1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: What Religion are you?
« on: December 04, 2013, 01:20:35 AM »NB: replace "Muslim" with "Bomb".Not all Muslims bomb America and other countries.
Q.What do you call a Muslim with a gun?
A.Moderate.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
NB: replace "Muslim" with "Bomb".Not all Muslims bomb America and other countries.
I understand this may be nit-picky, but "Atheist" isn't a religion. It's the lack of a religion, if anything.
A religion is a set of beliefs about reality. You don't have to believe in God to be religious. I think atheism entails a particular set of beliefs about reality and it therefore can be defined as a religion.
Religions have holy texts, and a system of belief. Atheism has none of that, it's just the lack of belief in a God.
The God Delusion and the belief that gods are the product of man's imagination.
Atheism still isn't a religion though.
There are atheists that have never heard of (or are incapable of reading) The God Delusion.
Is this the whole "even babies are atheists" schtick again? Because if it is, you are an idiot.
Babies aren't the only ones incapable of reading.
I understand this may be nit-picky, but "Atheist" isn't a religion. It's the lack of a religion, if anything.
A religion is a set of beliefs about reality. You don't have to believe in God to be religious. I think atheism entails a particular set of beliefs about reality and it therefore can be defined as a religion.
Religions have holy texts, and a system of belief. Atheism has none of that, it's just the lack of belief in a God.
The God Delusion and the belief that gods are the product of man's imagination.
Atheism still isn't a religion though.
There are atheists that have never heard of (or are incapable of reading) The God Delusion.
Well I was referring to your inferring of a soul from our inability to determine an action's cognitive origin.Quote
In that case I suggest you look up dualism interactionism. This is a scientific theory on the soul which has much scientific evidence for it.
There is scientific proof that they do exist and influence what we do. Brain scans from people asked to perform a task do not show a change in their brain activity when they do the task, such a registration of how far they would have to move their body to perform such a task. But obviously we do register such things. This suggests the existence of an immaterial thing that registers the details of a task and then uses our nervous system to perform it.
Also, this sounds an awful lot like a "God of the Gaps" argument.
I understand this may be nit-picky, but "Atheist" isn't a religion. It's the lack of a religion, if anything.
You're a gullible one, eh? Anyway, I said "scientific proof" not "whatever you can pull out of your ass."
There is scientific proof that they do exist and influence what we do. Brain scans from people asked to perform a task do not show a change in their brain activity when they do the task, such a registration of how far they would have to move their body to perform such a task. But obviously we do register such things. This suggests the existence of an immaterial thing that registers the details of a task and then uses our nervous system to perform it.
I urge you to show me this proof.
The necessity of His own maximally great nature.
Oh, I see, when asked direct questions you make shit up.
No, I am making a logical inference about God's nature from the modal ontological argument for God's existence. Look up Alvin Plantinga if you want to understand how that translates to my thinking about God.It is greater to exist in an abstract sense than to not exist at all.
Simply having the idea of something existing doesn't correlate to it actually existing. I can imagine myself with the ability to shoot fire from my hands, but I don't actually have that ability, nor does any form of my persona exist anywhere in reality that has that ability.
Well obviously you couldn't think that and have it happen, but a soul can produce effects upon the body of the universe if it is contingent upon an abstract realm of it. Wiki mind-body dualism.
Souls don't exist.
The necessity of His own maximally great nature.
Oh, I see, when asked direct questions you make shit up.
No, I am making a logical inference about God's nature from the modal ontological argument for God's existence. Look up Alvin Plantinga if you want to understand how that translates to my thinking about God.It is greater to exist in an abstract sense than to not exist at all.
Simply having the idea of something existing doesn't correlate to it actually existing. I can imagine myself with the ability to shoot fire from my hands, but I don't actually have that ability, nor does any form of my persona exist anywhere in reality that has that ability.
What caused God?
I find it laughable that any educated person could believe in atheism in the 21st century. "Nothing came from nothing which exploded and randomly created self-replicating things that somehow created intelligent life, guys!"I find it laughable that any educated person could be religious in the 21st century. "Nothing came from a giant can of beans which circles around Mars and is also invisible, but then that nothing exploded and created Barack Obama, guys!"