Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TomInAustin

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 36  Next >
1
Use of lighter than air craft and balloons . Nasa uses these , and probably others too

https://ravenaerostar.com/products/balloons-airships

But you can see GPS satellites with your own eyes and no balloon can cross the night sky that fast.  Right?

2
Flat Earth Community / Re: why can’t the people in south see Polaris
« on: February 14, 2020, 07:23:59 PM »

I believe it is approximately 5,000 miles away from my location during the summer months, at around 10:00 am.


If that is true how can you see it?  if this is true?

The ability of humans to perceive objects is roughly limited to 350 km, regardless of the shape of the earth.

Are you arguing with yourself?

3
Flat Earth Community / Re: More fake moon landing proof.
« on: February 11, 2020, 07:28:00 PM »
Which scientist carried out a repeatable controlled scientific experiment that proves that rocket engines work in a vacuum ?

James Joule provided the scientific experiment which proved otherwise - a law of physics no less.

The fact that there are over 21,000 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbit proves all we need to know.  The fact many are visible with the naked eye is just icing on the cake.

Question...  When Space X puts thousands more visible objects into orbit what will your reaction be when you can't look at the night sky and not see them?


4
Flat Earth Theory / Re: I'm a RE'r and have some questions!
« on: February 11, 2020, 07:08:06 PM »
@iamcpc, NASA's budget is actually accounted for publicly and even if it weren't, there's not much money going into NASA and space travel from the government compared to other things. I don't think the US government need NASA to line their pockets. God knows the government already tax the hell out of us anyway.

NASA was not lining pockets of their own but those of all the big defense contractors.  The big reason why Space X and other private outfits can go to space is they are not doing it on a cost-plus basis.  I understand the follow the money aspect of this, Apollo and the shuttle were hugely profitable from cost-plus contracts.  They had every incentive to run the costs up.   The new way to do it is that Space X and others are keeping the intellectual property and will be able to turn big profits the old fashioned way, providing a service.

It's going to be very hard to deny spaceflight after Space X puts up all the Starlink spacecraft as you will not be able to look at the night sky and not see them.

5
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Are plane tickets real?
« on: February 11, 2020, 04:47:41 PM »


This has been addressed numerous times.

And debunked as many times.

Quote

These airlines offer such flights for purchase.

The thing is, if you buy such a ticket, it is:

A) a NON-REFUNDABLE PURCHASE; and,
B) You end up typically moved to a different flight with a stop over (one that conveniently matches the Azimuthal Equidistant Map).


Proof?



Quote
For those rare non-stop flights that do occur, it would not be surprising to find that aerial refueling is taking place, something of which the passengers would be totally unaware.


OMG, aerial refueling in an airliner, this is a new low. 

6
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Terminal Velocity?
« on: February 03, 2020, 03:38:36 PM »
Do you have measurements of air density as it varies for a skydiver.  I suggest it does not significantly vary.

If I recall correctly its about 1 atmosphere of pressure change between Sea Level and 8000 feet.

7
Flat Earth Media / Re: Trending on youtube front page
« on: January 22, 2020, 08:34:03 PM »


A highly polished hit piece. The irony being, that it will only fuel flat earth theory.  :D

This is one of the channels I watch, they do some interesting stories.  Thanks

8
Flat Earth Community / Re: Sorry were not going to Mars now....Really?
« on: January 22, 2020, 04:40:06 PM »
I had my hopes up to see the NASA fake videos and astronuts lying about their round trip BS. But alas, Mars mysteriously lost all water so I guess we'll just have to go to Pluto now ! Stay tuned for more billions flushed on Satanic lies.

"Vanishing water MYSTERY casts doubt over Mars colonization plans"

https://www.rt.com/news/477927-water-vanishing-from-mars-mystery/



I get the lies but I don't get the ties to space exploration to Satan. The path to heaven is through the blood of Christ. Not through the belief that we didn't go to outer space. The bible does not say ANYTHING about not believing in outer space exploration or travel.

Please this just shows your ignorance of Gods love. 

Psalm 115:16 King James Version (KJV)

16 The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.

Job 1:7 ESV /
The Lord said to Satan, “From where have you come?” Satan answered the Lord and said, “From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.”

Luke 10:18 ESV /
And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.


Job 38:4   

"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding,


Psalm 104:5   

He established the earth upon its foundations, So that it will not totter forever and ever.

Blessing awaits you !!!

Anytime you quote a book of myths you automatically lose an argument.

Thanks for playing

It's clear you are of Satan. 55% of the Earths population is either Christian or Islam which believes their words of God...Flat Earth  Sure many of these are blinded, no matter the words are written many many centuries.

