The Flat Earth Society
Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Theory => Topic started by: yash.paz123 on June 28, 2017, 01:15:12 AM
-
The earth can't accelerate at different rates for each ball though. Velocity equals the initial velocity plus the square root of two times height times acceleration due to gravity. For the ten meter ball, initial velocity is zero, and will fall at:
t=0, h=10, v=0;
h=10, v=7;
h=9, v=20.28;
h=8, ....
..............
................
Same process repeated with the two balls.
The rate of change in velocity between two points in time between t=0 and t=ball2onthefloor is different for both of the balls. Such a task would require an accelerating disk where every atom of it increased or decreased velocity based on the acceleration of the ball in order to acheive such a simulation of gravity. in other words, this idea of the earth being a huge disk and that it needs to accelerate upwards for "gravity" is a silly and complex idea as to how a flat world would achieve "artificial gravity". You could simply say that the "flat earth" was spinning on its axis to produce a gravitational field.
The flat earth means that each part of the disk would be accelerating at different rates. it would mean moving every single atom of the world at a different velocity. But then that would also mean cutting the earth into tiny pieces.
One other thing, gravity is not a hoax, here are a few examples:
The moon (and all other satellites), orbits the earth every ~27 days. If gravity didn't exist, then the moon would shoot away from the earth at an approximate right angle due to the centrifugal force acting outwards with no gravity to pull it back in. Also, if the "flat earth" were actually accelerating upwards, then the earth should crash into the moon.
The Great Pyramid of Geeza (or however you spell it), since it takes the mass (not actually mass) of 3,600,000 tons, has been proven to SLOW DOWN TIME by a tiny bit. Due to gravitational time dilation, there can (almost) only be one explanation for this phenomena, which is that the incredible mass allows for a decent gravitational field to be created (technically 'created' wouldn't be the best choice of wording'). This is proof that gravity exists and is not a hoax.
PS. The reason why I mentioned the Pyramid instead of in space or near a black hole is because it is something that can be proven while still on earth. Why go to space to test this theory when by the time we are in space, we can just see how round the earth really is...
The closer you are to or the stronger the source of gravitation will cause this difference in time.
You can be traveling at 9.8m/s/s, it's simply impossible. You can't travel at acceleration. You can travel at a velocity that changes at a rate of 9.8m/s/s.
How can the moon be a source of gravity but not the earth? They are both made out of the same stuff. Atoms, Protons neutrons electrons, Hadrons, quarks gluons.
-
Not enough proof though.
-
Should check out this link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xu514u1HJw
And yes... I am a boy, not a girl.
-
Just a question:
In the UA theory, what causes the earth to accelerate? What force is exerted on the "flat earth".
-
Just a question:
In the UA theory, what causes the earth to accelerate? What force is exerted on the "flat earth".
Some flat earthers will say God. Others will say they don't know and will not make assumptions.
-
Whether god exists is a totally different debate.
-
As to this day, the evidence of there being a flat earth in existence is very weak...
-
Just a question:
In the UA theory, what causes the earth to accelerate? What force is exerted on the "flat earth".
They do talk about that some on the link I sent you in the other thread. It is worth noting that the cause of gravitation is not really understood either.
-
As to this day, the evidence of there being a flat earth in existence is very weak...
Yes.
-
Yeah I read it...Dark Energy. But dark energy only under the flat earth, or everywhere?
-
Occam's Razor suggests that the earth is round.
Or, a flat disk like shaped earth is lifted up through space at 9.8m/s from the bottom through the expansion of dark energy allowing an artificial downward source of gravity to created, thought the U.S. Government and NASA (so selective) decides to keep it all a secret and makes up this cover story about the earth being round.
Which do you think is more realistic?
-
Is anyone going to respond
-
I think a global earth is more realistic.
-
Exactly
-
I found this link on the Forum. Universal Acceleration is bogus in this situation.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/geophysics/missing-gravity.htm
-
Can one of the flat-earth believers please tell me what exactly is the volume and mass of this so-called "earth-disk".
-
Mass: 5,972,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms.
Volume: 260,000,000,000 cubic miles.
These are the facts.
-
Check your messages
-
five septillion, nine hundred seventy-two sextillion.
two hundred sixty billion.
-
What is the meaning of 'Check you messages'?
-
If the moon and the stars all have a gravitational pull, then why doesn't the "flat-earth"?
-
What is the meaning of 'Check you messages'?
Click (http://forum.tfes.org/index.php?action=pm)
-
Is anyone going to respond
Hi there, I would suggest you stop making double and triple posts. If people want to reply, they will. Spamming the FE fora is considered low-content posting and is against the rules. I would also suggest you take a look at the wiki and FAQ, as it is clear you are lacking in the fundamentals of FET. It will answer some of your questions, whether or not you like the answer is another story. You will find that if you ask the very basics of FE, members here will simply direct you to the wiki as they have answered those questions hundreds of times.
If you have a specific question, feel free to ask it. In the mean time, I would suggest reviewing the Equivalence Principle, acceleration using Special Relativity, as well as coordinate acceleration vs. proper acceleration.
-
None of these phenomena can exist or be true on a flat world:
Missing Gravitational Time Dilation on a non-rotating plain. It would mean that time would flow at the same rate on a flat earth that it does near a great big pyramid or a plain ground.
Varying Acceleration for all falling objects. It would mean cutting the world into pieces that accelerated at different rates.
Accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s^2. It would mean that all the star systems and constellations would be traveling downwards in the earths perspective, which is not true.
Universal Acceleration has not yet been remotely proven or provided any amount of backing evidence to support the theory.
The Moon orbits the earth, and if the earth were flat and were not a source of gravity, then the moon would shoot away from the earth due to excess centrifugal forces. Also, the earth would crash into the moon due to the upward velocity.
How do you explain time differences between two regions of the earth.
The Burj Khalifa Building in Dubai allows you to see two sunsets in one day if you see one sunset at sea level and take the super-fast elevator to the top of the building to witness a second sunset. This would only be possible on a round earth.
Hope that's enough proof.