Wait. How did you prove that the Monopole map and model is the correct map and model of the Flat Earth?
Here is the current Flat Earth model: ?Why do you think the earth is flat aand not any other shape?
Here is the Flat Earth annual budget: $0
Feel free to debunk.
Here is the current Flat Earth model: ?Really? What's all that content in your Wiki then?
Here is the Flat Earth annual budget: $0That's the same as Bobby's annual scientific budget but he has spent time and money doing experiments.
but he has spent time and money doing experiments.That's very unlikely. What makes you think he spent time or money, let alone both?
I'll give you I can't positively prove he's spent money since he's never posted a receipt or similar, but to claim he's spent zero time conducting experiments?but he has spent time and money doing experiments.That's very unlikely. What makes you think he spent time or money, let alone both?
Wait. How did you prove that the Monopole map and model is the correct map and model of the Flat Earth?This is the map on the wiki for the sun. It has been proven to the satisfaction the Flat Earth Society and has been included in the required reading.
Here is the current Flat Earth model: ?Why do you think the earth is flat aand not any other shape?
Here is the Flat Earth annual budget: $0
Feel free to debunk.
Here is the current Flat Earth model: ?Really? What's all that content in your Wiki then?
That's the same as Bobby's annual scientific budget but he has spent time and money doing experiments.
All measurements show it is not 3000miles above the earth. Perspective is not involved.Wait. How did you prove that the Monopole map and model is the correct map and model of the Flat Earth?This is the map on the wiki for the sun. It has been proven to the satisfaction the Flat Earth Society and has been included in the required reading.
https://wiki.tfes.org/Sun (https://wiki.tfes.org/Sun)
The point I am making is that YOU are the "Flat Earth Society." YOU are the one who came here with an interest in "Flat Earth." Read the quote in your signature! If you have any complaints about progress, talk to your mirror.
All measurements show it is not 3000miles above the earth. Perspective is not involved.Wait. How did you prove that the Monopole map and model is the correct map and model of the Flat Earth?This is the map on the wiki for the sun. It has been proven to the satisfaction the Flat Earth Society and has been included in the required reading.
https://wiki.tfes.org/Sun (https://wiki.tfes.org/Sun)
Well. He's posted the results of those experiments so unless he is lying he must have spent time doing them.but he has spent time and money doing experiments.That's very unlikely. What makes you think he spent time or money, let alone both?
I'm just playing around right now. Trying to make a plan before I spend time building a leveling rig and making the hikes.
This is just for fun, mainly, so I'm hesitant to go out and spend over $20 on a rectangular glass fish tank just for this. Maybe I can find one at a swap meet or garage sale this weekend for under $10.
It's a square wire frame shelving assembly that provides a converging set of orthogonal perspective lines when viewed through its center.
I attached a water leveling tube to the left sight for leveling pitch (forward/backward tilt) and a guide line between two orthogonal lines to serve as a transverse sight. Line that up so that it and the two (left/right) orthogonals make a straight line, and that's your vanishing line, which either will or won't line up with the horizon (as long as the rig is level, 90° to vertical. That's what the water level in the tubing is for.
Here is the current Flat Earth model: ?Why do you think the earth is flat aand not any other shape?
Here is the Flat Earth annual budget: $0
Feel free to debunk.
It might be some other shape, sure? The book is called Earth Not a Globe, not The Earth is Flat. A Flat Earth is the interpretation of the experiments. The concave earth people also take many of the ENAG experiments to interpret a Concave Earth; although in Experiment 2 a Flat Earth is strongly suggested.
Here is the current Flat Earth model: ?Why do you think the earth is flat aand not any other shape?
Here is the Flat Earth annual budget: $0
Feel free to debunk.
It might be some other shape, sure? The book is called Earth Not a Globe, not The Earth is Flat. A Flat Earth is the interpretation of the experiments. The concave earth people also take many of the ENAG experiments to interpret a Concave Earth; although in Experiment 2 a Flat Earth is strongly suggested.
While the title of the book contains "not a Globe", the opening page of the book says this:
"Proving it a plane, without axial or orbital motion"
We find other flatness claims throughout the book:
Page 13: "On the contrary, this simple experiment is allsufficient to prove that the surface of the water is parallel to the line-of-sight, and is therefore horizontal, and that the Earth cannot be other than A PLANE !"
Page 20: "...is not a globe, has really no degree of sphericity; but is 'to all intents and purposes' A PLANE !"
Page 23: "When it is seen that the Earth is not a sphere, but a plane, having only one centre, the north; and that the south is the vast icy boundary of the world..."
Page 25: "Having advanced direct and special evidence that the surface of the earth is not convex, but, on the contrary, a vast and irregular plane..."
There are many examples, skipping several.
Page 188: "...because the Earth is a Plane..."
Page 215: "...the Earth is a plane, and motionless..."
Page 221: "...But it has been demonstrated that the Earth is a Plane and motionless, and that from a great eminence every part of its surface could be seen at once..."
EnaG makes it very clear. Flat is the only allowed shape.
What part of "a flat earth is the interpretation of the experiments" was not understood?That's unusually rude and insulting. Not used to seeing that from you. The book is all about the flat earth interpretation of the experiments. It's not a book about "not a globe" leaving the reader to reach his or her own conclusion. Readers are free to do that, of course, but be honest: that's not the objective of the book nor the interpretation by Rowbotham.
Others do take Rowbotham's experiments of seeing further than should be possible and interpret them differently. Rowbotham's work also spawned the concave earth movement.Experiments and observational tests showing one can see further than should be possible can also be interpreted as a larger globe than one with a diameter of 3959 miles. Being able to see further than what should be possible on a no-atmosphere globe of said radius isn't enough to interpret as "not a globe." Globe is not pass/fail on the basis of an earth curve calculator.
If it's not the correct one, which FE map/model should be used as the correct one?
I'm not a FE'er, so that burden of proof is not on me. I research the flat earth FE'ers are showing me.
But I will be delighted if someone can show me a map of FE that explains the Allauch sunset as well as a winter sunset in California:
If it's not the correct one, which FE map/model should be used as the correct one?
Personally I can best relate best to the infinite repeating plane flat earth model. It can corroborate known sun positions, travel times, shipping times, modern cartography etc.
Here's a rough draft of the infinite repeating plane concept:
http://earth3dmap.com/ (http://earth3dmap.com/)
Here is a rough draft of an infinite repeating plane flat earth map which can explain past, present, and future sunrises and sunsets all over the world.
http://suncalc.net/ (http://suncalc.net/)