Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Charming Anarchist

Pages: < Back  1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8  Next >
41
Flat Earth Theory / Re: How big is Australia? 99.9% proof one way or the other
« on: April 14, 2016, 02:37:10 AM »
Quick check on google, width of Australia 3.1km, width of Asia 8.8km.
So that is it?  Whatever google says is the truth.

Have you ever driven across Australia?
How long did it take you?  Which way did you go?  How many Kms did you clock?

42
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Question about the Gravity of the FE
« on: April 14, 2016, 02:27:11 AM »
Quote
Universal Acceleration
Shoddy controlled opposition.

Naughty, Naughty and we are told we must learn from the Wiki!
You reveal too much.

43
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Question about the Gravity of the FE
« on: April 11, 2016, 04:58:55 PM »
I I Understood correctly, the assumption is that the gravity is actually an illusion
It is both illusion and fiction.  There is no force of gravity.

and actually Earth is being pushed by a dark matter at the rate of 9.8 meters per second hence generating the illusion of everything being pushed down.
Incorrect.  The earth is not moving nor is it being pusshed up at 9.8 meters per second.

The apple falls down to the ground because it is more dense than air.
The apple floats on water because it is less dense than water but more dense than air.

Less dense matter rises to the top of more dense matter because there is nowhere else to go.

44
Flat Earth Theory / Re: A Simple Experiment for Simple Minds
« on: April 10, 2016, 08:28:11 PM »
My challenge is to argue this, but here's the deal! Before you can argue it, you HAVE to try the experiment above, and share your results.
I am having trouble re-creating the experiment in the dimensions of the earth.  Any ideas how to do that?

Then by all means argue.
You are the 1 arguing with flat earthers.  Tell 10 of your friends "I argue with flat-earthers on the internet." and share your results.

45
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Know who surrounds you
« on: April 10, 2016, 08:20:08 PM »
What?  You think you are entitled to free information?
No -- not for everything.

46
Flat Earth Theory / 8
« on: April 10, 2016, 08:18:19 PM »
Rises up and down from what ?
In and out of what ?
From the north pole, obviously.

There is nothing new here.

47
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Small sun
« on: April 09, 2016, 06:54:48 PM »
Did the explanation change during the years or is this still in effect?
Nobody really knows.  Nobody pretends to have absolute proof either.

I believe the sun is the focal point of energy rays that reflect down from the parabolic curvature of the firmament.  What we see as the transition from dusk to night to dawn to day to dusk again is a huge rainbow that is cycling over and above us.
I also believe that the reflective surface of the firmament varies with the movement of the sun.

By the way, the sun does more than rotate around the pole.  It rises up and down as well as in and out.

48
Flat Earth Theory / Know who surrounds you
« on: April 09, 2016, 06:50:53 PM »
Why should anyone believe the earth is flat?
Know who surrounds you.

49
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Why a sunrise and sunset?
« on: April 08, 2016, 11:01:23 PM »
Light DOES travel
---SNIP---
to the sun that my calculator says 0%
1 cloud blocks the sun's rays.

Can you imagine what 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 clouds might do?

50
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Why a sunrise and sunset?
« on: April 08, 2016, 01:45:24 PM »
So how can there be a sunset or sunrise?
--- because light does not travel forever and you can not see forever.

Even a spotlight turned at a right angle to the viewer is visible to a viewer miles away, and the sun is a -27 magnitude star or for those that use watts, 380 Septillion watts of light. Oh and in lumens it is 6.84X1033 lumens.
Which all boils down to this:  1 cloud in the sky is enough to fully obfuscate the sun's rays.

51
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is that speck of light we spherical Earthlings call satellites?
« on: April 08, 2016, 01:36:11 PM »
I really don't know why I bothered.
You posted a bunch of cookie-cutting sniffing sites.

You did not post a live stream of anything.

52
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is that speck of light we spherical Earthlings call satellites?
« on: April 06, 2016, 02:36:48 PM »

Oh yeah, tons of people uploading their personal photos of these specks of light aren't they.
And you don't have the slightest curiosity as to what these specks of light  might be?
No.
Pics or it did not happen.  GoPro cameras are cheap!

The way to find out the TRUTH is to question these things and find out just what they are.
I would be curious if the satellite-makers put a GoPro camera ---- even with a fish-eye lens --- on their "satellites" and showed us a live-stream of their travels.  That would be cool!
Heck, I am sure these "satellite" companies could make a lot of money selling GoogeAds with their transmission...... oh, wait!  Maybe the GoogleEarthMan might have a problem......

53
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun and Moon shape
« on: February 28, 2016, 09:45:59 PM »
So the sun is a giant magnifying glass??
No.
I believe the reflective surface of the firmament acts as a parabolic mirror of which the sun is the focal point.  The sun's rays are converging down from the firmament.
I thought you followed "Zetetic Cosmology".
Irrelevent.

I supposed you have observed this mirror and if the sun is the focal point please explain how we see the sun not as a "point" but as a disc around 0.5° in diameter.
--- because your eyeball is a sphere.

