Indeed - please, let's keep it on-topic.
Well, I finally had a chance to listen to the podcast. It's not as bad as I expected, so fair enough, but it's also not great. And I'm not talking about the fact that they presented our views as "wrong" - I kind of take that part of granted. What's more troublesome to me is that the overarching message of the podcast was "Flat Earthers themselves are not entirely unreasonable or dangerous, but what if their worldview serves as a gateway to other, more dangerous fringe views?"
I'm not sure how to respond to that - some people who question authority end up taking it to an extreme... therefore, we should stop questioning authority? Sounds extremely counter-intuitive to me. It's not an argument that's taken seriously (anymore) when it comes to e.g. marijuana being a "gateway drug", and I'm not sure why this case would be any different.
The journalist who prepared most of the material has been following us on social media for quite a while, and he seems receptive to critique. I'll try to reach out to him in the near future and see if we can find some common ground.