Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rekt

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6  Next >
1
Flat Earth General / Re: The Window of the Dome
« on: September 01, 2017, 12:02:18 PM »
Of course the Dome above the Flat Earth is real. God opened the windows of the dome for forty days and nights causing the world to be flooded. Only Noah and his family survived, which we are all decedents of.

This has been proven in numerous archaeological finds. You are not an ape, you may smell like one but don't let that fool you.

What sayeth you?
Where do meteorites come from if this "Dome" exists?

2
Flat Earth General / Re: 50 Years Later
« on: September 01, 2017, 12:01:46 PM »
50 years and just to risky. Um huh

I don't buy it at all. We have money coming out our kester, fools willing to one way ticket to Mars so safety is NOT an issue. These excuses which is what they are, just trying to cover the fact we never went to the moon and never will.

Musk is a shill for the .gov, $5 billion in tax payer dollars.
There are no one-way tickets with NASA. WHEN, not IF, we go to Mars the astronauts will go and return to Earth safely. The government has money, but we spend 600 BILLION dollars on our proud military. Not much left for NASA after we spend the rest on welfare.

3
Flat Earth General / Re: 50 Years Later
« on: August 31, 2017, 12:44:29 PM »
That's right folks, it's been 50 long years, some peoples lifetime since we supposedly walked on the moon 238,000 miles away (he he) excuse me while I giggle.

Why has no one returned? Why haven't we returned? It's not like we don't have $20 TRILLION laying around to spend in a couple short years. We do.

No folks, it's because a lifetime later it's pretty clean it was all a lie, just like the fact the earth is flat as Kansas with the Sun and Moon the same size in a dome above us. In fact the moon isn't even round, it's a flat circle projecting it's own cool soothing light.

People really need to stop trying to justify a "never did happen" 50 years later, they look down right stupid with their rhetoric.
NASA has been hamstrung by poor funding and a lack of priority. If we had the money, we could go back there easily. But the Vietnam War, and expenses of it, sucked NASA dry. They had Apollos 18, 19, and 20 planned, but they were scrapped and the Saturn V boosters (Which had already been built) either sent to museums or used for Skylab. The Apollo program cost 110 BILLION dollars, and if you factor in the cost of separate research and previous programs the cost was  (excuse my pun) astronomical. The US government didn't have the motive to spend any money on space after we trounced those dang commies.

4
Flat Earth General / Re: The Moon
« on: August 18, 2017, 12:02:56 AM »
The distance to the moon is solidly known. If you have a steady enough aim (Not your hand, some kind of system), a laser, a receiver, and good timing software for it, you can calculate using the speed of light as a known constant and the return time to get the distance. We have done this using the Lunar Rangefinding Receivers, left by the Apollo astronauts.

5
Flat Earth General / Re: A misunderstanding
« on: August 18, 2017, 12:00:23 AM »
is to trick us in believing, so we can give out chi-energy/life energy we generate for latter exploitation.
Do you have ANY evidence of this "chi" existing? Why would believing in the moon cause us to give out this life energy? Why is it exploited, and how? If these so called "Higher ups" can build a fake moon why would they need the "energy" that our belief in it gives off?

6
Flat Earth General / Re: A misunderstanding
« on: August 17, 2017, 11:58:18 PM »
Smokified, for now i think, that the moon is local for a region, i.e. there are multiples of moons. I suppose, the light is projected simultaneously from the moon's face/disk module(there could be modules of the whole system) and from around it's metallic sphere/spheroid core. The craters and shadows on the moon are just a, possibly holographic, textures, like in video games or decorations at theater. So if hypothesis i'm retranslating is correct, then any calculations based on moon craters are pointless. The purpose of textures is to trick us in believing, so we can give out chi-energy/life energy we generate for latter exploitation.
Quote
, and it is certainly not artificial.
Are you sure?
Quote
Humanity doesn't have the capability to build celestial bodies
We don't, rulers of the world do. What if it's not humanity, who built moon you're seeing almost everyday?
Quote
1/8th the size of earth
There are moonrises and moonsets too!
why do think the moon is as large as our planet? Just observe attentively the moon everyday, whenever you can, from different locations for two months and see if it doesn't looks like it's orbiting/flying close to ground.
We know for a fact how far away the moon is, due to the LRRs, or Lunar Rangefinding Reflectors, left there during the Apollo missions. Anyone from around the world can bounce a laser off one of those and knowing the speed of light calculate how far away the moon is. It isn't close to the ground.