No, thank you for NOT PLAYING, you don't deserve a seat at my table !!!

https://www.answering-islam.org/authors/shamoun/flat_earth_revisited.html

"In this article we are going to provide irrefutable evidence that the Quran teaches that the earth is flat."

So you are adding a second book of myths to the first one?  What's next Harry Potter quotes?

And it cracks me up to hear that I don't deserve a seat at your table.   Like all the other hypocrites that sprew bible nonsense, you wear it like a badge and lord it over other people.  Not very christ-like.  If Christ was real and came back you would be the last one he would pick.  Evil in the name of religion, good one.

9
Flat Earth Community / Re: Sorry were not going to Mars now....Really?
« on: January 21, 2020, 06:08:03 PM »
Quote
"In this article we are going to provide irrefutable evidence that the Quran teaches that the earth is flat."

That's great, so I'll just write a book about how my god made the globe and everyone on it then I'll quote that as irrefutable evidence that the Mattible teaches that the earth is a globe. I didn't realise it was this easy to prove something!

I think you would need to jump thru many more hoops but please see if you can do your evidentiary tale. You see the Bible was written by many individuals and has stood the test of 2000 years. Jesus is mentioned in non religious writings also, so the proof is positive he walked the Earth and was crucified. Gods word in the Bible cannot be changed and will always exist, that's his law, you can't change that.

The History channel explains some non religious writers describing Christ.

https://www.history.com/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence

"Historian Flavius Josephus wrote one of the earliest non-biblical accounts of Jesus."

"Tacitus connects Jesus to his execution by Pontius Pilate."

If the Bible claims Flat Earth and stationary, you can take that to the bank. All this hocus pocus science BS is just misdirection by the great deceiver and his minions. Satan was cast down here, he ain't leaving nor can he escape, same as you and I. Judgement day you might get a ticket to ride, till then, don't bump your head on the dome, it's like molten glass.

It's a pretty big leap to go from someone lived to he was the son of god!   

10
Flat Earth Community / Re: Podcast Interview
« on: January 16, 2020, 04:41:29 PM »
Hello Flat Earth Society,

My name is Ben Van Hook and I was wondering if any member reside in or near Tempe Arizona and would like to represent the Flat Earth community in a 30 minute interview on a podcast me and a friend of mine have started called A Side of Gravy. We are both respectable level headed reasonable people and would just like to talk politely and freely about the Flat Earth Theory. Let me know if you have any questions or would like more information, I would be happy to provide anything you need. Thank you.

Many podcasts interview people via Skype so why limit it to local?

11
Flat Earth Community / Re: Sorry were not going to Mars now....Really?
« on: January 16, 2020, 04:39:28 PM »
I had my hopes up to see the NASA fake videos and astronuts lying about their round trip BS. But alas, Mars mysteriously lost all water so I guess we'll just have to go to Pluto now ! Stay tuned for more billions flushed on Satanic lies.

"Vanishing water MYSTERY casts doubt over Mars colonization plans"

https://www.rt.com/news/477927-water-vanishing-from-mars-mystery/



I get the lies but I don't get the ties to space exploration to Satan. The path to heaven is through the blood of Christ. Not through the belief that we didn't go to outer space. The bible does not say ANYTHING about not believing in outer space exploration or travel.

Please this just shows your ignorance of Gods love. 

Psalm 115:16 King James Version (KJV)

16 The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.

Job 1:7 ESV /
The Lord said to Satan, “From where have you come?” Satan answered the Lord and said, “From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.”

Luke 10:18 ESV /
And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.


Job 38:4   

"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding,


Psalm 104:5   

He established the earth upon its foundations, So that it will not totter forever and ever.

Blessing awaits you !!!

Anytime you quote a book of myths you automatically lose an argument.

Thanks for playing


12
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Terminal Velocity?
« on: January 07, 2020, 04:04:09 PM »
Quote
Terminal Velocity

In the Round Earth model, terminal velocity happens when the acceleration due to gravity is equal to the acceleration due to drag. In the Flat Earth model, however, there are no balanced forces: terminal velocity happens when the upward acceleration of the person is equal to the upward acceleration of the Earth.

Q: If gravity does not exist, how does terminal velocity work?

A: When the acceleration of the person is equal to the acceleration of the Earth, the person has reached terminal velocity.

Why is terminal velocity even a thing in the UA model of FE?  It is a concept applicable to free falling bodies, which according to UA don’t exist.  Things don’t fall…the earth rises up to meet them.

But it is a demonstrable fact that if a person jumps out of a plane the distance between the person and ground decreases at an increasing rate until at some point (depending or air density, humidity, weight…etc.), the distance begins decreasing at a constant rate.

What causes that if the earth is rising at a constant rate and there is no air resistance (because the person is not actually “falling” but is suspended motionless) to affect the rate at which the distance between the earth and person decreases? Not to mention the fact that when a skydiver opens a chute, the rate decreases…what would cause the decrease?  Again, it can’t be drag…because there is no drag on something that is not falling.

