That model is a simple GIF merely designed to illustrate a concept. It doesn't accurately reflect the movements of the sun and the moon.
This is an often asked question that I haven'tansweredcopy/pasted in awhile.
As the sun circles above the flat earth it moves closer and further from the North Pole. This explains the six months of day and night in the north. To explain the six months of days and nights on the rim is a bit more involved. As the sun journeys north and south, it also rises and falls so slightly it's nearly imperceivable. In the North, the sun is at its closest to earth and in the South it's at its furthest. Now, to explain how the sun can be seen from all of the rim at one time, simply take a look into your coffee cup:
http://www.saltire.com/HTML5/HTML5%20apps/Light%20and%20Reflections/Caustic.html
Just as light reflects around the entire rim of your drink, so it does around the rim of the earth. I believe it's the firmament itself that reflects this light but others attribute it to how the light waves interact with with aether or even the ice wall itself.
How do you know Amundsen and Scott made it to the South Pole? Did the people that tell you that the earth is round also tell you this?
from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy#Al-Biruni (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy#Al-Biruni)Yes, I know it's from that terrible Wikipedia!
Al-Biruni
Of the medieval Persian Abu Rayhan al-Biruni (973–1048) it is said:
"Important contributions to geodesy and geography were also made by Biruni. He introduced techniques to measure the earth and distances on it using triangulation. He found the radius of the earth to be 6339.6 km, a value not obtained in the West until the 16th century. His Masudic canon contains a table giving the coordinates of six hundred places, almost all of which he had direct knowledge."
Pongo is right to question whether Scott and Amundsen truly visited the pole. The magnetic field lines are vertical in Antarctica and the compass does not work in that area.The magnetic field lines might be vertical right over the south magnetic pole, but not everywhere in Antarctica.
Now, to explain how the sun can be seen from all of the rim at one time, simply take a look into your coffee cup:
http://www.saltire.com/HTML5/HTML5%20apps/Light%20and%20Reflections/Caustic.html
Just as light reflects around the entire rim of your drink, so it does around the rim of the earth. I believe it's the firmament itself that reflects this light but others attribute it to how the light waves interact with with aether or even the ice wall itself.
I don't want this thread to get distracted by theories about the south pole. To get back to the topic I want to raise some questions for Pongo.Now, to explain how the sun can be seen from all of the rim at one time, simply take a look into your coffee cup:
http://www.saltire.com/HTML5/HTML5%20apps/Light%20and%20Reflections/Caustic.html
Just as light reflects around the entire rim of your drink, so it does around the rim of the earth. I believe it's the firmament itself that reflects this light but others attribute it to how the light waves interact with with aether or even the ice wall itself.
In your coffee cup example the lightsource is placed outside of the coffee cup/flat earth. The flat earth society claims in their wiki that the lightsource/sun is hovering above the coffee cup/earth. This doesn't make sense to me.
Of course the deception to hide the earth's shape started when?
Must have been well before old Ptolemy's time and must have been in the Islamic world where modern geodetic is said to have started!
The magnetic field lines might be vertical right over the south magnetic pole, but not everywhere in Antarctica.
But you seem to have an obsession with the magnetic compass. They may have used one the early in the expedition,
but they had available an excellent natural compass!
All they needed was the sun and and an accurate clock, and they had a 24 hour sun!
Of course the final pole location was performed using sun altitude measurements.
The description of this process makes fascinating reading in Amundsen's report.
The magnetic field lines might be vertical right over the south magnetic pole, but not everywhere in Antarctica.Yes, the field lines are vertical everywhere in Antarctica. There is only a strip of land where the compass even works. | From your RE model: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d5/Geodynamo_Between_Reversals.gif) |
21.2 Magnetic Compasses
Magnetic compasses must be modified for use in polar latitudes by reweighting the needle. As the compass gets closer to the South Pole, the south-seeking end of the needle is pulled downward toward the earth and will drag on its enclosure unless the proper nonmagnetic counterweight (copper wire) is added to the northseeking
end.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Field parties may elect to travel by using a Grid North system (see the “Grid North” section), versus a magnetic or truenorth(1) system.
from: https://earthref.org/ERESE/projects/GOLF182/reports/report-compass-confusion.htm (https://earthref.org/ERESE/projects/GOLF182/reports/report-compass-confusion.htm) The following is from McMurdo Station, which is an extreme case, being relative close to the South Magnetic Pole. Quote
| Location of McMurdo Station (https://earthref.org/images/ERESE/projects/GOLF182/general/antarctica.jpg) |
But you seem to have an obsession with the magnetic compass. They may have used one the early in the expedition,
but they had available an excellent natural compass!
All they needed was the sun and and an accurate clock, and they had a 24 hour sun!