7
Flat Earth General / Re: A misunderstanding
« on: August 14, 2017, 04:23:11 PM »
Rekt, are you sure that the moon is not an artificial object(s) flying around the earth, like lantern or a hologram, projected around by? Maybe all of these facts about the moon, like the dust and radiation, are "shifted" from something else, i.e. the facts about moon belong to something else, for example, outside of our planet system!
The gain of shifting the facts of one thing to another is to lie efficiently - to lie and to tell the truth. It's like giving a little truth before forcing to swallow a lot of lies. The bad example would be: sugaring poop just to make it more pleasant for swallowing.
The moon is orbiting around the earth, not flying, and it is certainly not artificial. Humanity doesn't have the capability to build celestial bodies 1/8th the size of earth as far as I can tell

8
Kudo's to anyone who even understood what Hmmm was attempting to communicate.  I'm not on that list.
I quite agree. His tone was like: "I know I'm wrong but here's some probably fake evidence"?

9
Flat Earth General / A misunderstanding
« on: August 09, 2017, 12:09:40 AM »
It is commonly thought that space is an extremely hostile environment, and that one of the big things proving that NASA has faked it all is this hostility. Such an idea is an uninformed one.
Take, for example, the surface of the moon. It looks barren and dangerous enough, but it's not actually that bad!
On Earth we experience a background radiation dose of 2.4mSv each year.
On the moon, annual background radiation is roughly  380mSv. This may seem like a lot, but take into account the duration of the stay. With 356 days/year, and a stay of ~1 day for the Apollo 11 astronauts (22 hours exactly). 380/365= ~1.041. So on the lunar stay the Apollo astronauts were hit with 1.041mSv of radiation during the stay. But that was how much they were HIT by. For the entire stay they were either wearing a suit (Layers of Kevlar, cloth, and polymers), and while not on EVA wearing both the suit and being surrounded by the metal of the Lunar Module (Minus suit helmet). With these numbers, you could realistically expect their radiation dosage to be lower than 1.041mSV. The radiation levels allowed for civil nuclear workers is 1mSv per year over the background dose. So radiation on the moon poses no major threat to these astronauts. Even considering the Van Allen Belts, the radiation is negligible. The limit for nuclear workers is for civil servants, who undergo that extra radiation year after year. The Apollo astronauts were only going to do this once. The human body can experience quite a bit of radiation without danger, as long as it is a) spread out or b) never repeated.

The gravity of the moon actually LESSENS the danger of the moon's surface. If you fall, the damage will be light, and your muscles undergo less strain while working in low gravity

The vacuum of the moon is a non-issue as long as correct protocols are followed and there is no suit or lander breach. If you want to deny the existence of pressure suits, then there is no hope for you.

The surface dust of the moon IS actually dangerous. It is in reality formed of silicon dioxide glass. The suits of the Apollo program were specifically designed with this in mind, however. It had Kevlar in its design, and extremely thick and strong boot soles. The astronauts tried to avoid kneeling as it would possibly wear down the knees. This glass abrasion is an issue, but quite solvable. The dust was quite happy to stick on suits and equipment, and the astronauts said that it got everywhere. However it did not cause any problems for the astronauts.

In conclusion, no environmental issues are in existence that could compromise the NASA story of the Apollo missions.


 

10
The wiki does not clearly explain what exactly the evidence against NASA is. Even the more lengthy explanations are not of the highest quality. For example, the page "A Close Look at the Lunar Lander", is a joke of an explanation. It even quotes Tom Bishop and someone called "Mizzle" as if they are experts

  "Anyone who thinks that this landed and launched from the surface of the moon and that
    grown men lived in it with their space car is sadly deluded."
   
    - Tom Bishop

So can anyone give me a good argument proving the faults in NASA's official story?

11
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA is not fake.
« on: May 10, 2017, 04:33:48 PM »
A simple argument can dispel all conspiracies about NASA: Why didn't the Soviets disprove it? And why wouldn't America disprove soviet successes such as Sputnik to give themselves a more prominent position? A rebuttal of an entire space program that is a main source of national pride would be a HUGE propaganda coup, and why wouldn't the Americans disprove the Soviet's missions or the Soviets disprove NASA's missions? You could say that they wanted to preserve themselves, but what about North Korea? They have no space program, the technology to show that there is nothing in space, and the hatred of America as a motive!
(Before Tom Bishop says something about the "Domination of space" and "ICBMs in orbit", let me tell him that ICBMs are stored in silos firmly rooted in the ground. If they have launched and are in orbit, that means that someone has started a nuclear war. There are no nukes in orbit.)

So if the earth is actually flat there is a very plausible reason why every government would lie and go with the idea that America and the rest of the world could and have made it to outer space. The obvious answer is that for 500 years we have been told that the earth is round, 93 millions miles away from the sun, spinning 1,000 mph as we circle the sun all while hurling through space at 56,000 mph. Then we sink billions of dollars into a space program to show us this ball. What happens if we find the earth to be flat and that we can't get out of our atmosphere? All of science becomes a joke! Every "intellectual" that droned on and on about how people who think the earth is flat are stuck in the dark ages now becomes an imbecile. Everything we've been told and believed would be proven a lie. If they fooled us about this, what else are they attempting to fool us about? What is to be believed?

