1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: A new Flat Earth cosmological model (Celestial Ocean Theory)

« on: December 28, 2017, 10:15:46 PM »

FLAT_IS_TRUTH, How do you know,
 if what you see up there in the sky are not hovering or projected "plasmaholograms" ??

(...)
my reply to "What are stars?" topic
my reply to "THE SUN " topic
"Is THIS the sun/moon/stars/planets?" topic
(...)

I do not. That is the nature of deistic solipsism. One of the key tenets of Flat Earth Theory (FET, or alternative hypothesis the likes of Celestian Ocean Theory, COT) is to abolish truth as a concept and tool of graspable knowledge and instead reconstruct a new non-material theory which uses deductive reasoning to construct a reality which is as close to the hallucination produced by our brains which we refer to as the construct of reality. There is no such thing as set truth, there is only our electrochemical signals which create a virtual reality within our consciousness which is a rough approximation of the material world. As a result, the human mind becomes susceptible to lies and deceit and manipulation, something which NASA and other pro-globe organizations and states benefit from.

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Why is earth special?

« on: December 28, 2017, 10:08:21 PM »

1: Gravity does not exist; it is a product of a biased scientific community. Everything in observable physics can be explained through the laws of buoyancy, no gravity needed. The Universe, encased in the Celestial Ocean, accelerates upwards.

False. An attractive force between two masses is easily shown to exist. The simplest is the The Cavendish Experiment, of which literally hundreds of demonstrations can be found online, if you don't feel like taking the time to do it yourself.

There are other more complex demonstrations available that address the criticisms of The Cavendish Experiment, but generally require prohibitively expensive equipment to perform, my suggestion is based on cost effectiveness to give you something you can do in your living room to demonstrate that gravitational attraction between masses does exist.

2: The planets do exist. Or, well, they do not exist in the same way NASA tells you. In my Celestial Ocean Theory, which I find the most reliable, the planets - as well as meteorites - are simply debris generated by cracks in the Firmament. This debris floats above the Sun and the Moon as the laws of buoyancy dictate.

Which implies that the Sun, the Moon are less dense than air (it can't be a vacuum up there as buoyancy requires a fluid medium) while meteoroids are even less dense, right up until that point where they become more dense and fallen to Earth as a meteorite.

Also, how does cracks in the firmament, which you claim that Libyan Desert Glass are pieces of, 'generate' a solid iron object (which is less dense than air up to the point where it isn't anymore)?

3: The exact nature of the ice walls are unknown, but according to COT, they are not actually holding the oceans in; they are simply supporting the Firmament. We will probably never get to know the exact nature of the Ice Walls because Antarctica is heavily guarded and it is almost impossible for civilians to be allowed to reach the South Pole (Because it doesn't exist).

The South Pole is a tourist destination:

https://www.polarcruises.com/antarctica/destinations/south-pole-land-based

Not touching #4, because saying something like "because, you know, the success of total population control is totally dependent on the shape of the surface" would probably get me banned.

1: The Cavendish experiment is popular among globeheads, but has not yet been reproduced. There are a thousand ways to disprove it, here is just one:

Every one can witness, that no matter how large and massive of two balls, of steel you make and place them close together, that there never, ever was a perceptible attraction by Newtonian gravity of one for the other. But everyone can build the tiniest of bar magnets and notice that as you bring the two closer together, that the snap at one another in attraction.

 Also, the asteroid Ida and its moon Dactyl. Anyone doing the Cavendish Experiment and believing it, should look at the asteroid belt, that all the asteroids should have moons based on Cavendish Experiment, but the fact is, that gravitational bonding is a rare phenomenon, because, well, gravity is not Newtonian and that gravity is EM-gravity.

 2: Libyan Desert Glass is not made of iron. It is an entirely different material. It is denser than air, which is why it falls. The Firmament, which is made of Desert Glass, is supported by the Antarctic Ice Walls, which is why the dome does not collapse.

3: The South Pole is *allegedly* a tourist destination. By that I mean that tourists are shown a spot on a featureless plain which has been called "the South Pole". If you look at the Flat Earth map, however, you will find that there is no such Pole, and that the alleged "Pole" could simply have been placed anywhere in Antarctica. I reckon that one would be immediately stopped if one tries to go further into the continent than the Pole.

