1

Flat Earth Community / Re: How do we know the Earth is spherical?

« on: February 02, 2016, 02:18:32 PM »

Wow look how the clouds don't move at all, and these were taken over how many days? That's AMAZING truly

You need to look more carefully. The clouds move. The pictures were taken over less than 4 hours.

I still don't see any movement. I would like to see the date of those photographs and then correspond to the wind forecasted on that day. Allthough even then the wind is measured at ground level but still it would be interesting.

This video shows cloud movement over just two hours
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Without going into too much detail because of obvious reasons, there's a bit of a difference in the distance of your recording and the recording in question. Just a tad.

  True. But i'd still like to know if there's a way to calculate the wind speed at cloud level for the 4 hours that those pictures were taken. Because to my eyes they don't seem to move.

2

Flat Earth Community / Re: How do we know the Earth is spherical?

« on: February 02, 2016, 02:14:40 PM »

The clouds do move, your eyes just refuse to believe it.

Bookish Neptune will not do as he promised. Because he doesnt want to! clear and simple.

He asked for pictures, we showed him, he told us those werent pictures, that they are fake....  We explained to him what composite pictures were. He started complaining about what why there was no moon, we showed him the moon. Apparently the clouds don't move. so it must be CGI....... 

Even if you fly him up to the ISS and point him to a window with a view of the planet, he will probably say its a projection or CGI or something like that.

Why would I refuse to believe it? I don't believe in a flat earth. I'm just saying honestly, I couldn't see any movement from the clouds, just the earth spinning with the clouds not moving independently.

3

Flat Earth Community / Re: How do we know the Earth is spherical?

« on: February 02, 2016, 11:28:54 AM »

Wow look how the clouds don't move at all, and these were taken over how many days? That's AMAZING truly

You need to look more carefully. The clouds move. The pictures were taken over less than 4 hours.

I still don't see any movement. I would like to see the date of those photographs and then correspond to the wind forecasted on that day. Allthough even then the wind is measured at ground level but still it would be interesting.

This video shows cloud movement over just two hours
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

4

Flat Earth Community / Re: How do we know the Earth is spherical?

« on: February 02, 2016, 10:50:09 AM »

The Epic camera on the Discover satellite takes a full frame picture of the entire Earth every 2 hours. http://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/

But since nobody on FES believe any picture of the Earth from space is real, I doubt it will convince you.

This was released by NASA Aug 2015. The images are said to have been taken July 2015.



Now go to the link you provided and click through each and every date from July 2015 to now.

http://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov

Where is the moon in ALL the other supposed photos. I have not found one yet!!!!

Every image looks just like this:



Where is the moon in any image provided?

If you cannot find an image on that website with the moon in it I'd say that is very damaging evidence that it is a complete fraud.

Wow look how the clouds don't move at all, and these were taken over how many days? That's AMAZING truly

5

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Rotations of the stars?

« on: February 01, 2016, 11:46:42 PM »

Hmm maybe the sky just one huge planetarium 

6

Flat Earth Theory / Flat earth debate - Stefan Molyneux

« on: February 01, 2016, 11:21:03 PM »

Hi, Not sure if this has been viewed on here before but it's interesting to watch and a fair and rational discussion between 2 people arguing there 2 seperate beliefs in a respectful and friendly way (for once)  . Unfortunately the young lad "Stephen" isn't the best advocate of the FE theory. Personally I'm undecided but I could play devil's advocate and argue for the FE theory better than this poor boy.



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

7

Flat Earth Theory / Re: New to flat Earth theory

« on: February 01, 2016, 10:27:46 PM »

A reply to Dr. David Thork:
So what's the problem with composite images? I've already clearly stated, that composite images can be used to form a much larger image simply by combining the images. I don't really see a problem with NASA stating the images are composite.

Because the instant you start stitching them together, you can stitch them into any shape you like. A ball or a disc. It is no proof that earth is a ball. So I can disregard all composites, that is an admission the photoshop guys have been creating an image based on an ideal.

The problem is Nasa are suppose to be working toward a scientific understanding. If I want to see drawn images i'll look at some art thanks.