Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
So your personal arrogance won over scientific evidence? I wish you all the best my 'open minded and free thinking' friend.
Any modern university with the right equipment can proof you wrong on that on.
I can see for a 'Flat Earther' that the Moon landings would be difficult do digest. But where do we have the common nominator? Do you believe in John Glenn? Yuri Gagarin? The Wright Brothers?
It's not right. You can't see molecules through a visual microscope. It's all electronic microscopes and data are bring processed through a computer before you see it. Just like any pictures you see on your computer.
If the Earth is flat with no curvatures, you would be able to send a powerful laser beam from the British west coast to the american east coast. But you can't. However, you can reflect a laser beam on the moon because there's a laser reflector up there.
Easy now..
Point is that I find it strange that you narrow your trust to observations only visible to the eye. Then you will have a very narrow view on the world. And you know what I meant, so no need to be rude.
Again - I doubt that you'll be able to see bacterias with a normal microscope, but then let's use x-rays or molecules as an example. You can't see them so do they exist? Where do you draw the line?
"Seeing is believing" ..!?
You don't see bacterias, so bacterias don't exist?
On what do you base your belief that the Earth is Flat ?
I'm so green to the FET - me and my gf just uncovering some of this info a few days ago. The more I look into this (watch documentaries, youtube vids, and read on the net) the more I'm starting to believe the earth is indeed flat.
I don't know enough to elaborately debate anything (yet), but I am now hooked into an investigation - I look at the sun and moon in an entirely new way.
So far the biggest reason I believe the earth may be flat is the lack of any photo that has not been photoshopped proving curvature. There is not a single photo not taken with a fish eye lens that shows curvature. Nothing... This is alarming to me.
Secondly - all the mathematical "theory" involving the heavenly bodies in "outer space" are just that - theories. All these formulas with big numbers just look nonsensical, and even listening to some "round earther" trying to calculate the physical locations of objects supposedly millions of miles away based on a formula that is based off a "theory" just seems assinine to me. It's lunchtime - I will add more later
Seems to me that you would be well served to look into how theory is defined for different uses.
You dismiss all of the theory that supports a round Earth but, as you have admitted, you support the flat Earth theory. What, in your mind, makes the flat Earth theory any more valid than the theories that support a round Earth? Is it simply because you don't know how to use the math behind the theories that support a round Earth?
Sorry, but I'm still not convinced that the earth is flat. But I think that the discussions are both interesting and challenges your thinking :-)
I want to ask some of the flat earth believers if there's ANYTHING that could convince you that the earth is not flat? E.g. if you were invited into space to look for yourself or whatever. What would be 'the ultimate proof' for you that the earth is, in fact, not flat?
On what do you base your belief that the Earth is Flat ?