Also in the wiki...
Quote
One of the primary proofs for the Universal Accelerator is the fact that bodies fall without inertial resistance.

But in a non-vacuum environment  bodies do fall with air resistance which wouldn’t be the case unless the body is actually moving through the air and not just suspended motionless until the ground reaches it.

If you release a feather and a bowling ball at the same height and both are suspended motionless until the earth meets it…why does the earth reach the bowling ball first?

Not being a flat earther and having over 900 skydives I think I can take a stab at this.   

If UA was a thing (and it's not) the air could not be affected by it other than the earth pushing up on it.    (If UA pushed the air the same as it pushed the ground there would be consistent air pressure at all altitudes.)  This would create more air pressure the lower you got due to compression.  This would create the drag you are looking for.  Relative to the universe outside of the UA influence you would appear to rise, not float in one spot.

A good a guess as any?


13
Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Flight tracker app
« on: December 30, 2019, 04:51:54 PM »
What you are seeing are aircraft coming into and leaving ground-based radar and tracking.  These do not apply when you are out in the middle of the pacific ocean.

But you can see flights 'live' midflight between South Africa and Australia above the Ocean. But that's beside the point.
Maybe I should hire someone from Peru and purchase the ticket for him and make him live stream the whole trip and pay on completion.

Yes, you can see them but if you mouse over you will see "estimated" on the metadata..




You are dealing with curvature and huge distances.



14
Flat Earth Media / Re: ISS Lens correction
« on: December 27, 2019, 09:26:42 PM »
There's no doubt NASA is BS, but it appears yours is also. Case in point, you rarely see stars, yet we look up and see them in the firmament galore. Second it appears NASA is using an above the horizon separate theatrical show without many, if any, stars. Occasionally they do appear, like in the 4th video at 4:10 and they rotate down into the flat earth view, which is impossible and proves above the horizon BS. Third your first video at 15:10 is conveniently cut away just as a star is about to enter the flat earth viewing area.

I call major BS on it all and trust only Gods word....This sucker is flat and ain't moving !!!

There's no doubt god is BS but it appears yours is also.


I call major BS

15
Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Flight tracker app
« on: December 27, 2019, 03:57:44 PM »
Hi,
I've been watching a flight tracker app, and there are flights on it from South America to Australia in what they claim is 13 flighthours.
If you take London to Perth 2/3 of the distance on the FE map, it takes them 15:45 hours.
Johannesburg to Sydney 11 hours.
Buenas (sorry) Aires to Johannesburg in 8 hours.

The thing about the Sydney-Santiago flights, the timezones go from -8 to +10 and if you look at the flight route watchback function, it either starts just 1 hour away from Sydney (coming from Santiago) or it start from Sydney, stalls from a few seconds and teleports to 1 hour away from Santiago.
I looked at other flights and some routes do stall and then skip a little distance sometimes, but not nearly the distance of crossing the Pacific Ocean.
It flies over New Zealand and jumps to the coast of Chili every time.
I've seen live flights midway above the Pacific Ocean so what gives.

What do you think?

What you are seeing are aircraft coming into and leaving ground-based radar and tracking.  These do not apply when you are out in the middle of the pacific ocean.   

16
A man, sitting on a rolling office chair, pushing against the medicine ball while at the same time tossing it (it is actually the force of pushing against the medicine ball, giving rise to the reactionary force of rolling away from that point) is now an explosion.


How can someone be so dense?  Did you ever attend a science class?   On one hand, you say that rockets are fake but think the evil shadow government has holograms that can fake a launch.

LOL

18
Unless it's NASA or someone promoting the NASA satanic agenda, I've been walking this earth for long enough to know there has never been any proof of a ball earth. Never, as humans we just don't see or feel the spin of this imaginary ball. In contrast things like water finding its level and soft tissue in dinosaur bones are just a few facts that prove without a doubt we are created on a plane with a dome.

Right on time, J Man the bibletard shows up

19
Why would I want to go watch holographic images?
And that, right there, sums up a lot of mentality I see from conspiracy theorists.
You believe something without providing any evidence but when you are shown evidence for being incorrect you just without basis dismiss it as fake.
It's a pretty dishonest way of debating.
But OK, as you said it - what is your evidence that rocket launches are holographic images which are good enough to fool people from multiple viewpoints and angles. Does that technology even exist?

Exactly.  Pick a stance and defend it to the death no matter how retarded it makes you look.  Holograms and ignoring 5th grade level science.   LOL

20

Why would I want to go watch holographic images?


LOL, this is the post of the decade and just in time.  Holographic images LOL

Delude yourself much?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 36  Next >