Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - person1234

Pages: [1]
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moon landing Technology-Adam ruins everything
« on: October 13, 2020, 09:31:19 AM »

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moon landing Technology-Adam ruins everything
« on: October 10, 2020, 01:05:23 AM »
I understand about why the first half might be wrong, but does anyone has an explanation about how the reflectors were put on the moon if people haven't gone too the moon and other practicalities about how to convince that 400 000 people and governments.

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moon landing Technology-Adam ruins everything
« on: October 10, 2020, 12:49:29 AM »
Thanks, that explains the first half but what about the second half about how they convinced multiple world governments and superpowers help them and also I forgot to mention they layed retroreflectors on the moon which can be seen with some very expensive telescopes. How is that explained.

Flat Earth Theory / Moon landing Technology-Adam ruins everything
« on: October 10, 2020, 12:15:32 AM »
So I'm new to the flat earth video and recently watched a video from TruTv which is about the technology required to fake the moon landing.

The main topic is that the parallel sun rays in the moon landing. If normal studio lighting was used the shadows would diverge and there would be no parallel sun rays. The only way this could be faked in a studio is if they had access to a wall of millions of laser lights. The estimated cost of this would be more than the entire Apollo project. This was a massive problem though because laser lights cost a large amount during this time. Normal laser lights would also not work because they were too large. The other problem with laser lights is that they only put out red light probably because they didn't have the technology for other colors so using laser lights would've been impossible. This could've been developed with computer graphics but the computer graphics required were only created 40 years later.

The next point is that if Nasa were able to create computer graphics that were 40 years ahead of their time. They would then have to make over 400 000 nasa employees at that time keep both the secret that nasa faked the landing and everyone who could've created this computer graphic software. They would then have to convince Spain, England, Australia to work with them and lie that they independently picked up on the transmission from space. Most importantly they would have to convince Russia who had been their rival throughout the entire coldwar and had also probably dedicated billions in trying to beat America in the space race or billions faking that they were participating in the space race. This task would've probably been nye impossible because it was still the cold war. Since the moon landing Russia has never claimed the space landing was faked.

I was wondering if there was an explanation to why this debunking is false.

Pages: [1]