The Flat Earth Society
Other Discussion Boards => Philosophy, Religion & Society => Topic started by: Lord Dave on May 13, 2016, 06:04:23 AM
-
http://www.unitedgungroup.com/auction/detail/auction/9/slug/george-zimmerman-s-gun-used-2-26-12?switch-mode=standard
Yeah, he's selling his gun and selling it on the point that he killed an unarmed teenager. I'm sorry but that's just wrong. You wanna sell the gun, fine, but don't promote its significance.
And its up to nearly a fucking million dollars?! How the... Who the fuck has that kind of cash for a politically chaged gun?
Not only that but...
On this day, 5/11/2016 exactly one year after the shooting attempt to end my life by BLM sympathizer Matthew Apperson
From what I can find, he was ahot at but never pulled the gun. In fact, he states it was not used despite being in the truck. Yet Apperson claimed george pointed it at him moments before and that's why Apperson took the shot.
-
You're telling me people can do what they want with their personal property? How awful...
-
Just because you can do something doesn't mean you you should. If I understand correctly, LD doesn't think Zimmerman should be disallowed from selling his gun, but that doesn't make him any less of a scumbag for doing it.
-
Doesn't everyone already think he's a scumbag? Why does this even matter?
-
I'm not mad he's selling it.
I'm mad he's using "It killed a teenager I was harassing!" As a way to get money. If he sold it as just a gun without attaching anything beyond physical description, I'd be fine. But nope.
He probably needs lawyer payment money.
-
So? He owns it, he can sell it, and he can advertise it (mostly) however he wants.
-
Um.. people make a lot more money for being scumbags on the daily. I don't see a problem here other than standard capitalism.
-
http://www.unitedgungroup.com/auction/detail/auction/9/slug/george-zimmerman-s-gun-used-2-26-12?switch-mode=standard
Yeah, he's selling his gun and selling it on the point that he killed an unarmed teenager. I'm sorry but that's just wrong. You wanna sell the gun, fine, but don't promote its significance.
And its up to nearly a fucking million dollars?! How the... Who the fuck has that kind of cash for a politically chaged gun?
Not only that but...
On this day, 5/11/2016 exactly one year after the shooting attempt to end my life by BLM sympathizer Matthew Apperson
From what I can find, he was ahot at but never pulled the gun. In fact, he states it was not used despite being in the truck. Yet Apperson claimed george pointed it at him moments before and that's why Apperson took the shot.
Yeah, that pesky Bill of Rights with its First Amendment. How dare he...
-
Not gonna lie, I laughed. This is quality trolling.
-
Um... this website says it's up to $65,039,000 right now...
This can't be real life.
-
People spamming fake bids on an internet auction site? Who would do such a thing oh my god
-
People spamming fake bids on an internet auction site? Who would do such a thing oh my god
What are you talking about? The bidders "Racist McShootface" and "Tamir Rice" are totally legit.
I'm actually surprised he got his gun back. From what I've heard, it is incredibly difficult to get any seized asset back after a trial, civil or criminal. It usually requires a lot of litigation that isn't worth it.
-
Can't flimflam the zimzam
Zimmerman knew this is what would happen. A bunch of tards would get mad he is selling it and he'd be in the news for days.
-
Somebody correct me if I have this wrong; the left-wing media, blm movement, and everyone that helped to make the Zimmerman/Martin case famous with their zeal to destroy Zimmerman, is now mad that Zimmerman is trying to sell the gun he used, while capitalizing on the notoriety they helped create.
I can't help but to smile.
-
http://www.unitedgungroup.com/auction/detail/auction/9/slug/george-zimmerman-s-gun-used-2-26-12?switch-mode=standard
Yeah, he's selling his gun and selling it on the point that he killed an unarmed teenager. I'm sorry but that's just wrong. You wanna sell the gun, fine, but don't promote its significance.
And its up to nearly a fucking million dollars?! How the... Who the fuck has that kind of cash for a politically chaged gun?
Not only that but...
On this day, 5/11/2016 exactly one year after the shooting attempt to end my life by BLM sympathizer Matthew Apperson
From what I can find, he was ahot at but never pulled the gun. In fact, he states it was not used despite being in the truck. Yet Apperson claimed george pointed it at him moments before and that's why Apperson took the shot.
