Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jacques007

Pages: [1]
1
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What do you think about this map?
« on: January 24, 2023, 07:51:10 AM »
I think the map is definitely interesting. As to whether it has validity, I would first have to be convinced of FE Theory, and then of a particular map. I could be convinced if I saw scientific evidence favouring FE Theory. My mind is definitely open to the idea that FE might be true, but I have to see evidence first.

2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 03, 2018, 07:15:50 PM »
Why is a "loss of identity" through races willingly mixing a bad thing? We don't need to preserve everything.
Race mixing and miscegenation are bad because they result in genocide for the White race.

Why must the white race be preserved?

Quote
A Negro marries White. They have a baby. That baby almost always looks and acts more Negro than White. Count one for the Negro, 0 for the White race.

This sounds like something you have made up.

Quote
Notice that on a list of national IQs, the nations WITH THE LOWEST IQS are all in Black Africa and Haiti. The highest are East Asian countries (racially homogenous, I might add), and Scandinavia, also racially homogenous, except for pockets of "bad blood" where African and Middle Eastern immigrants live that bring the overall national IQ down a few points.

IQ is not solely a product of genetics, and IQ is not the sole measure of a human being.

Quote
These are cold, hard, brutal facts. I do not want to be considered uncharitable or unfriendly for bringing up the truth, but let us be honest with ourselves. Race mixing and miscegenation are an evil that must be eradicated, for the preservation of the White race.

So your case is that you think lower IQ in some is terrible and that White people are special?
Before I respond, I shall wait for the Censor to move this coversation to its appropriate location. I do NOT care to be banned.

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 03, 2018, 06:58:49 PM »
It is not too late.
Manipulating human genetic attributes is the responsible thing to do.
A worldwide breeding program must be implemented immediately to preserve the white peoplewhile simultaneously selectively managing the genetics of lesser peoples in order to maintain the natural order of things.
No. I disagree. Other races are NOT inferior. Each race has its strengths and weaknesses. The African race has the lower IQ because they are basically children. They lack the 4% of Neanderthal DNA, that ALL of the other races have, which contributed to the amazing achievements of those cultures.

Non-African, non-White races are equal to the White race, and should be allowed to pursue their destinies in peace. Even the Jews should be honoured for their brilliance, and should be allowed to pursue their destiny in peace. But they should NOT be permitted to own our money supply, or influence our race.

Negroes are a whole different problem. They ARE inferior. They should NOT be mistreated in any way. But they should be guided by the White race to serve, and should be trained. We should treat them the way a father treats his children, with love and care, and should raise them up to serve in our society. Africa below the Sahara should be recolonised by the British and the French, and the Negroes living there should be taught to serve. They are the waiters, the butlers, the shoe-shiners, the workers in Plato's Republic. They cannot be trusted with anything else. But they should still be treated with dignity.

You are deviating from your own OP at this point. If you want to rant about your superiority complex, keep it in CN/AR.
Would you do me the service of moving this entire discussion to the appropriate board? That would help considerably.

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 03, 2018, 05:59:16 PM »
It is not too late.
Manipulating human genetic attributes is the responsible thing to do.
A worldwide breeding program must be implemented immediately to preserve the white peoplewhile simultaneously selectively managing the genetics of lesser peoples in order to maintain the natural order of things.
No. I disagree. Other races are NOT inferior. Each race has its strengths and weaknesses. The African race has the lower IQ because they are basically children. They lack the 4% of Neanderthal DNA, that ALL of the other races have, which contributed to the amazing achievements of those cultures.

Non-African, non-White races are equal to the White race, and should be allowed to pursue their destinies in peace. Even the Jews should be honoured for their brilliance, and should be allowed to pursue their destiny in peace. But they should NOT be permitted to own our money supply, or influence our race.

Negroes are a whole different problem. They ARE inferior. They should NOT be mistreated in any way. But they should be guided by the White race to serve, and should be trained. We should treat them the way a father treats his children, with love and care, and should raise them up to serve in our society. Africa below the Sahara should be recolonised by the British and the French, and the Negroes living there should be taught to serve. They are the waiters, the butlers, the shoe-shiners, the workers in Plato's Republic. They cannot be trusted with anything else. But they should still be treated with dignity.

