I'll just say one last time that they are accurate enough.
As was Bobby's statement leading up to the end. Towards the end of the thread someone posted a video and link to some maths for how small the horizon would actually dip on a Round Earth for the altitude and Bobby remarked that if he had seen the video he may not have even bothered with the experiment.
Your proofs are not well researched and there is no teardown to verify accuracy. At least Bobby was there and willing to verify the elements of the experiment in honesty; which is commendable.
Hmm, not correct there Tom, I am sure Bobby will correct this, but,
He was referring to a video someone posted showing a mountain in transit with the horizon, and as the top of the further mountain in transit with the horizon was well below the hieght of the observer it was pretty conclusive of the horizon being below the eye line. I noticed you ran away at that point.
I would suggest if you are going to quote someone else, you actually get the context, and quote correctly.........
If you want to see the post, go to page 15 of “the horizon is always at eye level” over on Flat earth debate.
Sorry, dont know how to link it. But i am pretty sure you can find it.......