1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Are there other known or visible flat planets with domes?

« on: April 29, 2016, 04:22:35 PM »

here is Mars

Features Visible on the Martian Surface
This animation shows a complete rotation of Mars at intervals of 10° in longitude (corresponding to about 41 minutes of the planet's rotation). The Central Meridian is marked as a faint red line (passing through the centre of the planet from pole to pole). South is up and East is to the right, reflecting the appearance of the planet through a typical astronomical telescope.

http://www.nakedeyeplanets.com/mars-telescope.htm

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Are there other known or visible flat planets with domes?

« on: April 29, 2016, 04:19:27 PM »

The only celestial body close with a large enough angular diameter to discern a surface is the Moon,

Have you ever actually looked through a telescope before?

But you can see other planets with powerful enough telescopes.  and they are clearly spherical. 


Telescopic Venus  A simulated and much-magnified view of Venus as it appears through a telescope under moderate viewing conditions. The planet is seen in crescent phase, some 15% illuminated (phase = 0.15). Two more simulated views of the planet are shown below (all views on this page are shown at the same scale). The planet was filmed on May 15th 2004, during an evening apparition, when Venus was shining brilliantly in the Western sky after sunset, at an apparent magnitude of -4.5.
The unsteady appearance of the planet through the telescope is caused by a combination of turbulence in the Earth's atmosphere and rising heat currents from the ground and buildings (for more details see the section 'Seeing Conditions' below).

"The images were obtained by pointing a tripod-mounted videocamera directly into the eyepiece of an 8-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope; the eyepiece view was then magnified. The image is orientated with North upwards and towards the right, which approximately matches the Northern hemisphere view through a terrestrial telescope."
http://www.nakedeyeplanets.com/venus-telescope.htm

3

Flat Earth Community / Re: Gravity

« on: April 22, 2016, 05:55:31 PM »

At this point Sputnik you are debating with Three Round Earthers about this, we have no bias or objection to what you are trying to prove but by which you are trying to prove it, we do not debate the Theory the earth is round but how you came to that conclusion, on this site you really need to have a good grasp on science to debate against FE'ers, not because they respond well to it, but because every once and a while there is a FE'er who is very knowledgeable on the topic and will rip your "evidence" apart if your theories are not sound.

4

Flat Earth Community / Re: Gravity

« on: April 22, 2016, 05:36:45 PM »

It is too bad that this conversation is unable to go anywhere as the person who posted it had a solid idea of what the result they wanted when they made their question, however as he does not get said answer he instead plays the contradiction game instead of engaging in an actual argument.

In Other words Don't feed the Troll unless you insist on being apart of a Monty Python Sketch.

5

Flat Earth Community / Re: Gravity

« on: April 22, 2016, 04:14:11 PM »

however in this model there are no Gravitational forces, therefore it would not, You have to remember that you can not acount for something that is not a factor in this model. 

6

Flat Earth Community / Re: Gravity

« on: April 22, 2016, 03:48:06 PM »

As REer I see where you are trying to go but frame of reference diminishes this. The reason is because the object in the FE model is already and has always been accelerating at the same speed as the flat earth.  Because of this, it would not fall any faster then normal because you and the bullet were always accelerating upwards. 

However it does bring an interesting question to my mind about why we experience gravitational effects when we accelerate at great speeds.  What causes the effects felt from what RE's call "multiple G's" in the Flat earth model?

G's are even felt when accelerating in a vehicle so it can not be stress caused buy the air pressure or outside effects stressing on the car. For as I just explained if everything is accelerating together such as air in a car, the air is moving at the same speed as well.

Please if Anyone has an answer please let me know what causes what we experience when multiple gravitational Forces are put upon us from extreme acceleration if gravity is not a factor in the FE model. (Please note I know that the Gravity is a debated topic within the FE community and would only like an answer from those who are against gravity in the Model.)

7

Flat Earth Community / You guys are not so bad...

« on: January 12, 2016, 06:45:07 PM »

First off let me start by saying I am a RE'er, and while it first I came here to laugh at your theory, after reading many of your more administrative forums i have come to realize that while I do not agree with your science, I do agree with your method. I have met many individuals who practice what mainstream calls "pseudoscience."  Many are so far up their own behinds that they will not even let another side present their argument. However after reading your post about how you wish to run your site I find out that that is not the story at TFES.  I see several RE'ers actually involved with the inner workings of how the site is managed, and are very productive in the discussion.  It is very refreshing to see that even though we have opposing viewpoints, you let the forum be open RE'ers like myself.  It is nice to know that the members here at TFES are questioning the establishment, preforming their owns experiments and interpreting their own results, even if I do not agree with the interpretations, science is really about finding out what the truth is and I think we can agree that on both sides of this earth shape fence that no one here has the answers and we all just want the same thing, the truth.
That's all, I just wanted to give some praise to you for being open minded, and accepting of the opposition, because science will never advance if we have no one to test our theories against.