5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 03, 2018, 10:09:52 AM »
Why is a "loss of identity" through races willingly mixing a bad thing? We don't need to preserve everything.
Race mixing and miscegenation are bad because they result in genocide for the White race. A Negro marries White. They have a baby. That baby almost always looks and acts more Negro than White. Count one for the Negro, 0 for the White race.

Notice that on a list of national IQs, the nations WITH THE LOWEST IQS are all in Black Africa and Haiti. The highest are East Asian countries (racially homogenous, I might add), and Scandinavia, also racially homogenous, except for pockets of "bad blood" where African and Middle Eastern immigrants live that bring the overall national IQ down a few points.

These are cold, hard, brutal facts. I do not want to be considered uncharitable or unfriendly for bringing up the truth, but let us be honest with ourselves. Race mixing and miscegenation are an evil that must be eradicated, for the preservation of the White race.

6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 02, 2018, 01:27:21 PM »
Ethnocentric relations can only serve corporatism by leaving gaps for them to fill in society by managing relations between ethnicities. Corporations are unabashedly global and have more agility in their dealings than countries and can always find a way to push their profit-driven agenda. This is a bigger enemy than muladoTM children.
With respect, I disagree. Destruction of our White race is our most dangerous threat.

7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 02, 2018, 09:41:03 AM »
Here check this out. They don't like us much at all. Apparently Tucker Carlson gave it some air time, which is pretty cool.


I think that's inciting violence and calling for genocide is sort of beyond "free speech" but meh.

What can you do.

Imagine if a European said that about Jews? It would be a much different situation indeed.
Yes, I am inclined to agree. I am not quite sure how to deal with it. I actually somewhat respect Orthodox, Traditional Jews for being proud of who they are. It is the liberal Jew for whom I have no time or patience. I personally think the Orthodox Jew should be sent to Israel. He does NOT own the money in your pocket. And Israel should continue to receive US support. The kind of Jew like the above should be stepped on and crushed. And the White race should absolutely stop mixing with others. My wife is about 48% German, 48% Norwegian, and 4% French. She looks like a German Goddess, and that is exactly how it should be. Blonde, blue-eyed women with creamy white skin advancing the cause of our noble race.

8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 01, 2018, 08:47:53 AM »
Ubermensch is a german word which means over man, maybe translates better to above human. It was merely his germanic pride coming through.
I would disagree with that. He actually was NOT anti-Semitic.

Every day, the level of brainwashing I see surprises me. I hope one day I will no longer be surprised by it.

In our modern-day left-wing environment, which encourages the development of all that is worst in humanity, it is unpopular to say so.

Why would an ideology promote self destruction?

Think about it.
I don't have to think about it, really. The White race is the smallest of the races, which was NOT the case 100 years ago. And Jews own the money supply. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation owned by Jewish interests. They own the money in your pocket. They encourage the mixing of the White race with other races, but won't mix themselves. Nietzsche himself was not anti-Semitic, but perhaps he should have been, at least to the extent of saving the White race. Perhaps we ALL should be.

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: October 01, 2018, 02:44:10 AM »
Ubermensch is a german word which means over man, maybe translates better to above human. It was merely his germanic pride coming through.
I would disagree with that. He actually was NOT anti-Semitic, for example, and on a few occasions indicated that he was descended fom Polish noblemen, and that the best things in Germany were in fact Polish. It was his sister, who was in charge of his estate after his death, who directed the interpretation of his ideas toward German nationalism.

Quote
I don't think eugenics is as bad as Gene and DNA experimentation. China is doing it (both) because they dont have enough "fellow chinese people" telling them they aren't allowed to.

Through Positive Eugenics, the human race could decrease the number of mental and physical detectives in the population, whilst caring for those that DO exist. In so doing, within a few generations, Superman would be a reality. Stronger, smarter, healthier, more beautiful people would exist.

You know I made this case on another site and was banned for it. I think you have a strong point.
I cannot say that I disagree, although, in our modern-day left-wing environment, which encourages the development of all that is worst in humanity, it is unpopular to say so.