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: polar orbit satellites

« on: December 28, 2017, 10:01:13 PM »

Satellites aren't real. They are debris from the Firmament, which float in currents on the ether, which creates the illusion of ordered flight. NASA simply claims that these objects are satellites, when in reality they are completely natural.

Use a backyard telescope to view the details of the ISS and tell me it is natural and just debris.

I was talking about satellites. I agree that the ISS isn't debris, and is probably man-made, but it is not a space station, because space does not exist. The ISS is an aircraft or balloon of some kind, which NASA has launched into the ether-pools on which the heavenly bodies move. Its movements are not caused by orbital mechanics, but are dictated by the movement of the ether.

4

Flat Earth Theory / Re: polar orbit satellites

« on: December 28, 2017, 09:03:10 AM »

Satellites aren't real. They are debris from the Firmament, which float in currents on the ether, which creates the illusion of ordered flight. NASA simply claims that these objects are satellites, when in reality they are completely natural.

5

Flat Earth Theory / Re: A new Flat Earth cosmological model (Celestial Ocean Theory)

« on: December 27, 2017, 05:21:20 PM »

Though I greatly admire the scientific theories we've developed here, I still believe there are some serious faults with our current cosmological model. I do not feel that stars or other celestial events are explored in any meaningful way, and many of our hypothesis are not consistent with Scripture. I have therefore devised a new cosmological model, the Celestial Ocean Theory, or COT. I have posted this before, but with all the new media attention we have received, I feel that an updated version is in order.



EXPLANATION:

The COT is unique as it presents a Celestial Ocean as the basis for our astronomical research. There exists a vast, spherical ocean which encapsulates the Flat Earth. This ocean is contained by the Firmament, a transparent wall which is supported by the Antarctic Ice Walls.
This Celestial Ocean is where the water of the Great Flood originated. The Floodgates of Heaven are parts of the Firmament which are weak, and prone to collapse. During the Great Flood, many of these floodgates opened. Sheol, the Hebrew Underworld referred to in the Old Testament, is below the Earth and the source of the Earth's internal heat. The Earth is supported by the biblical Pillars of the Earth, which stop it from collapsing into Sheol.

So how does this explain the stars? Simple: Sonoluminescence.
Sonoluminescence is the creation of light from sound waves in a liquid, caused by the rapid implosion of bubbles. This can be seen and demonstrated in a laboratory, and looks like this:



Looks familiar, yes? Stars are simply sonoluminescent spheres floating in the Celestial Ocean, which rotates to create the illusion of the Earth moving at night. They are created by soundwaves, which are in turn created by tectonic resonance originating in Sheol.

Now, I'd like to go more into the nature of the Firmament according to COT. You see, the stars are not embedded in the Firmament; the Firmament is simply a hard, glass-like material. This material is extremely strong, but brittle, and sometimes there are leaks in the Firmament. This can be proven by the existence of Serein (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serein_(meteorology), rain from cloudless skies. As of yet, the globeheads have no explanation for this phenomenon. I propose that tectonic resonance can cause the Firmament to weaken and shatter in places, causing rain without clouds.

How do I know this? Because pieces of the Firmament can be found on Earth in the form of Desert Glass. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_desert_glass). This is a glass-like material sometimes found in the world's deserts, and the globeheads have no explanation for it either. It is quite clear to me what it is: Pieces of the Firmament. Because the Celestial Ocean swirls around (Making the stars move), it is logical for the Firmament to be the weakest where the Ocean moves the fastest, but also far from the Antarctic Ice Walls. As a result, pieces of the Firmament is usually only found in the tropics.

I will be happy to debate and take feedback, though I'm fairly certain I've gotten most of it right. If any of you have any other ideas, feel free to post.

Sonoluminescence cannot account for stars. The light emitted lasts for an incredibly short amount of time. (picoseconds) Further, the bubbles that create them are very small. The light emitted would not be visible across any distance. The stars follow a predictable pattern year after year. Popping bubbles would be random.

Beyond that, everything else you say is based on religious interpretation that is not accepted by any major religious groups. In other words, its a neat story you're telling, but it isn't based on any scientific or accepted religious thought.