Yeah, that pesky Bill of Rights with its First Amendment. How dare he...
The first amendment protects you from government actions against free speech. It does not make what you say morale.
For example:
I could rant about executing you and how all supporters of America should die. Doesn't make it right, just legal.
Somebody correct me if I have this wrong; the left-wing media, blm movement, and everyone that helped to make the Zimmerman/Martin case famous with their zeal to destroy Zimmerman, is now mad that Zimmerman is trying to sell the gun he used, while capitalizing on the notoriety they helped create.
I can't help but to smile.
Well, when ya stalk and shoot someone who posed no threat otherwise, one of those times will make national news.
-
And in a somewhat related story, someone with a pistol screws up and misses their opportunity for a payout.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-sammy-davis-jr-pistol-gun-buyback-20160511-story.html
"A vintage pistol that was once owned by legendary performer Sammy Davis Jr. was among 791 guns that the Los Angeles Police Department collected during a weekend gun buyback program, officials said."
Well, when ya stalk and shoot someone who posed no threat otherwise, one of those times will make national news.
From what I've read, the shooting part happened after the "no threat" part ended.
-
Well, when ya stalk and shoot someone who posed no threat otherwise, one of those times will make national news.
From what I've read, the shooting part happened after the "no threat" part ended.
Well, yeah. I mean, think of it from your perspective.
Some guy you don't know is following you. In a car. He has a gun. He will not leave you alone even after you try to evade him.
Do you
A) Keep running
B) Stand your ground and kick his ass.
-
Somebody correct me if I have this wrong; the left-wing media, blm movement, and everyone that helped to make the Zimmerman/Martin case famous with their zeal to destroy Zimmerman, is now mad that Zimmerman is trying to sell the gun he used, while capitalizing on the notoriety they helped create.
I can't help but to smile.
Reminds me of Anita Sarkeesian.
Well, when ya stalk and shoot someone who posed no threat otherwise, one of those times will make national news.
From what I've read, the shooting part happened after the "no threat" part ended.
Well, yeah. I mean, think of it from your perspective.
Some guy you don't know is following you. In a car. He has a gun. He will not leave you alone even after you try to evade him.
Do you
A) Keep running
B) Stand your ground and kick his ass.
If I knew he had a gun, I'd definitely keep running, although it's unlikely that Martin knew that.
-
Somebody correct me if I have this wrong; the left-wing media, blm movement, and everyone that helped to make the Zimmerman/Martin case famous with their zeal to destroy Zimmerman, is now mad that Zimmerman is trying to sell the gun he used, while capitalizing on the notoriety they helped create.
I can't help but to smile.
Reminds me of Anita Sarkeesian.
Well, when ya stalk and shoot someone who posed no threat otherwise, one of those times will make national news.
From what I've read, the shooting part happened after the "no threat" part ended.
Well, yeah. I mean, think of it from your perspective.
Some guy you don't know is following you. In a car. He has a gun. He will not leave you alone even after you try to evade him.
Do you
A) Keep running
B) Stand your ground and kick his ass.
If I knew he had a gun, I'd definitely keep running, although it's unlikely that Martin knew that.
He knew at some point. I think it was during the heated argument. I mean, if some guy was pissed at me and he had a gun on him, I'd be like "Fuck that." and attack for dear life. Running ain't gonna get me away from a bullet.
-
Somebody correct me if I have this wrong; the left-wing media, blm movement, and everyone that helped to make the Zimmerman/Martin case famous with their zeal to destroy Zimmerman, is now mad that Zimmerman is trying to sell the gun he used, while capitalizing on the notoriety they helped create.
I can't help but to smile.
Reminds me of Anita Sarkeesian.
Well, when ya stalk and shoot someone who posed no threat otherwise, one of those times will make national news.
From what I've read, the shooting part happened after the "no threat" part ended.
Well, yeah. I mean, think of it from your perspective.
Some guy you don't know is following you. In a car. He has a gun. He will not leave you alone even after you try to evade him.
Do you
A) Keep running
B) Stand your ground and kick his ass.
If I knew he had a gun, I'd definitely keep running, although it's unlikely that Martin knew that.
