Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - disputeone

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 9  Next >
21
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 11:48:26 PM »
I do find it a bit concerning the democrats ran solely on "F*ck Trump and F*ck white people" and still won the house.
Please find me this political ad, paid for by a Democratic candidate, that said "Fuck Trump and Fuck white people". Thanks.

The Roy Moore ad that showed a white guy running over brown children. They didn't use the specific words but the message was overwhelmingly clear. White people are monsters that will run over your children in their cars.

If you understand the democratic platform could you please explain it to me?

22
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 11:37:33 PM »
Dave since when are Indians Africans? (Never, they arent.) Indians are Caucasians.

I know Islam is a religion. I stated what would be the most common race and religion in America in 100 years according to UN population estimates.

I intend to respond properly when I have time.

Edit. Calling me a racist doesn't debunk the facts and history I have presented here.

23
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 03:01:17 PM »
Ugh. What passes for a platform for some people is so terrible.

Regardless of the quality of the Republicans platform it was more coherant and positive than the Democrats plarform, I'm still not sure what it was beyond this.

it's not okay to be white, and the genocide of white people will soon begin.

I'm feeling a little sad at the moment, feel free to rub it in, it's a joke now but as you can see from my last posts it wont always be a joke.

Holy shit, disputeone, just say "fuck." You're not sparing anyone's feelings by writing it as "f*ck."

It's not about feelings it's about courtesy, this section of the forum is open to users without accounts and I opted not to swear.




24
This is a very interesting thread, I should have paid it more attention. Tom do you have any information on the people who are pushing for the fraud? I'll do some digging myself. You can usually follow the money in cases like this.

Rushy you make a very good point on how statistics can be misrepresented.

The unfortunate thing about statistics is that you can build any number of false claims on top of perfectly valid data as long as you present your data in a specific order. I'm surprised the rate isn't far higher. I myself have been asked before to present certain data sets in a way which makes them appear more positive than they really are. I've also been asked to emphasize correlations of questionable quality merely to show the hypothesis as more solid than it otherwise would be. No one has ever asked me to outright falsify data, though.

The problem with these inquiries is that normally they can't be denied on a factual basis. Many times, you're not actually committing fraud, that is, you're not saying something that's patently untrue. Presenting the truth in a specific order isn't illegal, and if it was, then all media organizations would go under in a matter of hours. In the end, statistics, particularly statistical models, are dubious science at best. It's never a good idea to lay too much faith on statistical models, especially ones presented by people with a direct interest in saying a specific idea. The underlying facts are often correct while the conclusions are nothing but sometimes educated and usually heavily biased opinion.

This is what I think really goes on, it's much easier and more effective to just present the parts of the truth that support your argument than to lie. I think more people should read about propaganda and how it effects group psychology. It can arguably be used for good or evil but it's power and effect are undeniable.

25
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: On the notion of trolling
« on: November 07, 2018, 11:03:57 AM »
Also, I have no time for videos.
Yeah, what would be the point of using the fastest learning mechanism known to man? A medium that can condense War & Peace down to 3hrs 28mins by conveying information both visually and through audio at the same time. 

Would you prefer my sources in semaphore, morse code or smoke signals in future?

I mean, Dave is wrong about nearly everything related to social/political topics, but I agree with him here. Videos are awful.


If I'm wrong about all that then I may as well just quit cause clearly I'm wrong about everything these days.

Don't quit, I like you, you bring some diversity of opinion to the site. You remind me of another user on the other site I once had good discussions with.

He was a Master and not a Lord however.

26
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 10:47:25 AM »
Also if anyone can tell me what platform the Democrats actually ran on I would appreciate it, the Republicans platform was very clear to me. Focus on the American people, focus on the American economy, focus on the American working class and manufacturing jobs.

I understood the Democrats platform, beyond "f*ck Trump and f*ck white people" to be "No borders, no wall, no U.S.A at all."

I haven't posted that much here but you will find that I am open minded and will always admit when I am wrong. I'd really like to know what the 2018/19 Democratic parties policy is apart from the racism and sexism that has become the left.

I always identified as centre left until they changed their platform from "restrain capitalism" to "f*ck white people." Then changed their voter base from the working class to the elite. (check it out, these midterms, as income increases, the likelyhood to vote Democrat increases, why? Aren't they a party for the embattled American worker?)

27
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 10:27:42 AM »
1. Trump ran on "Republican America First" which is not the same.  He literally calls half of America the enemy.  How is that helpful to America?
Source please.

I remember he called the media the enemy of the people which I totally support, see Operation Mockingbird and the documentary titled "Weapons of mass deception."

2. No one ran on a platform of genocide.  Stop being a snowflake.
You are incorrect, the Democrats have done nothing to distance themselves from the racism of the media supporting them. "We have to do something about white people."

If the Democrats had just publicly disavowed the overt racism and sexism in the media I wouldn't be nearly as upset.

3. Wanna talk about the African nation's that were colonized and controlled by a European minority for centuries as an example of America's future?  Guess you think Blacks and Indians are in charge, eh?
As it stands, Global population estimates from the UN put Africans as a massive global majority in the next century, couple this with the ruling class' hatred of white people and the media blaming every problem in the black community on white people and you've got a very scary situation indeed.

I can only comment on the history of majority African nations that have gained independence, if you have a good example of one please cite it. In the next one hundred years America will be majority African and majority Muslim. The attitude of the people in charge at the moment seems to be removing power as quickly as possible from Europeans in European countries.

