1

Flat Earth Community / NASA going to SUN

« on: July 23, 2018, 05:40:20 AM »

Hi guys...

NASA is heading towards SUN... any opinion on the same. Below link gives the details of the launch.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/nasa-parker-solar-probe-car-sized-nasa-parker-solar-probe-will-go-closer-to-sun-than-any-other-man-m-1887818?pfrom=home-lateststories

2

Flat Earth Theory / Universal Acceleration - falling slinky experiment

« on: July 17, 2018, 05:02:51 AM »

How the FErs want to take on the video where UA is debunked.

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Question - image leakage

« on: July 16, 2018, 12:00:32 PM »

why are there little to no 'leaked' images of the flat earth

Every image of the Earth is an image of the Flat Earth, because the Earth is flat.

So we have a agreement from you Pete that 'Every' image is a legitimate image of earth, so would be the camera, the people who captured those images. So do you think they deliberately dint captured the images of THE WALL and what ever is in its way?

4

Flat Earth Theory / Re: The curved horizon seen from an aircraft is due to the shape of the window

« on: July 16, 2018, 11:16:25 AM »

If you are told the horizon is curved, and you expect to see a curved horizon ... you'll see a curved horizon.

https://bigthink.com/Mind-Matters/seeing-things-that-arent-there-thats-just-your-brain-functioning-normally

So Baby T... I guess then you were 'TOLD' that earth is 'FLAT'.. that is why you see earth to be flat, isn't it...
That explains a lot about...

Do you think that the RE conspirators may also have done this to every one on earth, that's why every one believes earth is round, except for few of you FEer who somehow escaped that hypnotism (If I may term it so)??

5

Flat Earth Investigations / Cold welding in Galileo spacecraft’s

« on: June 18, 2018, 12:59:16 PM »

An evidence of cold welding came forward in 1991, when the Galileo spacecraft’s antenna got locked down and it never opened. It was later revealed that the umbrella shaped antenna, which was locked before the spacecraft’s take off got cold welded after the spacecraft left Earth. The metal tools used outside the space station in the vacuum of space are coated or covered with plastic so as to prevent them from sticking together.

Do FE'er dispute this???

6

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Escape Velocity

« on: June 15, 2018, 05:56:02 AM »

Tell us what you think would cause (1) blackout, or (2) injury.

I don't see how you've gone from a static speed of 25020 mph to an acceleration of 11,184.91 metres per second squared.

The G-force calculator at https://rechneronline.de/g-acceleration/ tells us that going from 0 to 25020mph in one hour yields 0.71G. If the craft takes off from the ground, and reaches escape velocity in, say 20 minutes, even that only yields just over 2G on average.

The ISS goes around at 17k mph. If we assume a craft to have reached this orbital speed, and that it then wants to leave Earth orbit at 25k, and it does this in (say) five minutes, then it would be subject to just under 3G.

Just to add to this...on another perspective.

If we go by FE'ers, then everyone on earth would have blacked out very long back. (Universal acceleration)

7

Science & Alternative Science / Neil Armstrong Gave Her A Vial Of Moon Dust. She's Suing So NASA Won't Take It

« on: June 13, 2018, 10:52:02 AM »

What are your thoughts on this article on Lunar dust vial?

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/neil-armstrong-gave-her-a-vial-of-moon-dust-she-says-shes-suing-so-nasa-wont-take-it-1866564?pfrom=home-topstories

8

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: China's 9.5 ton space station, Tiangong-1, will come falling from space.

« on: March 08, 2018, 12:39:02 PM »

So is it another bluff/conspiracy by space agency???

Of course not. It's just another testament to the fact that sustained spaceflight is a myth.

Thank you for sharing and supporting our cause!

I am RE supporter

And this Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011 ... so it was orbiting for 7+ years...

Pete can only define what is 'Sustained' in this context....

9

Flat Earth Investigations / China's 9.5 ton space station, Tiangong-1, will come falling from space.

« on: March 08, 2018, 04:40:26 AM »

China's 9.5 ton space station, Tiangong-1, will come falling from space.
Time window speculated is between March 29 to April 9.

So is it another bluff/conspiracy by space agency??? BTW its not NASA this time

10

Flat Earth Theory / Re: How a Gimbal works in FE?

« on: January 08, 2018, 05:00:19 AM »

Here is how both are different

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-gyroscope-and-a-gimbal.htm

http://wikidiff.com/gimbal/gyroscope

The gimbal allows an object that is mounted on the base to move freely in any direction, so that the object remains in a horizontal position regardless of the angle of the base. This freedom of movement makes the gimbal an essential element in many devices that are used to measure momentum and directional orientation

11

Flat Earth Theory / Re: How a Gimbal works in FE?

« on: January 07, 2018, 08:39:53 AM »

I think you  mean gyroscope, a gimbal is used to hold a gyroscope.

Gravity is not what keeps a gyroscope oriented, the gyroscope's angular momentum is what keeps it aligned.

The earth is round, but you can't prove that by using incorrect assumptions.

No, I am specifically talking about Gimbal...I know what Gyroscope is.

Gimbal in itself remains orientated, try it out with a free falling Gimbal....

