1
Flat Earth Theory / FE gravity pressure energy mass problems
« on: January 01, 2018, 09:14:27 AM »
So you use the idea of an accelerating flat earth. The thing is that that would cause problems based on sphere earth physics and some real world tests.
So let’s begin.
The infinite acceleration of the earth would require infinite amounts of energy to work. And even if it didn’t, the acceleration would compact the atmosphere more than on a spherical earth. This would mean that buoyancy would be impossible for use by any space craft. And with both the acceleration of the earth and the lack of the ability to orbit, space craft would have to also have to have infinite energy and mass. Also, I have yet to see any proof that disproves the idea of different parts of the earth showing different weights for the same object. Not only that, but you would have to use even more energy than normally to get the spacecraft up into space, as the substitute you use for gravity shows that you would weight the same in space as on the planet. This means you should weigh the same in the tallest tower of the world when compared to the ground level. I have yet to see any proof of that while using a spring based weighing device. Also no one has ever tried to measure whether there was a curvature of earth by making the flattest piece of land and measure for both curvature and weight difference (the weighing machine must be very accurate and must use a spring) to see if the flattening of the surface results in a different weight or not at different points. Please answer.
So let’s begin.
The infinite acceleration of the earth would require infinite amounts of energy to work. And even if it didn’t, the acceleration would compact the atmosphere more than on a spherical earth. This would mean that buoyancy would be impossible for use by any space craft. And with both the acceleration of the earth and the lack of the ability to orbit, space craft would have to also have to have infinite energy and mass. Also, I have yet to see any proof that disproves the idea of different parts of the earth showing different weights for the same object. Not only that, but you would have to use even more energy than normally to get the spacecraft up into space, as the substitute you use for gravity shows that you would weight the same in space as on the planet. This means you should weigh the same in the tallest tower of the world when compared to the ground level. I have yet to see any proof of that while using a spring based weighing device. Also no one has ever tried to measure whether there was a curvature of earth by making the flattest piece of land and measure for both curvature and weight difference (the weighing machine must be very accurate and must use a spring) to see if the flattening of the surface results in a different weight or not at different points. Please answer.