Can you cite an example of a nation in which this has gone well?
Quote
When Jamaica gained independence in 1962, the murder rate was 3.9 per 100,000 inhabitants, one of the lowest in the world.[4] In 2005, Jamaica had 1,674 murders for a murder rate of 58 per 100,000 people.[5] That year, Jamaica had the highest murder rate in the world.[2]

I'm not denying I'm salty, feel free to put me in whatever compilation you desire.

Edit bbcode.

28
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 08:14:42 AM »


It's really like the Israelis say, demographics are our destiny. They really are smarter than the goyim, Henry Ford wrote about it a lot. It's one thing to point the finger and say that the media has made our race and people suicidal (check the stats) but we succumbed to the brainwashing, we were weak enough for them to subvert our instinct of self preservation. These are problems of Europeans that have to be rectified.

Good on you guys, in one hundred years your children will be living in a country like Zimbabwe. Each to their own, if that's what you want then it's not my place to judge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimbabwe

I'm just sad they ran on a policy of genocide and won :(.

29
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 08:05:06 AM »
Okay so the media has called that the Democrats won the house while the Republicans are still ahead. Kind of weird but I guess they are leaning on California.

I'll congratulate you guys if you win. I do find it a bit concerning the democrats ran solely on "F*ck Trump and F*ck white people" and still won the house.

I hope you guys have an actual plan past "F*ck Trump and F*ck white people"


Trump literally ran on America first.

I know. It is the definition of evil to put your own people first. Trump should of ran on Australia first, or some sh*t.

I really hope you guys have a plan after you "f*ck white people."

I hope it doesn't turn into a situation like Rhodesia / Zimbabwe after they "f*cked white people"

Congratulations guys, forgive me for not being stoked that the people who want to "erase white people" won power.

I'm sorry if I sound a little bitter but I honestly believe you guys will kill my children for the colour if their skin, laugh at me all you like but I believe you wll genocide my children and grandchildren, before you say it will never happen, Zimbabwe and South Africa.

Edit.
Censor swear words.

30
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 04:13:06 AM »
Okay so the media has called that the Democrats won the house while the Republicans are still ahead. Kind of weird but I guess they are leaning on California.

I'll congratulate you guys if you win. I do find it a bit concerning the democrats ran solely on "F*ck Trump and F*ck white people" and still won the house.

I hope you guys have an actual plan past "F*ck Trump and F*ck white people"

31
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 03:44:10 AM »
Dems aren't out of the running yet, looks like California is going to decide a little bit, the current numbers still predict a Republican house however.



Democrats have lost the working class vote which says a lot.
It's an interesting race.

32
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 02:24:14 AM »
Pollsters have lost their chutzpah, media will lose theirs next .







Isn't it just?

33
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 01:31:44 AM »
I understand the irony of saying I don't want to call it too early, especially in this thread. However it really does look like Republicans will keep the house.
More seats won, more republicans leading. It would be a massive upset if the dems flipped the house at this point.



Hopefully they take a good long hard look at their policy.

34
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 01:14:35 AM »
This is a good live link if anyone wants one.
https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/house/

35
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 07, 2018, 01:11:42 AM »
If he has been chosen by God we will soon know, no one would be able to deny it.

The race is looking closer than I anticipated, at least for the house, Dems are a few seats ahead but there's a lot more Republicans leading.


36
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 06, 2018, 05:58:32 AM »
King James Bible
Quote
I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

Would anyone like to argue that this prophecy didn't describe the West word for word while we were still a Christian Empire?



Gott mit uns.
Deus Vult.

37
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 06, 2018, 01:10:33 AM »
Yeah maybe. I don’t know really. I just chose him because I know Disputeone and him are brethren.

Lol Boots isn't even on speaking terms with me. I don't mind him, I'm glad hes standing up for what he believes now. I used to feel like he self censored. Don't judge people by your assumptions.

38
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 06, 2018, 01:07:29 AM »
It's funny how replacing the word "White" with "Jewish" changes things. Isn't it?

Why?

Is it context?

Yeah context matters for sure.

I'm done here. Sorry man I just cant, you are just being racist.

Quote
Equality
mass noun The state of being equal, especially in status, rights, or opportunities.
‘an organization aiming to promote racial equality’

39
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 06, 2018, 12:10:39 AM »
It's funny how replacing the word "White" with "Jewish" changes things. Isn't it?

Why?

Is it context?

40
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Republicans take the house and senate.
« on: November 06, 2018, 12:01:05 AM »
What Don Lemon said is not an attack on all white men.

[radicalized] White men are our biggest threat.

Fixed that for you so its actually what he said.

Quote
What Adolf Hitler said is not an attack on all Jewish men.

[Communist] Jewish men are our biggest threat.

>Your brain on marxism.

This statement is idiotic.

If you want your point of view to get any kind of traction, you should probably deal with facts and reality, because the cherry-picking and ad homs are only going to make tribalism in your country worse and you will be as much to blame for that as the far left is.

Addressed here.
The whole quote is a gold standard in hypocrisy actually.

Not what I said in the slightest.  Hitler wasn't criticizing all jews, he was criticizing international capitalist and communist jews. There is a difference, although I don't know what Hitlers demarcation is.  So perhaps instead of spamming shitty quotes and making ad hominem attacks you could try and, you know, say something valuable?

What Hitler said is not an attack on all Jews, as the navy seal purported.  It may or may not be accurate to any degree, and that is the conversation worth having instead of just loling your way to ignorance and closed-mindedness.

Dude you gotta chill.

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 9  Next >