And, where is the energy source that this "mirror" is focusing?
I am not sure but I am convinced that the frozen horizon goes on and on and on and on.  I think it is credible to believe that there are other pockets with spinning sun's and moons.  The aggregate is likely shining lots of light upwards to the firmament.  That is what we are seeing in the moon ---- a reflection of the earth up upon the firmament.  We are probably a tiny speck in 1 of the moon craters.

Also if "reflective surface of the firmament acts as a parabolic mirror" what makes the sun appear to move?
The magnetic field of the earth probably has something to do with it.

54
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Gravitational Waves
« on: February 28, 2016, 09:33:25 PM »
Is this just totally fraudulent?
Yes.

It is theater for the masses.

I wonder what all of the lab coats will say.

55
Flat Earth Theory / density pressure
« on: February 28, 2016, 09:28:49 PM »
As stated in the FAQ, the force know as gravity doesnt exist, rather what we feel as gravity is the force of the earth accelerating at a rate of 32ft/s/s. If this is the case,
This is NOT the case.

The earth is not moving.  That acceleration theory is disinfo to lead true-earthers into disarray.  Stop thinking that the earth is moving.

The reason why the apple falls down is due to air pressure and density differences.  The apple is more dense than air but less dense than water.

56
Flat Earth Theory / Gravitational Waves of Bullshit
« on: February 24, 2016, 03:09:46 AM »
How has a sun of approximately 17,000 cubic miles lasted so long?  What is the FE dance for this to happen?
Easy:  matter/energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
I learned that in "globular" school.

57
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun and Moon shape
« on: February 07, 2016, 08:30:12 PM »
So the sun is a giant magnifying glass??
No.

I believe the reflective surface of the firmament acts as a parabolic mirror of which the sun is the focal point.  The sun's rays are converging down from the firmament.

58
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun and Moon shape
« on: February 07, 2016, 05:33:30 AM »
Neither.  It is a good question but irrelevent to the true form of the earth.
The sun is not a "source" but rather a focal point of converging rays.
So if you're saying the sun is not the "source" of daylight, what then is?
Nobody knows.

Also, the shape of the sun is totally relevant to the shape of the Earth!
The shape of the sun does not change the shape of the earth.

It is not a mystery.  Just open your eyes, look up in the sky and see for yourself.  The models claim no more than what you can see.
I have, the sun appears round in shape all day so it must either be:
- a disc that is perfectly centered (aimed) on my specific location at all times during the day, even when I travel, or
- a sphere
If the sun is a disc close to Earth it cannot appear as a round shape from all points on a flat earth. Simple observation tells me this is not true.
If the sun is a sphere it will cast daylight on all points of a flat earth all of the time. Simple observation tells me this is not true as it is currently night outside.
Focal point

59
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun and Moon shape
« on: February 05, 2016, 06:39:51 AM »
...but is the sun a point optical source or a spherical optical source?
Neither.  It is a good question but irrelevent to the true form of the earth.
The sun is not a "source" but rather a focal point of converging rays.

Can someone let me know the correct "shape" of the sun and Moon in the FE model?
It is not a mystery.  Just open your eyes, look up in the sky and see for yourself.  The models claim no more than what you can see.

60
Flat Earth Theory / Re: A few genuine questions from a "round earther "
« on: February 04, 2016, 04:04:27 AM »
5) money, black-mail and control

Honest map-making is an odd business because it is impossible for an honest map-maker to survive for the glaringly obvious reason:  NOBODY CAN CLAIM ORIGINAL OWNERSHIP OF A TRUE MAP.  Map-makers struggled to keep their maps under controlled eyes lest their maps be copied.  There were no copyright offices at the time and even if there were, what difference, at that point, would it make?  A copy-cat could just claim that he made the same observations.

How did map-makers get around this challenge?  They deliberately inserted falsehoods in their maps.  The preponderance of false maps only makes sense if you look at human behavior.

THERE IS NO REASON FOR ANYBODY other than God, His Son and or His prophets TO DISCLOSE THE TRUE MAP OF THE EARTH.  There is every reason to keep it hidden.

Monarchs do not want anybody to know how to reach their kingdoms.
Conversely, outlaws do not want any kings to reach their bugouts.

The false globe map satisfies all interests because it makes it virtually impossible for an ignorant invader/army to travel.

What better protection for a king's kingdom than to have all gullible pirates attempt to sail across the pacific ocean or sneak around the south "pole" or any other attempt to make a short-cut based on a false globe map???

It makes perfect sense for multiple competing statesmen to keep the true form of the earth secret.  If I had to write a Hollyweird space movie, it would involve Russian/Chinese actronoughts laughing all the way to the bank.

Chinese pool-boy to Rusky cosmonaut :  "Every year, we call up NASA jokers and tell them to send us more money!  They beg me to make more stupid videos for them to keep their jokes alive.  I do not complain."
Rusky cosmonaut to Chinese pool-boy:  "Ha! Ha!  You work too hard!  We stopped that charade long ago.  Now, we tell them to stick their costumes up their arses and just send us the money.  I put video on Youtube and they scramble to take it down.  I scramble faster and faster and faster until they send me more money."

Pages: < Back  1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8  Next >