearly understands Joe Biden to be a demented old pedo, who thankfully, is close to the end of his criminal career and, hopefully, life.

[Lord Dave]

War is certainly a con, human trafficking is certainly a con, and the Burisma deal was certainly a con.

You are free to disagree, but any non-biased reader clearly understands I am correct in my analysis.

Any non-biased reader clearly understands Joe Biden to be a demented old pedo, who thankfully, is close to the end of his criminal career and, hopefully, life.

You are biased.  Thus your writing is biased.
Also, find me a non-biased person. Let's test your theory.

[Action80]

Describe a racket that does not involve some sort of conniving approach.

Then, I will cede the point.