I do not see anyone complaining about what happened. I do see someone pointing out what clearly happened.
It is so clear that essentially none of the judiciary agrees with you.
I mean, it did happen. And what happened is against the law. Period.
I thought "us," was for law and order?
It being what? It's really obvious you aren't a lawyer and neither am I. From what I have read, the issue of whether or not some State legislatures had their plenary authority violated isn't clear since they often delegate, by statute, the authority to run elections to the executive. If the executive does something that is then distasteful to a portion of the legislature, then that should be addressed, but that should happen in such a way that won't disenfranchise millions of people, but rather before the election. In almost every case, legislatures had ample time to act upon regulations, but they did not until it became clear that their party had lost the election. It's no surprise that the only protest against executive action were in swing states; in some cases the protest was over a law that that very legislature had passed following mid-terms. You even had Texas complaining about regulations in other States that they had employed at home.
Seems more like a whole bunch of butt-hurt from the GOP. But then, partisan butt-hurt over losing elections is par for the course in the US. Culturally, the country just oozes being a sore loser.