He knew at some point. I think it was during the heated argument. I mean, if some guy was pissed at me and he had a gun on him, I'd be like "Fuck that." and attack for dear life. Running ain't gonna get me away from a bullet.
Attacking someone who you know has a gun is just a form of suicide. Literally bringing your weak Dave fists to a gun fight.
-
Somebody correct me if I have this wrong; the left-wing media, blm movement, and everyone that helped to make the Zimmerman/Martin case famous with their zeal to destroy Zimmerman, is now mad that Zimmerman is trying to sell the gun he used, while capitalizing on the notoriety they helped create.
I can't help but to smile.
Reminds me of Anita Sarkeesian.
Well, when ya stalk and shoot someone who posed no threat otherwise, one of those times will make national news.
From what I've read, the shooting part happened after the "no threat" part ended.
Well, yeah. I mean, think of it from your perspective.
Some guy you don't know is following you. In a car. He has a gun. He will not leave you alone even after you try to evade him.
Do you
A) Keep running
B) Stand your ground and kick his ass.
If I knew he had a gun, I'd definitely keep running, although it's unlikely that Martin knew that.
He knew at some point. I think it was during the heated argument. I mean, if some guy was pissed at me and he had a gun on him, I'd be like "Fuck that." and attack for dear life. Running ain't gonna get me away from a bullet.
Attacking someone who you know has a gun is just a form of suicide. Literally bringing your weak Dave fists to a gun fight.
So is trying to outrun a bullet. Honestly, if I thought they would shoot me either way, I'd go with fighting.
-
So is trying to outrun a bullet. Honestly, if I thought they would shoot me either way, I'd go with fighting.
Run in a serpentine motion.
-
I'm not mad he's selling it.
I'm mad he's using "It killed a teenager I was harassing!" As a way to get money. If he sold it as just a gun without attaching anything beyond physical description, I'd be fine. But nope.
He probably needs lawyer payment money.
It was the other way around. Zimmerman, being the neighborhood watch dog, was checking his neighborhood when he saw the teenager (nearly 18) being in a spot he wasn't supposed to be. He called the police (the tell tell sign of someone who wants to murder someone [sarcasm]) and against the orders of dispatch he felt he needed to do something. The teenage was faster and doubled backed and confronted Zimmerman. He bested zimmerman's head into the sidewalk forcing him to pull his gun on him and fire.
-
Here's a video you can watch. Uncensored cussing is in it but the points are sound.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NuH_YuBtH40
-
We don't need yet another Zimmerman thread. He was acquitted. End of story. Book closed.
-
We don't need yet another Zimmerman thread. He was acquitted. End of story. Book closed.
I really wish this were true, but Zimmerman keeps doing dumb shit like this and ending up back in the news.
-
We don't need yet another Zimmerman thread. He was acquitted. End of story. Book closed.
I really wish this were true, but Zimmerman keeps doing dumb shit like this and ending up back in the news.
Only because he knows it triggers people like Dave. Zimmerman is a man who loves publicity and the media loves to give it to him.
-
We don't need yet another Zimmerman thread. He was acquitted. End of story. Book closed.
I really wish this were true, but Zimmerman keeps doing dumb shit like this and ending up back in the news.
Only because he knows it triggers people like Dave. Zimmerman is a man who loves publicity and the media loves to give it to him.
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
-
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
You're ridiculous.
You weren't there and are buying into "black kids can do no wrong" propaganda. He was acquitted. Stop being an emotional reactionary who doesn't understand the law.
-
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
You're ridiculous.
You weren't there and are buying into "black kids can do no wrong" propaganda. He was acquitted. Stop being an emotional reactionary who doesn't understand the law.
No one but George was. Well, and the dead guy. So all we have is his word and somw vague witness reports, half of which weren't reliable.
As for the law, yes, I understand the law quite well. A jury can vote however they want. If they got a literal confession from george of first degree murder, they could still vote to aquit. There is no law stating a jury needs to follow the law.
-
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
You're ridiculous.
You weren't there and are buying into "black kids can do no wrong" propaganda. He was acquitted. Stop being an emotional reactionary who doesn't understand the law.
No one but George was. Well, and the dead guy. So all we have is his word and somw vague witness reports, half of which weren't reliable.
