Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Charming Anarchist

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 8  Next >
Flat Earth Community / Re: What is the problem with Atheism?
« on: July 20, 2016, 01:44:09 AM »
Tribe Omega: One person jumps on the lion.

Oh, I get it! 
You can read hearts, minds and souls! 

Flat Earth Media / Re: Flat Continents
« on: July 12, 2016, 07:37:34 PM »
Our work will be hard because:
The "Asia" Globe earth map is clearly wrong.
The map is wrong so the pilots often are going to the wrong way.
Perhaps this explains the Spratley Islands dispute. 

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Pre-Rowbotham flat Earth research?
« on: July 06, 2016, 12:58:58 PM »
Before Rowbotham came along and did Bedford Level Experiment, why wasn't there any serious flat Earther doing a serious flat Earth research?
--- because such research is completely useless and a waste of effort for honest hard-working people.  Why are you asking, again?

Next question: 
Before Hollyweirdoes came along and did some Disney movies, why was there not any serious "globalizer" doing a serious "What color is the sky????" research???????????????????

Flat Earth Community / Re: What is the problem with Atheism?
« on: July 06, 2016, 12:27:34 PM »
Good start to a conversation, but maybe this should be in Philosophy, Religion & Society?

Message to sane/honest/intelligent true-earthers:  Notice how the Opening Poster has not participated AT ALL in this silly discussion. 

I am with Tom on this but I like making guesses. 

How can sun and moon levitate in the air above us without falling down, the same way a stone I drop will fall down?
--- the same way a rainbow can levitate in the air above us without falling down. 

What am I missing?
The sun and the moon are not physical objects. 
The sun is a focal point of parabolic rays and the moon is a reflection upon the firmament. 

It mostly does though? ::)
Only on television. 
Not in real life. 

So if it's not because we live on a spherical earth with the moon rotating around it, how can the full moon appear full for anyone?
The moon can not appear full for anybody standing on a giant 3-dimensional merry-go-round either. 
You are welcome!

Flat Earth Community / Re: What is the problem with Atheism?
« on: June 14, 2016, 01:44:20 PM »
You have talked to many flat-Earthers, have you??   and they give a shit about your faith, do they???? 
Okee dokee.  We will just pretend there is no shillery going on here. 

Do I REALLY need a religion to be moral?
Reality check:  You do not need to be moral. 

Here is a challenge for you:  Define the words "religion" and "moral" for yourself.  Try to be as clear as possible so that a person who has never heard those words before will understand you. 

Oh, also...since there are so many that have flown over Antarctica and continue to do so, where are the flat earth explorers who have seen and documented many-month trips along a perimeter ice wall that never ends? All I've seen so far are references to ancient explorers and old books, is there any current exploration evidence? 
Oh, also...since there are so many who have flown over Antarctica and continue to do so, where is any current exploratory evidence?? 

Can the OP provide 1 video of himself flying over Antarctica as he claims? 

Flat Earth Community / Human eye-ball has limits
« on: May 29, 2016, 07:20:13 PM »
I came across a video by Youtube author p-brane which seems to bring up a lot of good points,
It misses the most important point:  the laws of perspective are a consequence of the size and biology of man's retina. 

Human eye-balls have limits. 
The size of the internal spherical surface of the retina is a limit. 
The density of cones and rods on the retina is a limit. 
The abilities of the cones and rods on the retina are limits. 

SHORT VERSION:  The retreating sun appears to meet the horizon because from that distance/angle, the sun's rays can not be discerned accurately enough with MAN's retina. 
SHORTER VERSION:  Man can not see forever. 

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Why can't we ALWAYS see the sun?
« on: May 22, 2016, 02:27:52 PM »
So why does the luminescent shape of the moon change and happen to coincide with the location of the sun in the round earth model?
Stop asking nonsense questions. 
The changes of the moon's shape do NOT coincide with the location of the sun in the round earth model. Unless you are trapped in a cell all day long, you should be able to see that any time you look up. 

You shills talk too much.  Nice to see you admitting the round earth MODEL is just a model. 

What a "charming" answer! But I do have a question.

Shortly after the "enormously bright" sun sets we can often see planets or bright stars in the same place in the sky where the sun was shortly before!

How is this possible if "Light does not travel forever.  Light eventually fades away."?
You answer my question:  How is your shilly question relevent??????????????????

ANSWER:  Light does not travel forever.  Light eventually fades away. 

Next shilly question that has nothing to do with the true form of the earth???

anyway,, so why doesnt anyone do the remote control drone plane over Antartica Due South ?
really.. that would be the icing on the cake !
such a simple idea.
--- because it is impossible.

Try to find a video of a remote contol drone plane flying over the south pole yourself.  You will not find it because nobody has done it..... because it is impossible.... because it does not exist. 

The true form of the earth is irrelevent. 

Flat Earth Community / Re: Genuine question
« on: April 20, 2016, 03:01:26 AM »
Simple fact if it would have been important, Christ would have said "Verily I say to you, If any should say the world is a spinning ball, rebuke them for the truth is not in them" OR " Verily I say go you, when 1988 years pass from now and the flat earth society is erected, my Name will be involved. I say to you now, the truth is not with them". Neither of these exist.
"The sky is blue." and "Water is wet." 

What possibility could have an end game so rewarding to be worth this much trouble, not to mention be pulled off so well?
The premise of your question is entirely wrong. 
It is NOT much trouble at all to keep the gag going. 

Who is having trouble?!?

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Energy density of the sun
« on: April 20, 2016, 02:54:34 AM »
No, the wiki clearly states that
The Wiki is not the gospel.

I do not believe the Wiki is correct on this. 

Dude, this is the age of the internet. If there is widely available public data that the authorities claim to be true, but is easily proven to be false, it generally gets called out.
Thank you for confirming shill standards. 

Message to honest and honorable true-earthers: 
Take note of the double-standards employed by liars to promote their "scientific" lies.   
They ask for ultra-PEER-reviewed references and they offer the lowest common denominator of PEER-review to support their lies. 

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Energy density of the sun
« on: April 18, 2016, 04:21:34 PM »
what causes it to have so much energy density and not burn out?
The sun is not a physical object. 

The sun is the focal point of energy rays that are shining down from the parabolic-reflective surface of the firmament. 

Flat Earth Community / Re: Genuine question
« on: April 18, 2016, 04:16:38 PM »
This is priceless: 
Also accusing me of hypocritically being open minded?? Did you not read what I do for a living? If people even got wind of me taking the slightlist interest into this, I would be blacklisted in bankruptcy. So to even tiny bit risk that would certainly show I look for truth at any corner until that corner has dried up or shows to be promising .
Let me get this straight.....   

You work for folks who would blacklist you into bankruptcy for showing the slightest interest into this.....   that sounds extreme. 
Yet you are asking how a conspiracy can occur.......??   

The world needs people like you to keep it turning!!   

It doesn't matter whether he's driven it himself.  It's enough that people are at liberty to drive across Australia as they please, and nobody has found any evidence that it's a different shape. 
No.  It is NOT enough. 
However, if that is enough-for-shills, then it reveals the Shill Standard of Proof = popular perception.  Thanks for disclosing such! 

If there really was something to hide, they would have to physically keep people out of most of Australia, or else they would just be having faith that nobody will ever pay attention.
Who is they?? 

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 8  Next >