That's a lot of egg on the face of science.
Except for that whenever science is wrong it adjusts its model to fit new observations. The Nazis would have been the first to realize the earth was flat, with the first ever spaceflight being a V2.

12
Flat Earth General / Re: Boy, NASA sure has a lot of pics
« on: May 06, 2017, 07:43:18 PM »
I still don't get why people think that we have been behind ANYONE in technology at any point. I mean we have a space program in advance of everyone, aircraft a generation ahead of what everyone else has, companies such as Intel, Apple, Microsoft, and Google, and yet "We're not on the cutting edge"

13
Flat Earth Debate / Re: How thick is the Earth according to FE
« on: April 24, 2017, 10:19:50 PM »
The thickness of the flat earth is something I have never seen an answer for. However, the very way we measure the thickness of the earth's layers is  a proof of the round earth. Seismic waves bounce through the earth, telling us a lot about what makes it up.

14
Flat Earth General / Re: New Earth Timelapses
« on: April 21, 2017, 12:52:59 AM »
I like in the intro how the radiator slides by the edge of the frame. It just makes me think of how much it took, and how amazing the ISS is.

15
Flat Earth General / Re: Sun is a Spotlight
« on: April 20, 2017, 11:23:01 PM »
With this theory we can explain everything... the season, 24h day at the southpol, just everthing. Don't question those things/thoughts. They are axioms! There are big iron plates which float above earth. Stars startet existing, because this plates got holes. flat earth is real! don't question this!
What causes this phenomenon, how did that get there in the first place, what causes the holes, what is the light behind the plates?
You know, the earth is constantly accelerating upwarts. This is the reason why much iron gathered around one piece of a magnet. And the air is pushing this ironplate upwarts. What do you say against this? ;)
Magnetism isn't caused by acceleration. I think you mean "Upwards" even though you have no proof of that acceleration.

16
Flat Earth General / Re: Sun is a Spotlight
« on: April 20, 2017, 02:18:26 PM »
With this theory we can explain everything... the season, 24h day at the southpol, just everthing. Don't question those things/thoughts. They are axioms! There are big iron plates which float above earth. Stars startet existing, because this plates got holes. flat earth is real! don't question this!
What causes this phenomenon, how did that get there in the first place, what causes the holes, what is the light behind the plates?

17
Flat Earth General / Re: Boy, NASA sure has a lot of pics
« on: April 18, 2017, 03:06:41 PM »
And Russian national interest would DEFINITELY benefit from the moon landing fake being uncovered. IMAGINE the propaganda coup that would be! America isn't on the forefront of research and technology, they're just a bunch of liars!
Ah, yes, the worldwide propaganda coup that would completely topple America, Russia, China, and probably half of the EU. Yes, I'm sure a Russian coup is exactly what Russia wants.

Is your username self-referential by any chance?

Also, America is no longer on the forefront of science and technology. Sorry to remind you. Turns out the coup was unnecessary.
Since when are we not on the forefront?

18
Flat Earth General / Re: Boy, NASA sure has a lot of pics
« on: April 17, 2017, 02:21:11 PM »
5 - Ah, yes, Wikileaks, the group whose idea of the "truth" just happens to perfectly align with Russian national interests. But, more seriously: No, I do not see why it would have to happen by now. There is no doubt in my mind that the issue will eventually be uncovered, but you've presented no reasoning to suggest a schedule or timeframe.
And Russian national interest would DEFINITELY benefit from the moon landing fake being uncovered. IMAGINE the propaganda coup that would be! America isn't on the forefront of research and technology, they're just a bunch of liars!

19
Flat Earth General / Re: Boy, NASA sure has a lot of pics
« on: April 17, 2017, 01:14:20 PM »
Star Wars laser type weapon zapping something on earth
The Star Wars program was designed to zap missiles as they flew towards the US, not to zap something on the ground.

20
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA is not fake.
« on: April 12, 2017, 04:59:53 PM »
I'm referring to Tom's continuing statements that this is about "Military superiority with nukes in orbit". The nukes aren't in orbit, ever, only trajectories, and that's only when they are launched. And nuclear showdowns are not about "domination", they are world-ending events.

How the #### do you know? Do you know exactly what each and every "satellite" is equipped with when it is launched? Either "Star Wars" exists or space travel isn't possible or feasible. There is ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE IN HELL that we haven't Weaponized space if it is even remotely possible.
What exactly is the strategic advantage?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6  Next >