As for the law, yes, I understand the law quite well. A jury can vote however they want. If they got a literal confession from george of first degree murder, they could still vote to aquit. There is no law stating a jury needs to follow the law.
So, why do you want to shoot him? Because he is insensitive and opportunistic?
-
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
You're ridiculous.
You weren't there and are buying into "black kids can do no wrong" propaganda. He was acquitted. Stop being an emotional reactionary who doesn't understand the law.
No one but George was. Well, and the dead guy. So all we have is his word and somw vague witness reports, half of which weren't reliable.
As for the law, yes, I understand the law quite well. A jury can vote however they want. If they got a literal confession from george of first degree murder, they could still vote to aquit. There is no law stating a jury needs to follow the law.
So, why do you want to shoot him? Because he is insensitive and opportunistic?
Poetic justice mostly. But I understand thats now how the world works.
I think I'm done raging.
-
Poetic justice mostly. But I understand thats now how the world works.
I think I'm done raging.
So you truly don't believe that Zimmerman could have been acting in self defense? You rather believe that he just followed some kid in his car, called the police, and then shot him for fun? Real neat logic there.
Even if you do think that Zimmerman provoked Martin into beating his ass, then I'd still like to know why you think Zimmerman should be murdered. Acting in self defense, regardless if you provoked a fight, doesn't equal a death sentence IMO.
Now he's just auctioning it off because he doesn't like the memory attached to it. Seems honest enough to me. Why not go get upset about real injustices rather than give Zimmerman any more attention?
-
Poetic justice mostly. But I understand thats now how the world works.
I think I'm done raging.
So you truly don't believe that Zimmerman could have been acting in self defense? You rather believe that he just followed some kid in his car, called the police, and then shot him for fun? Real neat logic there.
Even if you do think that Zimmerman provoked Martin into beating his ass, then I'd still like to know why you think Zimmerman should be murdered. Acting in self defense, regardless if you provoked a fight, doesn't equal a death sentence IMO.
Of course it does.
If you feel your life is in danger, you should have the right to defend yourself. So why is it not ok for Martin to feel like his life was in danger? If some guy with a gun was following me reletlessly, I'd assume he was gonna kidnap me, rape me, or murder me. Or all 3. Wouldn't you?
Yet because Martin threw the first punch, he's the bad guy. That shouldn't be how it should work if you're gonna have the right to stand your ground.
Now he's just auctioning it off because he doesn't like the memory attached to it. Seems honest enough to me. Why not go get upset about real injustices rather than give Zimmerman any more attention?
Where does he say that? He says its for fighting BLM and Clinton. He could have easily just pawned it or sold it without the "own a piece of history".
Its clear he does not regret the memories as he keeps bring it up.
-
Why would you regret the memory of you shooting some dumbass in self defense?
-
We don't need yet another Zimmerman thread. He was acquitted. End of story. Book closed.
I really wish this were true, but Zimmerman keeps doing dumb shit like this and ending up back in the news.
Only because he knows it triggers people like Dave. Zimmerman is a man who loves publicity and the media loves to give it to him.
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
Even if your rant is completely baseless? Apparently you haven't watched the video. You haven't even addressed it. You're like the FEs here. Unless you ARE one then that'll explain you're dismissive aditude to facts.
-
Of course it does.
If you feel your life is in danger, you should have the right to defend yourself. So why is it not ok for Martin to feel like his life was in danger? If some guy with a gun was following me reletlessly, I'd assume he was gonna kidnap me, rape me, or murder me. Or all 3. Wouldn't you?
Yet because Martin threw the first punch, he's the bad guy. That shouldn't be how it should work if you're gonna have the right to stand your ground.
As a woman who has encountered creepy followers, I can tell you that fighting them is not the correct response in the slightest. You try to lose them, find another person, knock on someone's door for help, call the police, call a friend to pick you up, and only resort to self defense when the person actually puts their hands on you first (or moves to do so). As we can see in this situation, turning to fight first only escalates things.
Where does he say that? He says its for fighting BLM and Clinton. He could have easily just pawned it or sold it without the "own a piece of history".
Its clear he does not regret the memories as he keeps bring it up.
