Hello,
I would like to appeal a warning I got that I worry I may have gotten in error.
The post that triggered a warning for spam is as follows:
Okee, that's 2 of the wells sorted. And the third?
Electromagnetic acceleration - another thing that Neil failed to account for, or, more likely, is entirely unaware of.
Mysfit, could you please stay on topic? You can ask questions about FE subjects you don't understand in the appropriate forum.
It is not off-topic, we are discussing the video, which has 3 wells in the Eratosthenes (ty autocorrect) argument at the 4min mark.
I am not arguing theory, I am arguing that Neil was not 'schooled' by the FAQ or Washington Post, which is the topic.
The link you gave was not the FAQ or an excerpt of the Washington Post, therefore off-topic, but i ignored it's invalidity for sake of argument. I read it all too, because i'm nice.
The topic was discussing a video about flat theory, with Neil de grasse tyson (probly spelled that wrong) going over some simple, and ancient, ways that the earth was shown to be round. A Washington post article poked holes in this video with reliance on the FAQ.
I had queried a part of the video which was ignored by the article, and was provided a link to elsewhere on the wiki. The rest is history.
I am still unsure I was off-topic, but now know that I need to appeal that decision before continuing. I did not see this on the rules and am worried this’ll make more forum fuss
.
I worry I have rubbed Pete the wrong way, which has led to this. I am also labelled as disingenuous, so cannot apologise in a way that’d work. Also not sure where it started, which would be crucial to that apology.
Long story short: I would like to appeal the warning as I feel I was on topic.
Hope whoever has to bother with this is having a nice day and sorry for the inconvenience.