Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on December 30, 2013, 04:10:14 AMQuote from: Tausami on December 30, 2013, 01:30:57 AMWelcome to TFES! I'm pleased to see that we're starting to get angry noobs again. First, I encourage you to avoid making assumptions. We all know the saying about what assume does to us. Instead of saying 'You can't explain x', I suggest you instead say 'How do you explain x?'. You might be surprised at how not-insane Flat Earth Theory actually is. Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on December 29, 2013, 09:56:01 PMThings unaccounted for in your theories such as the effects of Lorentz contraction and special relativity (Which is taken into consideration, but used and applied improperly.) lead me to believe that the UA theory is false.I'm not sure where you're trying to go with Special Relativity. You might want to expand on that a bit, but in a different thread. Hijacking threads (which is absolutely what you're doing right now) is frowned upon.Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on December 29, 2013, 09:56:01 PMDirect "zetetic" observations such as the Sun disappearing under the horizon - and the crazy ideas such as moon shrimp - render me to submit to the idea that believing the world is flat is an exercise in lunacy fueled by paranoia and an inability to just trust the data and facts sometimes.Don't worry, the Moon Shramp are an inside joke. Nobody actually believes in them with the possible exception of iwanttobelieve, who appears to be mentally unstable. The cycling of the Sun is clearly explained by FET. I suggest you read the FAQ. There will be a link to it in my signature within the next five minutes.Date Registered: July 21, 2009, 02:44:23 PMNot an angry noob.Beside the point. I suggest reading this for my problem with Lorentz contraction and the UA. http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=60351.0#.UsDxFHlMhnwI'm not talking about the cycle of the Sun.I'm talking about how it clearly dips below the horizon, and does not "fade out due to a perspective effect".I'm also glad that the moon shrimp are a joke. Quote from: jroa on December 30, 2013, 01:44:48 AMth3rm0m3t3r0, I am not sure what you are confused about. If you can tell me what you can not understand, I will try to explain it in more simpler terms. I am here to help. I understand it, it just doesn't fit.Angry noobdom isn't about when you registered. It's a state of mind.Anyway, in response to your other thread all of the other stars, galaxies, etc. are evidently in our frame of reference. Otherwise they'd be somewhere behind us by now.
Quote from: Tausami on December 30, 2013, 01:30:57 AMWelcome to TFES! I'm pleased to see that we're starting to get angry noobs again. First, I encourage you to avoid making assumptions. We all know the saying about what assume does to us. Instead of saying 'You can't explain x', I suggest you instead say 'How do you explain x?'. You might be surprised at how not-insane Flat Earth Theory actually is. Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on December 29, 2013, 09:56:01 PMThings unaccounted for in your theories such as the effects of Lorentz contraction and special relativity (Which is taken into consideration, but used and applied improperly.) lead me to believe that the UA theory is false.I'm not sure where you're trying to go with Special Relativity. You might want to expand on that a bit, but in a different thread. Hijacking threads (which is absolutely what you're doing right now) is frowned upon.Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on December 29, 2013, 09:56:01 PMDirect "zetetic" observations such as the Sun disappearing under the horizon - and the crazy ideas such as moon shrimp - render me to submit to the idea that believing the world is flat is an exercise in lunacy fueled by paranoia and an inability to just trust the data and facts sometimes.Don't worry, the Moon Shramp are an inside joke. Nobody actually believes in them with the possible exception of iwanttobelieve, who appears to be mentally unstable. The cycling of the Sun is clearly explained by FET. I suggest you read the FAQ. There will be a link to it in my signature within the next five minutes.Date Registered: July 21, 2009, 02:44:23 PMNot an angry noob.Beside the point. I suggest reading this for my problem with Lorentz contraction and the UA. http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=60351.0#.UsDxFHlMhnwI'm not talking about the cycle of the Sun.I'm talking about how it clearly dips below the horizon, and does not "fade out due to a perspective effect".I'm also glad that the moon shrimp are a joke. Quote from: jroa on December 30, 2013, 01:44:48 AMth3rm0m3t3r0, I am not sure what you are confused about. If you can tell me what you can not understand, I will try to explain it in more simpler terms. I am here to help. I understand it, it just doesn't fit.
Welcome to TFES! I'm pleased to see that we're starting to get angry noobs again. First, I encourage you to avoid making assumptions. We all know the saying about what assume does to us. Instead of saying 'You can't explain x', I suggest you instead say 'How do you explain x?'. You might be surprised at how not-insane Flat Earth Theory actually is. Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on December 29, 2013, 09:56:01 PMThings unaccounted for in your theories such as the effects of Lorentz contraction and special relativity (Which is taken into consideration, but used and applied improperly.) lead me to believe that the UA theory is false.I'm not sure where you're trying to go with Special Relativity. You might want to expand on that a bit, but in a different thread. Hijacking threads (which is absolutely what you're doing right now) is frowned upon.Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on December 29, 2013, 09:56:01 PMDirect "zetetic" observations such as the Sun disappearing under the horizon - and the crazy ideas such as moon shrimp - render me to submit to the idea that believing the world is flat is an exercise in lunacy fueled by paranoia and an inability to just trust the data and facts sometimes.Don't worry, the Moon Shramp are an inside joke. Nobody actually believes in them with the possible exception of iwanttobelieve, who appears to be mentally unstable. The cycling of the Sun is clearly explained by FET. I suggest you read the FAQ. There will be a link to it in my signature within the next five minutes.
Things unaccounted for in your theories such as the effects of Lorentz contraction and special relativity (Which is taken into consideration, but used and applied improperly.) lead me to believe that the UA theory is false.
Direct "zetetic" observations such as the Sun disappearing under the horizon - and the crazy ideas such as moon shrimp - render me to submit to the idea that believing the world is flat is an exercise in lunacy fueled by paranoia and an inability to just trust the data and facts sometimes.
th3rm0m3t3r0, I am not sure what you are confused about. If you can tell me what you can not understand, I will try to explain it in more simpler terms. I am here to help.
th3rm0m3t3r0, the joke is on you, then, if you can not even see how it fits.
It looks flat. I have not had my eyeballs calibrated lately, though.
lol, you guys are nuts. Everytime someone shows you evidence that the earth is round, you come up with excuses. This is the crazy asylum.
Quote from: BillyBob on January 17, 2014, 01:04:49 AMlol, you guys are nuts. Everytime someone shows you evidence that the earth is round, you come up with excuses. This is the crazy asylum. Show us your teeth.
The moon reflects light from the sun. How can this happen? Because the earth is round and so is the sun and moon. If you don't believe me, go back to school and actually learn something this time.
Of course there is evidence. Just pick up a science book every now and then. Viola, evidence of the shape of the earth and sun and moon.