Of course the final pole location was performed using sun altitude measurements.
The description of this process makes fascinating reading in Amundsen's report.
So the only way they actually knew they were at the South Pole was by looking at the sun and assuming that they were on a Round Earth. Got it.Well yes I got that long ago - took you a while(2)! But please tell me just how navigators from "time immemorial" have navigated the ocean!
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :D
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :D
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia
Why are you so sure you can? They are on opposite sides of the earth on a round earth too. The charts seem to suggest you made up that you can see the sun in both places at once.
(http://i65.tinypic.com/e8pk5l.png)
How do you know you can see the sun in both places at once? Have you tested it yourself, or were you told that?
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :DWhy stop with "How can the sun be seen more than 12 hours a day in the southern hemisphere?" Why not "How can the sun be seen 24 hours a day at both the North Pole and the South Pole on the same date?" No problem, it happens for a few days around every equinox! At the equinoxes the sun just skirts a little above the horizon all day at both poles. I do believe that "timeanddate.com" is so widely used that anyone seriously questioning its accuracy would be scorned. As for "Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory?", probably, but they will completely ignore it, claim that there are really two suns ( ::) with exactly the same sunspots patterns? ::)) claim we are lying or simply "prove it"! | Take a look at this day/night diagram: Day and Night World Map The map below shows the current position of the Sun and the Moon. It shows which parts of the Earth are in daylight and which are in night. (http://www.timeanddate.com/scripts/sunmap.php?iso=20160321T1200) UTC time = Monday, 21 March 2016 at 12:00:00 Noon. South Pole local time = Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 1:00:00 AM. From: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html (http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html) |
BTW
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :DWhy stop with "How can the sun be seen more than 12 hours a day in the southern hemisphere?"
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia while, at the same time, it is night at the north pole?
And please stop messing this thread up with discussions about the south pole, you can open another thread to argue these issues.
Why not "How can the sun be seen 24 hours a day at both the North Pole and the South Pole on the same date?"
No problem, it happens for a few days around every equinox! At the equinoxes the sun just skirts a little above the horizon all day at both poles.
I do believe that "timeanddate.com" is so widely used that anyone seriously questioning its accuracy would be scorned.
As for "Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory?", probably, but
they will completely ignore it,
claim that there are really two suns ( ::) with exactly the same sunspots patterns? ::))
claim we are lying or
simply "prove it"! Take a look at this day/night diagram:Day and Night World Map
The map below shows the current position of the Sun and the Moon.
It shows which parts of the Earth are in daylight and which are in night.(http://www.timeanddate.com/scripts/sunmap.php?iso=20160321T1200)UTC time = Monday, 21 March 2016 at 12:00:00 Noon.
South Pole local time = Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 1:00:00 AM.From: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html (http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html)You complain "stop messing this thread up with discussions about the south pole".
Last I heard the south pole was in the southern hemisphere and the thread is: "How can the sun be seen more than 12 hours a day in the southern hemisphere?"
BTW
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :DWhy stop with "How can the sun be seen more than 12 hours a day in the southern hemisphere?"
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia while, at the same time, it is night at the north pole?
And please stop messing this thread up with discussions about the south pole, you can open another thread to argue these issues.
Why not "How can the sun be seen 24 hours a day at both the North Pole and the South Pole on the same date?"
No problem, it happens for a few days around every equinox! At the equinoxes the sun just skirts a little above the horizon all day at both poles.
I do believe that "timeanddate.com" is so widely used that anyone seriously questioning its accuracy would be scorned.
As for "Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory?", probably, but
they will completely ignore it,
claim that there are really two suns ( ::) with exactly the same sunspots patterns? ::))
claim we are lying or
simply "prove it"! Take a look at this day/night diagram:Day and Night World Map
The map below shows the current position of the Sun and the Moon.
It shows which parts of the Earth are in daylight and which are in night.(http://www.timeanddate.com/scripts/sunmap.php?iso=20160321T1200)UTC time = Monday, 21 March 2016 at 12:00:00 Noon.
South Pole local time = Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 1:00:00 AM.From: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html (http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html)You complain "stop messing this thread up with discussions about the south pole".
Last I heard the south pole was in the southern hemisphere and the thread is: "How can the sun be seen more than 12 hours a day in the southern hemisphere?"
Sorry bavcol and rabinoz,
I didn’t mean to derail the thread, but I thought the topic about “Sun in Rio Grande – dark in Europe – Sun in Adelaide – all at the same time” was relevant for the discussion.
I came here to seek independent information about the nature of our World, since I certainly don’t believe governmental institutions are independent. So thanks to TFES for setting up the site!
However, I have been very disappointed with the quality level of the answers being posted here. I’m starting to doubt the independency and integrity of TFES. You are putting all freethinkers, like the 9/11 truthers, in an extremely bad light. Very convenient for the US government..
