No it contradicts UA. If the earth was accelerating it wouldn’t be consistent.
I am just going to start typing "why?" every time you say this. It's going to save me some RSI.
You may understand how it works but you don’t understand the significance of the results
It is very difficult to understand when you don't explain yourself.
Yet again you are making this claim with zero justification. How many times do I need to ask why?
And yet again I have to explain because that is how relative velocities work. Logic doesn’t need to be justified. If the proper velocities of moving objects change, then so do their relative velocities. That’s either a valid conclusion or it’s not. Perhaps you can explain why you think it is not a valid conclusion.
No, that's a diversion because that is not our point of contention. The point of contention is whether this scenario is applicable to the muon experiment.
Why don't we try this instead. Please identify, specifically, the two objects that you claim change relative velocity over the course of, say, a week, as it applies to the muon experiment.
No assumptions necessary because the velocity of muons has been directly measured and it is consistently measured at .98c.
I agree. Indeed, this is my entire position.
If the earth were accelerating that wouldn’t be the case.
Why do you think otherwise?
Because we observe otherwise. My conclusion is based directly on scientific observations, while yours is based on something that you are refusing to state for some reason.