12

Flat Earth Theory / How a Gimbal works in FE?

« on: January 05, 2018, 05:49:12 AM »

Hi FEers,

A Gimbal is a device that maintains orientation wrt 3 axis. In RE it maintains that due to 'Gravity'... so a Gimbal on free falling object would maintain orientation (That is, it can point which direction is DOWN even during free fall)

What is the explanation of FEer, how it would maintain orientation in FE while UA cannot act on Gimbal during a free fall.

Below is the link on what Gimbal is...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimbal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimbal#/media/File:Gyroscope_operation.gif

13

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Solar Eclipse

« on: November 23, 2017, 09:45:42 AM »

Ok, so it's definitely a shadow object. An object that casts a shadow. An unknown, never directly observed planet that has never been seen blocking the view of any other object in the sky, including the sun which it orbits. Where is your empirical evidence? Beyond just a shadow.

The shadow is direct evidence that an object was somewhere between the path of the sun and the moon. This is direct evidence of an object in RET or FET.

There are a number of conclusion which follow from this in the Flat Earth model; such as since, during the eclipse, there are no visible celestial bodies at night on a path to the sun, that celestial body must be on the day side of the earth.

You say it would be visible if transiting the sun. When has this been recorded?

The shadow object is rotating around the sun from the sun's side, at a slightly off tilt plane. We only see a limited range of the sun's underside, and never see the sun from its side, as discussed in my posts on the previous page, and so we should never expect it to transit for us.

Mercury and Venus can be seen in transit with a filter. Post/pre transit, perhaps not. But they are also visible before sunrise and after sunset. Why is this not the case with the shadow object/planet.

Mercury and Venus are traveling along the underside of the sun, not the sun's side.

The order I learned was sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth. Where does the shadow planet orbit, within the orbit of Mercury or between the Earth and Venus. Does it orbit on the same plane as the other inner planets?

We have deduced that the Shadow Object is slightly off tilt with the plane of the sun, but not much is known about its distance from the sun.

Hey Tom can you share diagram with the details you have mentioned... terms like 'Slightly off tilt' seems vague as always in your posts... give us exact numbers... degree-angle, distance-miles !!!

14

Flat Earth Community / Re: Flat Earth rocket launch this weekend

« on: November 22, 2017, 08:01:32 AM »

Seems to be a publicity stunt...

BTW any FEer of this forum part of this event?

15

Flat Earth Theory / Re: An experiment I want every single one of you to explain

« on: November 14, 2017, 08:16:21 AM »

This type of phenomenon is normally explained by you having changed and broadened your perspective lines at higher altitudes to restore the sun, but this particular case is explained by the existence of waves.

Can you elaborate the explanation of 'existence of waves' and what supporting proofs, artifacts you have if you have performed this yourself. Please share we are waiting.

16

Flat Earth Theory / Re: How the screen of smart phone orient when tilted in FE?

« on: October 25, 2017, 11:03:15 AM »

In both FET and RET the smartphones contain accelerometers that measure acceleration and gravity applying to a phone.
The output is then passed to the operating system and then the onscreen app, The apps by default ignore this but a library function can be included to alter the apps layout or functionality.
If you would like more detail I think that android has a java machine between the sensor and the OS.

Will it work when the phone and the person holding it are freely falling (In RET) and earth approaching phone/person (In FET)?

I guess in a free-fall (RET) G force acts on phone(Accerlometer), while in FET phone screen would remain as is, with no change in orientation...

Is this correct???

17

Flat Earth Theory / How the screen of smart phone orient when tilted in FE?

« on: October 25, 2017, 06:20:42 AM »

How the screen of smart phone orient themselves when tilted in FE?

18

Flat Earth Theory / Re: The Moon

« on: October 13, 2017, 08:15:59 AM »

Check out this link about moon being a UFO

http://metro.co.uk/2015/03/16/does-this-weeks-eclipse-prove-the-moon-is-a-giant-alien-spaceship-5106083/

Snippet of the article...

When the moon moves in between Earth and the sun this week, will there be little green men inside, steering it into the right position?

You might think that the answer is a giant, screaming, ‘NO’…  but UFO sites would beg to disagree.

Some fans believe that the sheer coincidence of eclipses happening at all ‘proves’ that the moon is in fact an enormous, hollow spacecraft, piloted by incredibly advanced alien beings.

In a recent YouTube video, Christopher Knight, author of Who Built the Moon says, ‘The same numbers keep popping up. As Isaac Asimov said,  the eclipse is the most extraordinary coincidence. We started to look at the numbers – and they all worked perfectly.

‘The Earth rotates 366 times as it goes round the sun once. So you could say that the Earth’s number is 366. The Earth is 366% times the size of the moon. That struck us as crazy.numbers keep popping up.’
...
...
..
.

19

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Disproof: Clouds lit from below at sunset.

« on: October 12, 2017, 11:50:44 AM »

What abt these images???

20

Flat Earth Theory / Weightlessness in FEer UA and in REer gravity

« on: October 11, 2017, 08:13:23 AM »

How FEer explain feeling of weightlessness in a UAing earth?