10
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Nietzsche
« on: September 29, 2018, 03:38:34 PM »
Has anyone here read Friedrich Nietzsche? I have a BA in Philosophy, and an MA in History, but I am only now reading Nietzsche.

>the absolute state of modern education

Exactly how did both your BA in Philosophy and MA in History avoid teaching you about one of the single most influential modern philosophers? His influence on German culture and the two world wars alone could fill several books, and yet he didn't even get an honorable mention once in two entire degrees? I think you should ask for your money back.
Easy. I did not study much in the way of Modern Philosophy. I pretty much specialised in the ancients and Scholastics. Of course I studied ABOUT Nietzsche in history, but I did not read him directly. I knew about his ideas. I just never read HIM.

And I did read some modern philosophy. But never him.


11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Nietzsche
« on: September 29, 2018, 12:58:22 PM »
Has anyone here read Friedrich Nietzsche? I have a BA in Philosophy, and an MA in History, but I am only now reading Nietzsche. I am reading "Thus Spake Zarathustra", wherein he introduces his idea of the Übermensch, variously translated as "Over-man", "Beyond-man", "Superman", etc.

I am trying to understand Nietzsche's concept of the Übermensch. I personally get the impression that he is speaking almost of a new sub-species of man. Because he talks about the highest goal of a woman being to produce Supermen, ie, to give birth to them, it sounds like Nietzsche intends his Superman to be more man than men. Almost a Homo sapiens superioris v. the Homo sapiens sapiens.

So what do people think of the idea?  Although he coupled his idea of Übermensch with a rejection of Christianity, a view with which I do not agree (I am a Lutheran Christian), I find the basic idea of the Superman agreeable. Always striving for the best, perhaps even Positive Eugenics (wherein the young, beautiful, and healthy are encouraged to reproduce and have many children, and others, whilst not forbidden to do so, are discouraged from it), strikes me as wise. Those who meet high standards should be encouraged to reproduce, and should be incentivised by the State. The more children, the more help from the State. Those who do NOT meet the standards should not be forbidden to reproduce, but should by no means be incentivised.

Through Positive Eugenics, the human race could decrease the number of mental and physical detectives in the population, whilst caring for those that DO exist. In so doing, within a few generations, Superman would be a reality. Stronger, smarter, healthier, more beautiful people would exist.

Of course, things like smoking and other abusive practices would have to be forbidden to those advancing the race, and maybe to all people. The State would have to play a large role in any Positive Eugenics program. But the development of Übermensch could occur. Thoughts?

12
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the ice wall?
« on: September 28, 2018, 03:42:12 PM »
My mind is blown. Is this whole forum a joke that has gone too far?  ???
I actually understand how your mind is blown. It makes perfect sense. The idea that the Earth is flat is a little unusual to say the least. I of course believe in a round Earth. But I will tell you for certain this forum is real, it is not a joke, and people do believe the Earth is flat. There is also another forum that holds the same belief. I am a member of both. Do not think for one moment that this forum is a joke. They are dead serious about this. I think that is what makes it so interesting. That is why I am a member. The fact that people actually believe this completely blows my mind as well. But, what can you do? It is what it is.

I get that. I just find it so crazy. I googled it as a joke but can't believe how serious they are.
I find it interesting on a sociological level. I am a member of both forums in order to understand the sociological aspect of human interaction. The fact that they believe in a flat Earth does not change the fact that they are people and that they sociologically interact with other people. I find human interaction to be fascinating. And so watching people argue and debate things regardless of what they may be really makes me interested. I simply observe, and put in comments where it appears necessary. I have enjoyed my time on both forums, and other forums as well.

13
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the ice wall?
« on: September 28, 2018, 03:31:09 PM »
My mind is blown. Is this whole forum a joke that has gone too far?  ???
I actually understand how your mind is blown. It makes perfect sense. The idea that the Earth is flat is a little unusual to say the least. I of course believe in a round Earth. But I will tell you for certain this forum is real, it is not a joke, and people do believe the Earth is flat. There is also another forum that holds the same belief. I am a member of both. Do not think for one moment that this forum is a joke. They are dead serious about this. I think that is what makes it so interesting. That is why I am a member. The fact that people actually believe this completely blows my mind as well. But, what can you do? It is what it is.