Clearly, you have not heard of MBSL (Multi-Bubble Sonoluminescence), which generates numerous oscillating bubbles that create sustained lights. If we allow enough energy into the system, then sustained sonoluminescent lights capable of being seen from the surface of the Disc-World becomes not just possible, but likely. This energy is easily supplied by tectonic shifts and currents in the Celestial Ocean.

6

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Why is earth special?

« on: December 27, 2017, 05:02:11 PM »

This is all explained by my COT hypothesis (Celestial Ocean Theory). I suggest you read up on it here: https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=8294.0

Now, to your questions.

1: Gravity does not exist; it is a product of a biased scientific community. Everything in observable physics can be explained through the laws of buoyancy, no gravity needed. The Universe, encased in the Celestial Ocean, accelerates upwards.

2: The planets do exist. Or, well, they do not exist in the same way NASA tells you. In my Celestial Ocean Theory, which I find the most reliable, the planets - as well as meteorites - are simply debris generated by cracks in the Firmament. This debris floats above the Sun and the Moon as the laws of buoyancy dictate.

3: The exact nature of the ice walls are unknown, but according to COT, they are not actually holding the oceans in; they are simply supporting the Firmament. We will probably never get to know the exact nature of the Ice Walls because Antarctica is heavily guarded and it is almost impossible for civilians to be allowed to reach the South Pole (Because it doesn't exist).

4: They have, but the scientific community is littered with frauds and corrupt shills. NASA and other pro-globe organizations force scientists to spread misinformation and to suppress evidence of the Flat Earth.

7

Flat Earth Theory / A new Flat Earth cosmological model (Celestial Ocean Theory)

« on: December 27, 2017, 04:29:01 PM »

Though I greatly admire the scientific theories we've developed here, I still believe there are some serious faults with our current cosmological model. I do not feel that stars or other celestial events are explored in any meaningful way, and many of our hypothesis are not consistent with Scripture. I have therefore devised a new cosmological model, the Celestial Ocean Theory, or COT. I have posted this before, but with all the new media attention we have received, I feel that an updated version is in order.



EXPLANATION:

The COT is unique as it presents a Celestial Ocean as the basis for our astronomical research. There exists a vast, spherical ocean which encapsulates the Flat Earth. This ocean is contained by the Firmament, a transparent wall which is supported by the Antarctic Ice Walls.
This Celestial Ocean is where the water of the Great Flood originated. The Floodgates of Heaven are parts of the Firmament which are weak, and prone to collapse. During the Great Flood, many of these floodgates opened. Sheol, the Hebrew Underworld referred to in the Old Testament, is below the Earth and the source of the Earth's internal heat. The Earth is supported by the biblical Pillars of the Earth, which stop it from collapsing into Sheol.

So how does this explain the stars? Simple: Sonoluminescence.
Sonoluminescence is the creation of light from sound waves in a liquid, caused by the rapid implosion of bubbles. This can be seen and demonstrated in a laboratory, and looks like this:



Looks familiar, yes? Stars are simply sonoluminescent spheres floating in the Celestial Ocean, which rotates to create the illusion of the Earth moving at night. They are created by soundwaves, which are in turn created by tectonic resonance originating in Sheol.

Now, I'd like to go more into the nature of the Firmament according to COT. You see, the stars are not embedded in the Firmament; the Firmament is simply a hard, glass-like material. This material is extremely strong, but brittle, and sometimes there are leaks in the Firmament. This can be proven by the existence of Serein (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serein_(meteorology), rain from cloudless skies. As of yet, the globeheads have no explanation for this phenomenon. I propose that tectonic resonance can cause the Firmament to weaken and shatter in places, causing rain without clouds.

How do I know this? Because pieces of the Firmament can be found on Earth in the form of Desert Glass. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_desert_glass). This is a glass-like material sometimes found in the world's deserts, and the globeheads have no explanation for it either. It is quite clear to me what it is: Pieces of the Firmament. Because the Celestial Ocean swirls around (Making the stars move), it is logical for the Firmament to be the weakest where the Ocean moves the fastest, but also far from the Antarctic Ice Walls. As a result, pieces of the Firmament is usually only found in the tropics.

I will be happy to debate and take feedback, though I'm fairly certain I've gotten most of it right. If any of you have any other ideas, feel free to post.