Ah, well I read in a different article that he didn't feel comfortable owning the gun anymore because of the ordeal it put him through so he's selling it with the proceeds going towards those orgs.
BTW, sometimes people have to talk about their regrets in order to cope with them.
-
Rooster has extensive experience dealing with thugs. This is because Rooster lives in a ghetto.
Just thought I'd provide some background facts.
-
This is because Rooster lives in a ghetto.
No, I don't.
But I do work downtown.
-
This is because Rooster lives in a ghetto.
No, I don't.
Yeah, except you do.
Your ghetto is so ghetto even the squirrels have tiny little squirrel glocks
-
This is because Rooster lives in a ghetto.
No, I don't.
Yeah, except you do.
Okay, so you don't actually know what a ghetto is, that's fine.
-
Stefan Molyneux is what happens when an alt-right douchebag tries to pass himself off as an intellectual. My favorite thing about him is that he's been caught multiple times shilling his own YouTube rambling lectures, but apparently forgetting to sign into a different account first. There's no need to be watching his videos as if he's an authority on the subject.
-
Stefan Molyneux is what happens when an alt-right douchebag tries to pass himself off as an intellectual. My favorite thing about him is that he's been caught multiple times shilling his own YouTube rambling lectures, but apparently forgetting to sign into a different account first. There's no need to be watching his videos as if he's an authority on the subject.
Not an argument.
-
This is because Rooster lives in a ghetto.
No, I don't.
Yeah, except you do.
Okay, so you don't actually know what a ghetto is, that's fine.
No reason to be upset. Living in the ghetto is a badge of honor. Just like the several gunshot scars you've undoubtedly received during gang shootings.
-
Stefan Molyneux is what happens when an alt-right douchebag tries to pass himself off as an intellectual. My favorite thing about him is that he's been caught multiple times shilling his own YouTube rambling lectures, but apparently forgetting to sign into a different account first. There's no need to be watching his videos as if he's an authority on the subject.
Not an argument.
You're not an argument!
-
Why would Molyneux have to be an authority on the subject anyway? He does his research and you can verify his sources yourself. The only reason you wouldn't take him seriously is that instead of judging him by his content, you instead *gasp* judge him by his character. No, not even his character - his fanbase.
-
We don't need yet another Zimmerman thread. He was acquitted. End of story. Book closed.
I really wish this were true, but Zimmerman keeps doing dumb shit like this and ending up back in the news.
Only because he knows it triggers people like Dave. Zimmerman is a man who loves publicity and the media loves to give it to him.
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
Even if your rant is completely baseless? Apparently you haven't watched the video. You haven't even addressed it. You're like the FEs here. Unless you ARE one then that'll explain you're dismissive aditude to facts.
No, because I do not give a fuck what some raido bitch has to say. So unless that video has some kind of new witness that saw the whole thing or explains away that George was non-threatening in his following of a teenager, fuck off.
As a woman who has encountered creepy followers, I can tell you that fighting them is not the correct response in the slightest. You try to lose them, find another person, knock on someone's door for help, call the police, call a friend to pick you up, and only resort to self defense when the person actually puts their hands on you first (or moves to do so). As we can see in this situation, turning to fight first only escalates things.
To be fair, according to the George, the teenager was able to beat him to death so while running may be the safest way to not die, it's usually because you can't take said person in a fight.
However, yes, Martin should have kept running. And running. Because that worked, you know? Not like George kept finding him.
And I'm really sure people would happily open their door to some random black kid. Hey, there's been robberies in the area but this is just a scared kid. I'm sure he won't hurt me even though he can nearly kill a full grown, decently built man. As someone who has had a paniced man bang on his door, I know I wouldn't have opened it.
Not saying it was the best solution but I don't blame him for throwing the first punch
Ah, well I read in a different article that he didn't feel comfortable owning the gun anymore because of the ordeal it put him through so he's selling it with the proceeds going towards those orgs.
BTW, sometimes people have to talk about their regrets in order to cope with them.
I'd believe that if the ad wasn't glorifying what the gun was used for. And if it's just so he can get lots of money, well, fuck him.
-
We don't need yet another Zimmerman thread. He was acquitted. End of story. Book closed.
