1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: polar orbit satellites

« on: December 31, 2017, 07:19:51 PM »

If you are magnanimous enough to consider how small humans actually are, then it makes sense that we are part of the "natural" order of things. Every innovation we have, every new idea, is really just mother nature taking her course. In that light, every sattelite is in fact a bit of naturally occuring space debris following complex etheric currents providing function and repeatability. What appears to be a "rock" to one person can in fact function quite well as a hammer for another. What one person considers to be "debris" can in fact be "state of the art" to another person. perhaps instead of trying to argue the "truth" we should be handing out trophies for participation.

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: polar orbit satellites

« on: December 31, 2017, 06:40:04 PM »

Satellites aren't real. They are debris from the Firmament, which float in currents on the ether, which creates the illusion of ordered flight. NASA simply claims that these objects are satellites, when in reality they are completely natural.

lol, that gave me a good belly laugh. thank you :-) maybe they aren't natural phenomena but actually projections of a forced upon us reality straight into out heads using the haarp antenna array. maybe vaccinations are actually micro recievers that lodge in our nueral cortex to make us more susceptible to those transmissions and thats why they are pushing the manditory vaccinations. maybe whenever the arrl raises funds to put an amatuer communications radio in orbit, a piece of floating natural phenomena appears that was never there before and follows the path of the proposed sattelite and then for some as of yet unexplained etheric reason begins to function like the aforemention sattelite was supposed too. maybe all the ham radio operators in the world are in on the conspiracy. it makes sense; honestly, have you ever seen the types of people who show up at ham conventions? is it any coincidence that humans taste a lot like ham? i think not.

3

Flat Earth Theory / polar orbit satellites

« on: December 26, 2017, 08:20:18 PM »

i spend quite a bit of time outside at night. i have noticed several polar orbit satellites. in fact, i have used these satellites for communication, and needed to time my calls for the space of time it takes one or the another to travel over the horizon. i would be super interested to know who's job it is to sit at the ice wall in the south and launch these satellites in "rapid" succesion in order to maintain consitent (to the fraction of a second) satellite traverses. how many satellites do we lose each year over the ice wall, and who funds the replacement satellites?