14
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the ice wall?
« on: September 19, 2018, 07:06:38 PM »
A device which was specifically designed and calibrated to show the earth is round or to weaken a specific flat earth model.

Is it your claim that research facilities are established on Antarctica expressly to use devices that attempt to weaken the flat earth model? I can do that with my mobile phone right here in a far less harsh environment than the south pole.

For example if you believe in a flat earth model in which the distance between Australia and south america is three times longer than the distance between US and China and someone measures those distances and the measuring device they use shows that is not true then the claim is made that the measuring device was calibrated to alter the true distances.

So sailors 100 years ago used navigation devices that were calibrated to alter the true distances?
That is a legitimate question. Captain James Cook discovered both Hawaii and Australia. His ship made it back to England, though I think he died on the way. Was he, in the late 1700's, using devices calibrated to hide the truth of Flat Earth?

15
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the ice wall?
« on: September 19, 2018, 03:43:23 PM »
I have a hard time believing that somebody would not have gotten there by now. I don't care how heavily monitored a place is, some human is crazy enough and logical enough to get past whatever monitors there are and survive to tell the tale. It just seems very hard to believe that no one has made the attempt. And NASA couldn't hide itself if it wanted to. It has a hard time hiding anything in a wet paper bag. I mean look I don't know. The US government can't seem to hide anything. Look at Snowden as a perfect example. I mean look, I don't know. Maybe the Earth is flat. That is why I'm here. But it just seems that if the Earth were flat, somebody would have figured that out definitively by now.

16
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the ice wall?
« on: September 19, 2018, 03:33:25 PM »
I think my only question is why are there so many theories in Flat Earth theory? It seems that there should only be one accepted model. You know, just like there is with round Earth Theory. It seems that the multiplicity of theories is a weakness of Flat Earth theory, because no one can really decide on what they believe. It's always been a question I had. And I am not trying to be insulting here, just curious. Does the ice wall exist or not? And if it does what is beyond it? And if it does can we get above it? Can we climb over it? Can we get around it in some way? And if not, why not?

17
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Flat?
« on: September 18, 2018, 11:01:27 PM »
If the earth is flat, then why are every single one of the 71 space agencies around the world lying?

I had no idea there were 71 space agencies. I thought there were only about 7 or 8 of them perhaps. Very interesting. By the way, I am a round earther.

Quote
And all of the astrophysicists, astronauts, people that work for them in general, the US and the USSR during the Space Race, and every government with planes lying? Surely someone from those agencies would have leaked the truth by now. You're also implying every image from space is fake, and there's a lot.

I have also wondered this myself. Especially between the United States and the USSR during the space race. The USA alone spent billions of dollars on the space race. I am sure the USSR spent a like amount. If in fact the Earth were flat, why did they do it? That seems an awful lot of money to waste. It would have been far better of them to actually discover that the Earth was flat, and tell the entire world that.

18
Flat Earth Community / Books on the Flat Earth.
« on: September 18, 2018, 06:30:29 PM »
I have recently bought some books on Flat Earth Theory. One, which I actually bought a long time ago, and am rereading, was written by a REer, Christine Garwood. The title is "Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea". The rest are all written by FEers. "Terra Firma, The Earth is not a Planet, Proved from Scripture, Reason and Fact" by David Wardlaw Scott. "Flat Earth: Investigations into a Massive 500-Year Heliocentric Lie" by James W. Lee. "Flat Earth Clues: the Sky's the Limit" by Mark Sargent. "Worlds Beyond the Poles" by F. Amadeo Giannini. "Zetetic Astronomy: Earth not a Globe" by Parallax (Samuel Birley Rowbotham). I have read this last already. I must admit, the latter one, I was not impressed by.

But what does everyone think of the others? I shall reread "Zetetic Astronomy", just to see if my mind changes regarding it, to do it full justice. But is anyone familiar enough with the other books to give me their opinions on them? Let me know.

19
Arts & Entertainment / Les Miserables.
« on: November 22, 2017, 07:53:43 AM »
Just curious as to what people think of the above book. I am also new here.

Pages: [1]