I really wish this were true, but Zimmerman keeps doing dumb shit like this and ending up back in the news.
Only because he knows it triggers people like Dave. Zimmerman is a man who loves publicity and the media loves to give it to him.
If I were less restrained and rich, I'd love to buy that gun so I can shoot him with it.
But I'm not so I will just rant.
Even if your rant is completely baseless? Apparently you haven't watched the video. You haven't even addressed it. You're like the FEs here. Unless you ARE one then that'll explain you're dismissive aditude to facts.
No, because I do not give a dime what some raido guy has to say. So unless that video has some kind of new witness that saw the whole thing or explains away that George was non-threatening in his following of a teenager.
So you're not going to listen to reason. The evidence found lined up with Zimmerman's story. He was already our of the car when he was told that he doesn't need to follow the guy and as the video explain dispatch can't give orders. They'll say that even if it was a scenario where some guy is hanging off a cliff and you wanted to help him. According to Zimmerman he stopped following him and decided to check the street sign to give to the police. As he went BACK into the car he was confronted by Martin. This is all in the video I provided. I guess you're too much of a coward to face facts or at the very least address the claims. In this country a person is innocent until proven innocent and as the courts found out he was indeed innocent.
-
To be fair, according to the George, the teenager was able to beat him to death so while running may be the safest way to not die, it's usually because you can't take said person in a fight.
lol, except Martin died. So even though he could take him in a fight it killed him. You should just assume someone you're about to fight has a gun or knife, just in case.
And you're saying what? That you should beat someone to death if they're following you? You just really want to murder someone it seems.
However, yes, Martin should have kept running. And running. Because that worked, you know? Not like George kept finding him.
Zimmerman is an overweight middle aged man. Martin definitely could have outrun him if he got off the road.
-
To be fair, according to the George, the teenager was able to beat him to death so while running may be the safest way to not die, it's usually because you can't take said person in a fight.
lol, except Martin died. So even though he could take him in a fight it killed him. You should just assume someone you're about to fight has a gun or knife, just in case.
And you're saying what? That you should beat someone to death if they're following you? You just really want to murder someone it seems.
However, yes, Martin should have kept running. And running. Because that worked, you know? Not like George kept finding him.
Zimmerman is an overweight middle aged man. Martin definitely could have outrun him if he got off the road.
I was in a dark place.
Still am but less so.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
-
Great thread
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
-
Great thread
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
Hmm, maybe if he didn't attack people on sight he wouldn't have been suspected.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
He's an asshole, and I feel like if there were no political context to this, you'd be calling him autistic.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
Hmm, maybe if he didn't attack people on sight he wouldn't have been suspected.
Dead.
He was suspected prior to attacking george. By george.
Also, I'm an admitted racist? Not saying your wrong but I don't remember where I said it. Or saying it.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
“They didn’t raise their son right. He attacked a complete stranger and attempted to kill him,” Zimmerman said of Martin.
Seeing that line alone, how can anyone disagree? Zimmerman isn't white either. And yeah, you probably shouldn't fucking attack someone even if they're following you. It's completely legal to follow someone. It's not legal to attack someone just because they're following you.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
Hmm, maybe if he didn't attack people on sight he wouldn't have been suspected.
Dead.
He was suspected prior to attacking george. By george.
Also, I'm an admitted racist? Not saying your wrong but I don't remember where I said it. Or saying it.
Hmm, maybe his suspicions were confirmed were the person he suspected attacked him.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
“They didn’t raise their son right. He attacked a complete stranger and attempted to kill him,” Zimmerman said of Martin.
Seeing that line alone, how can anyone disagree?
Tact, social norms, basic human decency, respect for the dead, sympathy for a grieving family, etc. Yes, as far as the law goes, Zimmerman was legally justified in using deadly force. That doesn't make him a hero whose actions need to be cheered or celebrated, it doesn't make Martin or his family villains who need to be further insulted or demonized, and it doesn't make this event anything less than a tragedy that shouldn't have happened.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html)
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
Hmm, maybe if he didn't attack people on sight he wouldn't have been suspected.
Dead.
He was suspected prior to attacking george. By george.
Also, I'm an admitted racist? Not saying your wrong but I don't remember where I said it. Or saying it.
