1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Flat Earth and The Big Bang Theory

« on: August 24, 2018, 12:31:40 PM »

Why does being flat take more energy?

Galaxies are flat. You have no problem with that. The universe is flat.
https://www.space.com/34928-the-universe-is-flat-now-what.html

But you have a problem with the energy required to make a teeny weeny planet flat? 'Immense energy' compared to a universe being created? I've told round earthers a million times on this site, not to exaggerate.

The Galaxies are flat because they are spinning!!! But the "Flat Earth Theory" that the sun is spinning over the earth makes it stationary.

If the earth is stationary ( not spinning ) and is flat. then it is IMPOSSIBLE.

therefor the earth is a sphere and not a disk. You might say "if the earth is a sphere and spinning then why isn't it a disk? after all it is spinning!" Well that is waaaayyyy slower than a spinning galaxy.

The earth is actually slightly oblong due to its rotational force. This is consistent with the explanation of why galaxies are "flat".

You are right. It is, I forgot about that.

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: The Ice Wall

« on: August 24, 2018, 12:29:20 PM »

Imagine?

What do you mean imagine? Is your imagination empirical evidence? A thought experiment where you set the rules to be so that earth is round, isn't much of a though experiment.

Imagine Mars is full of little green men. Now tell me that there is no life on Mars.

Ok then. If you want an experiment, then the experiment is what you get.

Go to any lake and start walking alongside it. Eventually, you will do a complete turnaround it. If the lake was Antarctica then that is exactly what is going to happen.

( this is not a proof that the earth is flat or a sphere, it is just to clarify the OP's question

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Flat Earth and The Big Bang Theory

« on: August 18, 2018, 03:33:22 PM »

A sphere is far from simple.  It is not the simplest form of matter.  That doesn't even make sense.  Quarks are the simplest form of matter.  Or I suppose atoms if you wanna keep it in the atomic realm.


Secondly, disks are very common in space.  See rings, orbits, spiral galaxies, Dust belts..

Take a look at Suns and planets... Why aren't they flat???

It is because there dense enough to be a sphere. As the OP said sphere is the simplest for of matter.

Every object that has mass has a gravitational pull, and the easiest form for an object is a sphere. Because it can put an equal pull force on EVERY side

Explanation video ( I know it is based on a game but everything is shown is compared to real life )



SKIP TO 3:34 FOR THE EXPLANATION!

4

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Flat Earth and The Big Bang Theory

« on: August 18, 2018, 03:22:19 PM »

Why does being flat take more energy?

Galaxies are flat. You have no problem with that. The universe is flat.
https://www.space.com/34928-the-universe-is-flat-now-what.html

But you have a problem with the energy required to make a teeny weeny planet flat? 'Immense energy' compared to a universe being created? I've told round earthers a million times on this site, not to exaggerate.

The Galaxies are flat because they are spinning!!! But the "Flat Earth Theory" that the sun is spinning over the earth makes it stationary.

If the earth is stationary ( not spinning ) and is flat. then it is IMPOSSIBLE.

therefor the earth is a sphere and not a disk. You might say "if the earth is a sphere and spinning then why isn't it a disk? after all it is spinning!" Well that is waaaayyyy slower than a spinning galaxy.

5

Flat Earth Theory / Re: The Ice Wall

« on: August 18, 2018, 03:04:05 PM »

Yes, but we've moved on since then. If you strolled around with some modern-day mapping tools....

The OP asserts that should they make this hypothetical walk (I'm not sure anyone in the history of mankind has), that they would notice the general direction that they are going.

However, practically speaking, when the sea is on my right I am slowly making turns left, and so on.

I'm refuting this as nonsense. You'd have no idea as you walked along up spurs, down valleys, in and out, left and right ... your sense of direction with no points of reference other than the sea and snow would be useless. As the early map makers found.

Now you are saying, well what if you made the journey with theodolites and mapping tools and carefully plotted it all out. Well have you done this? Has the OP done this? The OP is saying surely I'd notice ... well neither he, nor I, nor anyone here, nor anyone you've ever met has done it ... so its a moot point.

Imagine this, It will make the OP's theory clearer.

Imagine you are on an island. You head up to it's shore and start walking to the right, the ocean will be on your right hand side and the island will be on the left hand side. The OP says that if we continue to walk around the island we will not hit a wall because the island is surrounded by water from all sides.

It is the same thing with Antarctica. it is a continent that is surrounded by water. Therefor making the Ice Wall theory invalid.

If the Earth is flat  then where are it's borders? are they in the sea?

There are no borders because the earth is a sphere. I can give you a lot of  examples.