If the earth is flat why does Australia need radio telescopes like "the dish"in Parkes NSW?I could really put my foot in it and say it's much worse that just the "the Dish" at Parkes and the "Australia Telescope Compact Array" at Narrabri,
Wouldn't you just need one on earth to point anywhere in the sky?
Do they not point at parts of space not able to be viewed by other continents?
The NASA cover up seems to get more epic the more you dig. If you look at it that way. I don't see how that is possible considering the amount of people that are involved.But that's only my opinion.And it is an opinion that also matches reality. There's no way they could sustain a cover-up when most of the people they employ don't even belong to them.
Knowledge is extremely compartmentalized in "government" works. None are much aware of anything outside the limited scope of their job responsibilities.The NASA cover up seems to get more epic the more you dig. If you look at it that way. I don't see how that is possible considering the amount of people that are involved.But that's only my opinion.And it is an opinion that also matches reality. There's no way they could sustain a cover-up when most of the people they employ don't even belong to them.
Take care about these sattelites:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/2ypch9w.jpg)
See the orbit: South, North, wes, east. All of the sattelites turning around the earth. TThe world is flat so you can watch the televizion from everywhere.
Look the channels on 24 hours/7 days. If is it a globe, it is impossible you see the signal of sattelite when it is on the opposite side of the earth.
Signals are weak on Australia because it is far away from the other countries of the world and sattelites usually near on the others.
Oh don't be silly, TV satellite dishes in Australia look like this -------->>>>>> There are some base stations like the one below for the uplink to the relevant satellite: (http://i.nextmedia.com.au/Utils/ImageResizer.ashx?n=http%3a%2f%2fi.nextmedia.com.au%2fgalleries%2fIMG_5540total.jpg&h=450&w=800&c=0&s=0) Optus' satellite earth station facility in Belrose, Sydney | (http://www.exploroz.com/images/Articles/79_L__TN300F.jpg?_114673) |
Not like this massive "Canberra Deep Space Communication Complex" at Tidbinbilla! -------->>>>>>. This is used for communication with NASA deep space missions, when the other tracking stations (in the California, United States and in Madrid, Spain) are "facing the wrong way". Yes, I know a little about . I have at least been there and know it exists! | (http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w433/RabDownunder/Canberra%20Deep%20Space%20Communication%20Complex_zps2ild8bd3.jpg) Canberra Deep Space Communication Complex |
Take care about these sattelites:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/2ypch9w.jpg)
See the orbit: South, North, wes, east. All of the sattelites turning around the earth. TThe world is flat so you can watch the televizion from everywhere.
Look the channels on 24 hours/7 days. If is it a globe, it is impossible you see the signal of sattelite when it is on the opposite side of the earth.
Signals are weak on Australia because it is far away from the other countries of the world and sattelites usually near on the others.
May I assume from your post above that you believe in BOTH a flat earth AND satellites? If so, that will be unusual among flat earthers, which is why I ask. Want to be sure I'm understanding correctly.
Take care about these sattelites:Most satellites used for broadcast are in a geostationary orbit.
(http://i67.tinypic.com/2ypch9w.jpg)
See the orbit: South, North, wes, east. All of the sattelites turning around the earth. TThe world is flat so you can watch the televizion from everywhere.
Look the channels on 24 hours/7 days. If is it a globe, it is impossible you see the signal of sattelite when it is on the opposite side of the earth.
Signals are weak on Australia because it is far away from the other countries of the world and sattelites usually near on the others.
What holds the satellites up in your theory? Why don't they come crashing back down to your flat earth?May I assume from your post above that you believe in BOTH a flat earth AND satellites? If so, that will be unusual among flat earthers, which is why I ask. Want to be sure I'm understanding correctly.
They usually refute the sattelites. But that depends on the route of the sattelites and the place of them. I'm thinking that "some of" sattelites are exist but not on a place estimated. And most of them aren't exist specially NASA and ESA sattelites aren't exist. But tv sattelites are exist because money opens every kind of door.
What holds the satellites up in your theory? Why don't they come crashing back down to your flat earth?May I assume from your post above that you believe in BOTH a flat earth AND satellites? If so, that will be unusual among flat earthers, which is why I ask. Want to be sure I'm understanding correctly.
They usually refute the sattelites. But that depends on the route of the sattelites and the place of them. I'm thinking that "some of" sattelites are exist but not on a place estimated. And most of them aren't exist specially NASA and ESA sattelites aren't exist. But tv sattelites are exist because money opens every kind of door.
I guess you need a lot of that trying to prop up the FE model. Try explaining moon phases and eclipses without lots of it!What holds the satellites up in your theory? Why don't they come crashing back down to your flat earth?May I assume from your post above that you believe in BOTH a flat earth AND satellites? If so, that will be unusual among flat earthers, which is why I ask. Want to be sure I'm understanding correctly.
They usually refute the sattelites. But that depends on the route of the sattelites and the place of them. I'm thinking that "some of" sattelites are exist but not on a place estimated. And most of them aren't exist specially NASA and ESA sattelites aren't exist. But tv sattelites are exist because money opens every kind of door.
Hopes and dreams hold the satellites up. Plastering on a little bullshit helps too in case the hopes and dreams start to fall apart.
I guess you need a lot of that trying to prop up the FE model. Try explaining moon phases and eclipses without lots of it!What holds the satellites up in your theory? Why don't they come crashing back down to your flat earth?May I assume from your post above that you believe in BOTH a flat earth AND satellites? If so, that will be unusual among flat earthers, which is why I ask. Want to be sure I'm understanding correctly.
They usually refute the sattelites. But that depends on the route of the sattelites and the place of them. I'm thinking that "some of" sattelites are exist but not on a place estimated. And most of them aren't exist specially NASA and ESA sattelites aren't exist. But tv sattelites are exist because money opens every kind of door.
Hopes and dreams hold the satellites up. Plastering on a little bullshit helps too in case the hopes and dreams start to fall apart.
Knowledge is extremely compartmentalized in "government" works. None are much aware of anything outside the limited scope of their job responsibilities.The NASA cover up seems to get more epic the more you dig. If you look at it that way. I don't see how that is possible considering the amount of people that are involved.But that's only my opinion.And it is an opinion that also matches reality. There's no way they could sustain a cover-up when most of the people they employ don't even belong to them.