The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Theory => Topic started by: sir paul malarkey on December 04, 2016, 08:46:11 AM

Title: Meteors
Post by: sir paul malarkey on December 04, 2016, 08:46:11 AM
i was recently engaged in a debate on twitter and the round farther sent me a pic of a meteor that crashed in russia. i did not have anything to go off of. can my new friends in the flat earth community help me out. 1) did the meteor come from outside the firmament? 2) is the asteroid belt within the firmament? 3) is the plan carried out by "nuts & volts" from the hunger games possible?
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: andruszkow on December 04, 2016, 02:41:52 PM
i was recently engaged in a debate on twitter and the round farther sent me a pic of a meteor that crashed in russia. i did not have anything to go off of. can my new friends in the flat earth community help me out. 1) did the meteor come from outside the firmament? 2) is the asteroid belt within the firmament? 3) is the plan carried out by "nuts & volts" from the hunger games possible?
I'm pretty sure sandokhan had proof that the tjelyabinsk meteor was in fact a tesla weapon discharge carried out by USA.
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: sir paul malarkey on December 04, 2016, 05:00:02 PM
Tesla weapon discharge? so a weapon somewhere in the sky using , rocks? or outside the firmament and they can open it to bombard us with rocks? @andruszkow
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: andruszkow on December 04, 2016, 06:09:47 PM
Tesla weapon discharge? so a weapon somewhere in the sky using , rocks? or outside the firmament and they can open it to bombard us with rocks? @andruszkow
Don't ask me, it's not my claim. It's just the only flat earth explanation I've heard. Be warned, you'll get bombarded with a Wall of text about the tunguska "event".
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: rabinoz on December 05, 2016, 12:14:03 AM
Tesla weapon discharge? so a weapon somewhere in the sky using , rocks? or outside the firmament and they can open it to bombard us with rocks? @andruszkow
Maybe what andruszkow should have said "sandokhan claimed that sandokhan had proof" - that's a completely different ball-game.
Sandokhan claims that sandokhan has proof of everything off-beat (he certainly has a different drum), usually by selectively quoting "experts" who very rarely would agree with the use sandokhan has for their writings.
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: TheTruthIsOnHere on December 05, 2016, 05:41:10 PM
Tesla weapon discharge? so a weapon somewhere in the sky using , rocks? or outside the firmament and they can open it to bombard us with rocks? @andruszkow
Maybe what andruszkow should have said "sandokhan claimed that sandokhan had proof" - that's a completely different ball-game.
Sandokhan claims that sandokhan has proof of everything off-beat (he certainly has a different drum), usually by selectively quoting "experts" who very rarely would agree with the use sandokhan has for their writings.

That's your take on it. Good thing you're not one of the experts and can't actually speak for them.
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: rabinoz on December 05, 2016, 11:47:37 PM
Tesla weapon discharge? so a weapon somewhere in the sky using , rocks? or outside the firmament and they can open it to bombard us with rocks? @andruszkow
Maybe what andruszkow should have said "sandokhan claimed that sandokhan had proof" - that's a completely different ball-game.
Sandokhan claims that sandokhan has proof of everything off-beat (he certainly has a different drum), usually by selectively quoting "experts" who very rarely would agree with the use sandokhan has for their writings.

That's your take on it. Good thing you're not one of the experts and can't actually speak for them.

So much that Sandokhan writes is little extracts taken from numerous publications of scientists many of whom have no idea of the spin he is putting on their writings.

Yes, that's my take on it, maybe I "can't actually speak for them", but I can read what else they write and judge Sandokhan's interpretation on that.
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: Heimlich Wulfenshtedt on December 07, 2016, 11:23:43 AM
Interesting. Whatever it was, it was influenced by gravity in the same way as normal matter. One only needs look at the video to see that it was a solid becoming vaporised.
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: sir paul malarkey on December 10, 2016, 03:32:42 AM
thanks for ruining the thread. I'm asking what is the origin of the meteors if we have a firmament (a dome)...does the "creator", "intelligent designer" throw rocks at us? is the firmament "in" only? is the atmosphere "in" only? russians are not the origin
Title: Re: Meteors
Post by: Berserk on December 10, 2016, 08:44:42 PM
thanks for ruining the thread. I'm asking what is the origin of the meteors if we have a firmament (a dome)...does the "creator", "intelligent designer" throw rocks at us? is the firmament "in" only? is the atmosphere "in" only? russians are not the origin

most likely if you actually believe in both.