Hmm, maybe his suspicions were confirmed were the person he suspected attacked him.
Maybe. Maybe Martin was the burgler that was terrorizing the neighborhood.
We will never know.
Anyway, I've said my peace so unless you have something you'd like to discuss further, I'm gonna bow out.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
“They didn’t raise their son right. He attacked a complete stranger and attempted to kill him,” Zimmerman said of Martin.
Seeing that line alone, how can anyone disagree?
Tact, social norms, basic human decency, respect for the dead, sympathy for a grieving family, etc. Yes, as far as the law goes, Zimmerman was legally justified in using deadly force. That doesn't make him a hero whose actions need to be cheered or celebrated, it doesn't make Martin or his family villains who need to be further insulted or demonized, and it doesn't make this event anything less than a tragedy that shouldn't have happened.
Seriously? Lord Dave doesn't even have tact when discussing Zimmerman, he literally said he would like to murder him. But you think Zimmerman should be held to a higher standard when complete strangers assume he's guilty and want to murder him?
Talk about double standards.
I never said he was a hero. Honestly, he sounds like an asshole. But he's right in this case, regardless of how hard that truth is.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
First place TM was acting suspiciously. Second Zimmerman was Hispanic, not white, and third so what? If the burglaries were made by a white gang then would you suspect a black guy? If the burglaries were made by teenagers are you going to suspect granny?
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html)
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
First place TM was acting suspiciously. Second Zimmerman was Hispanic, not white, and third so what? If the burglaries were made by a white gang then would you suspect a black guy? If the burglaries were made by teenagers are you going to suspect granny?
.... huh?
I'm very confused.
My point is that the burglaries were suspected of being made by a black person. Thus, any suspicious looking black people would be more of a concern than any other race. If the burglaries were made by a white gang, then any white people looking suspicious would be more of a concern.
I never mentioned Zimmerman's race as I do not believe he racially profiled. He profiled based on previous crime suspects (a black person) which in itself is not racial profiling as the criminal was suspected of being a black male so thus any black male could be it. Racial profiling would be suspecting any black male without any idea what the race of the burglar was.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html)
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
First place TM was acting suspiciously. Second Zimmerman was Hispanic, not white, and third so what? If the burglaries were made by a white gang then would you suspect a black guy? If the burglaries were made by teenagers are you going to suspect granny?
.... huh?
I'm very confused.
My point is that the burglaries were suspected of being made by a black person. Thus, any suspicious looking black people would be more of a concern than any other race. If the burglaries were made by a white gang, then any white people looking suspicious would be more of a concern.
I never mentioned Zimmerman's race as I do not believe he racially profiled. He profiled based on previous crime suspects (a black person) which in itself is not racial profiling as the criminal was suspected of being a black male so thus any black male could be it. Racial profiling would be suspecting any black male without any idea what the race of the burglar was.
Oh ok. Sorry. Whenever I see anything that looks like liberal logic I get mad.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/17/george-zimmerman-taunts-trayvon-martin-s-parents-they-didn-t-raise-their-son-right.html)
He's right.
Should have raised him white.
I don't see how that is relevant, but I suppose I can't expect much from an admitted racist.
The burglaries were reported as being from a black person. So if Martin was white, he wouldn't have been suspected.
First place TM was acting suspiciously. Second Zimmerman was Hispanic, not white, and third so what? If the burglaries were made by a white gang then would you suspect a black guy? If the burglaries were made by teenagers are you going to suspect granny?
.... huh?
I'm very confused.
My point is that the burglaries were suspected of being made by a black person. Thus, any suspicious looking black people would be more of a concern than any other race. If the burglaries were made by a white gang, then any white people looking suspicious would be more of a concern.
I never mentioned Zimmerman's race as I do not believe he racially profiled. He profiled based on previous crime suspects (a black person) which in itself is not racial profiling as the criminal was suspected of being a black male so thus any black male could be it. Racial profiling would be suspecting any black male without any idea what the race of the burglar was.
Oh ok. Sorry. Whenever I see anything that looks like liberal logic I get mad.
It's fine. Conservative logic does that to me.
See, we aren't so different. We're just being manipulated by the media to hate each other instead of speaki g rationally until we find a solution.