The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Theory => Topic started by: Earthisround on February 15, 2016, 12:56:04 AM

Title: RE gravity vs FE acceleration
Post by: Earthisround on February 15, 2016, 12:56:04 AM: I started a new thread earlier about how gravity in FE works with acceleration, and the answer I got was that we accelerate at the same rate which is why the force we feel is constant. But I do have another question which i would like answered. If the earth is accelerating to produce the gravity we feel, then the force should be constant around the whole surface of the earth, right? If so, then how is it that an area in Canada, the Hudson Bay, has less gravitational force than the average measured in the earth?
(source #1: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/05/070511-weird-gravity.html) (source #2: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11826-satellites-solve-mystery-of-low-gravity-over-canada/) (source #3: http://web.gps.caltech.edu/classes/ge102/papers/Tamisiea2007.pdf)

A commonly accepted explanation, from what I have learned, is that massive glaciers that provided the mass in that area melted at the end of the last ice age and flowed away from that location, but there are other explanations for it, of that I am sure.

Anyway, I would like an answer for this, and I will not accept people who state that it is false because NASA is in on it or whatever, I would like a logical, scientific explanation, supported by evidence. That should not be too much to ask.
Title: Re: RE gravity vs FE acceleration
Post by: juner on February 15, 2016, 01:28:46 AM: Most likely inconsistencies in measurements, or improperly calibrated equipment.
Title: Re: RE gravity vs FE acceleration
Post by: Earthisround on February 15, 2016, 01:30:44 PM: Quote from: junker on February 15, 2016, 01:28:46 AM
Most likely inconsistencies in measurements, or improperly calibrated equipment.

No, the lack of gravity has been confirmed by scientists and satellite data. Do you have an answer or not?
Title: Re: RE gravity vs FE acceleration
Post by: rabinoz on February 16, 2016, 10:24:39 PM: Quote from: Earthisround on February 15, 2016, 01:30:44 PM
Quote from: junker on February 15, 2016, 01:28:46 AM
Most likely inconsistencies in measurements, or improperly calibrated equipment.
No, the lack of gravity has been confirmed by scientists and satellite data. Do you have an answer or not?
You did look up "the Wiki"?
Quote from: The Wiki
see http://wiki.tfes.org/Universal_Acceleration#Tidal_Effects (http://wiki.tfes.org/Universal_Acceleration#Tidal_Effects)
Tidal Effects
In the FE universe, gravitation (not gravity) exists in other celestial bodies. The gravitational pull of the stars, for example, causes observable tidal effects on Earth.
Q: Why does gravity vary with altitude?
A: The moon and stars have a slight gravitational pull.
Any the wiser? Since this is the Q&A we can hardly debate it.
Title: Re: RE gravity vs FE acceleration
Post by: Earthisround on February 17, 2016, 11:23:03 AM: Quote from: rabinoz on February 16, 2016, 10:24:39 PM
Quote from: Earthisround on February 15, 2016, 01:30:44 PM
Quote from: junker on February 15, 2016, 01:28:46 AM
Most likely inconsistencies in measurements, or improperly calibrated equipment.
No, the lack of gravity has been confirmed by scientists and satellite data. Do you have an answer or not?
You did look up "the Wiki"?
Quote from: The Wiki
see http://wiki.tfes.org/Universal_Acceleration#Tidal_Effects (http://wiki.tfes.org/Universal_Acceleration#Tidal_Effects)
Tidal Effects
In the FE universe, gravitation (not gravity) exists in other celestial bodies. The gravitational pull of the stars, for example, causes observable tidal effects on Earth.
Q: Why does gravity vary with altitude?
A: The moon and stars have a slight gravitational pull.
Any the wiser? Since this is the Q&A we can hardly debate it.

The lack of gravity is at ground level, and that is not really an answer, since they have no data to support it, it is merely a speculation. Besides, if gravity doesnt exist, what causes the gravitational pull of the stars to be so strong that they can affect us from hundreds of light years away.
Title: Re: RE gravity vs FE acceleration
Post by: magic on February 21, 2016, 09:40:31 PM: Earthisround,
The only demonstrable evidence of gravity is what we observe on Earth. Taking this exclusive demonstration of gravity and creating a narrative to which other bodies are influenced by such a force is a farce.

There are too many contradictions in how gravity applies to give any certain definition to it. However, a narrative is required for the public to which we arrive at this impasse.
Title: Re: RE gravity vs FE acceleration
Post by: Earthisround on February 22, 2016, 08:21:04 PM: I do not understand what you are trying to say. You said that we can find evidence for what you observe directly, but we have observed this phenomenon! We've measured it using highly sophisticated equipment and we've proved that the area around hudson bay has less average gravity than the rest of the earth. None of you have provided any verifiable claims or evidence to counter this, because it clearly does not fit with the FE model, but as I explained in the first post, it does fit with the RE model