Other than "unconstructive" not being a real word
Unrelevant.
Plus, the fact remains that it is more prevalent. Since the creation of the internet, would you say the internet is used more for memes and detrimental political jabs, or more for thoughtful political commentary? If you honestly believe the latter is the current state of affairs, then I should remind you that Reddit doesn't count as "thoughtful political commentary".
Reddit shouldn't count at all, given what we're discussing - popular, mainstream political commentary, the kind that apparently makes conservatives feel like their ideas are under attack.
How was I wrong? You didn't name another mainstream news organization anywhere near the size MSNBC, CNN, or NPR. Fox quite literally has a monopoly on conservative television.
If you specifically meant television, you should have said so. And the only news channel I'd really consider to be a liberal "equivalent" to Fox would be MSNBC. The other ones you listed probably skew more left than right, but any bias they show is trivial compared to how open and explicit Fox (and MSNBC too, to be fair) is about their preference.
Eight enormously popular conservative shows versus thousands of mildly popular liberal shows. Again, that's my point. Liberals in America don't have to resort to a few people talking when they have entire stations ala NPR to broadcast views that agree with them.
No, this was not your point. You clearly had no idea that there were so many successful conservative talk radio shows beyond Limbaugh, and now you're trying to argue that they're overwhelmed by the sheer number of tiny liberal shows, a claim that you obviously just pulled out of your ass in an effort to avoid losing face. You've turned to bad faith arguments to help you win a stupid debate that never would have come up if you had taken the time to research things outside of your frame of reference, like newspapers, radio, and the 1990s.