Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
A Russian missile cruiser magically exploded all on its own. At least, that's what Russia would prefer you believe instead of it getting hit by a missile.
Auckland - Santiago direct with LATAM:
In regards to compass directions as seen on these flights, it seems that these flights make more sense on a Monopole model.
Max Igan reports that, according to his compass, when traveling between Chile and Australia that after takeoff the plane left Chile traveling towards the North-West and then towards the end of the flight it approached Australia from the South-West, despite his passenger terminal map displaying the RE directions. His experience regarding directions is what should generally occur if the flight were traveling on a Flat Earth Monopole Model.
On an RE the flight should leave Chile from the South West and arrive from the North West:
On a Flat Earth Monopole Model the flight would leave Chile from the North West and approach Australia from the South West:
I don't think the plane is necessarily taking a straight line directly over the US, or always makes straight line paths in FE models, but we can clearly see that the compass directions experienced align more with the Monopole Model.
The excuse for this is "magnetic declination", but is is quite curious that it happens to agree with the Monopole model in both areas.
A map is by definition flat, that doesn't mean it's intended to represent a flat earth.
That relies on the assumption that long-distance trade is a much more recent invention than it really is.
What else, if not the Sun and Moon, could have formed tectonic plates in these places?
I recently learned that there's a huge magnetic void around South America (see https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/when-north-goes-south-is-earths-magnetic-field-flipping?fbclid=IwAR355ZL2_HRrECEMm3-GyYo-cXcGCAZUPnn-V8JGH8Kdb3KxL08u-9LOHZg towards the bottom).
The "South Atlantic Anomaly". Some think that the moon hit the Earth in the early days of formation and left a big chunk beneath the Earth surface which blocks convection currents of Lava which causes a lack of electricity generation and a weak spot in the Earth's magnetic field. Maybe this is why Mexico is named after "Moon".
You also argued that this is analogous to water on the Earth's surface. You know, one of those things which aren't directly subjected to UA. This is where your appalling understanding really shines through. "If UA affects the Sun, then it should act like water on the Earth" as an argument boils down to "something affected by UA should be indistinguishable from something expressly unaffected by it". Or, in terms of propositional logic: true is false.
Quora versus Cornell.
Or it could just be that they did not like speaking to the press.So you begin a rigorous recruitment process from the air force to find the absolute best of the best ... and you pick 3 guys who don't like communicating?
Have another go.
You only have to look at the Apollo 11 conference to see that not one of the team had been to the moon.
It shows that the galaxies are not as envisioned. They don't behave as they should in many different ways. Compared to the conventional belief of Galaxies, they are cartoons. This is not generally publicized, the problems are often ignored or only murmured about, and it takes a lot of research to just dig it out.
Come back in a few years and you will find similar articles on the Sun and Planets too. It is being put together piece by piece. The entire sky is a fantasy cartoon.
The galaxies are cartoons - https://wiki.tfes.org/Problems_of_the_Galaxies