- Why is it that nobody from TFES exists in real life? All other truthers proudly stand behind their thinking.
Who are sponsoring your activities?
Why did Obama make ‘free commercial’ for TFES? Would have been more logical for him to just ignore you!?
Why do you avoid reflecting on obvious observations and questions like the ones in this thread? Seems to me like you’re just working from a pre-made manuscript, and are not distracted by any input/insights/observations. Seems like it can’t be goofy enough.
Can TFES proof that you’re not just paid by the US government as an excuse to put all other freethinkers in the same nutcase basket as TFES? Are you professional trolls?
And now back to the question about how we can see the sun in South America and Australia (but not in Europe) at the same time? I would like to understand this better.
You complain "stop messing this thread up with discussions about the south pole".
Last I heard the south pole was in the southern hemisphere and the thread is: "How can the sun be seen more than 12 hours a day in the southern hemisphere?"
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :D
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia
Why are you so sure you can? They are on opposite sides of the earth on a round earth too. The charts seem to suggest you made up that you can see the sun in both places at once.
(http://i65.tinypic.com/e8pk5l.png)
How do you know you can see the sun in both places at once? Have you tested it yourself, or were you told that?
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :DWhy are you so sure you can? They are on opposite sides of the earth on a round earth too. The charts seem to suggest you made up that you can see the sun in both places at once.
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia
(http://i65.tinypic.com/e8pk5l.png)
How do you know you can see the sun in both places at once? Have you tested it yourself, or were you told that?
The site (http://www.gaisma.com (http://www.gaisma.com)) seems to have no way to show the day-night map for some date other than today. The site http://www.timeanddate.com/ (http://www.timeanddate.com/) allows other dates. I have selected UTC 12:00:00 Monday, 21 March 2016. The sun can be seen overhead on the Equator at 0°E, 0°N. The day-night map on the right shows that the sun will be visible all day at both poles on the March Equinox. The same happens on the September Equinox. At both of these times, right at the poles the sun just skirts the horizon. Yes, you will ask, "Have I seen it?", No! I haven't. But, I might well ask numerous questions about the Flat Earth Hypothesis and the answers found in the Wiki. I doubt that you have personally observed many of these things apart from "The Earth looks flat". Yes, we all in the end rely on the observations of others. In the case of both of these "Day, night" sites, they are used so widely by users all over the earth that I honestly think that we would have heard the outcry by now. I will admit that the we probably find only Polar Bears at the North Pole most of the time, so they might not notice! | Take a look at this day/night diagram: Day and Night World Map (http://www.timeanddate.com/scripts/sunmap.php?iso=20160321T1200) UTC time = Monday, 21 March 2016 at 12:00:00 Noon. South Pole local time = Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 1:00:00 AM. From: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html (http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html) |
So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :D
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia while, at the same time, it is night at the northpole?
The question remains ;)So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :D
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia while, at the same time, it is night at the northpole?
I suppose that of these suns have exactly the same sun-spots etc? Seems a bit unlikely.The question remains ;)I have to insist that a 'two sun model' is the ONLY explanation for how you can have daylight in South America and Australia and night in Europe at the same time. We have trillions of suns in the universe, so why is it so strange to imagine 2 suns orbiting our earth? I haven't seen any objection or explanations from other flat earthers.So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :D
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia while, at the same time, it is night at the northpole?
I suppose that of these suns have exactly the same sun-spots etc? Seems a bit unlikely.The question remains ;)I have to insist that a 'two sun model' is the ONLY explanation for how you can have daylight in South America and Australia and night in Europe at the same time. We have trillions of suns in the universe, so why is it so strange to imagine 2 suns orbiting our earth? I haven't seen any objection or explanations from other flat earthers.So... Can I assume that I just debunked the flat earth theory? :D
Is nobody here able to properly explain to me how it is possible on a flat earth to see the sun in South America and Australia while, at the same time, it is night at the northpole?
I know, I have a simpler explanation! The earth is really a globe that rotates! Think this idea might catch on?
I have no other explanations, and it looks like my FET supporters are busy discussing their private megalomaniacal interests. And it's not small things they have on their plate! In their own words they have (quote): 'Found the cure for cancer', 'doing Gods work', redefined pi, concluded that nobody ever climbed high mountains, and much more.. .It is telling that so many threads end with a globe supporter posting something the FE supporters find hard to answer simply stop. Suddenly all goes quiet. I suppose I don't blame them in the case of my posts, I probably put everybody to sleep, but surely that is not the case with all these "graveyarded" threads!
I would even forgive their stupid avatar names if they could just get the discussion back on track. It's almost like they want to put free thinkers in a bad light.