1
Flat Earth Community / I'm calling out Tom Bishop (But in a friendly non-confrontational way)
« on: August 09, 2017, 06:24:26 AM »
Tom, first of all, let me call you brother. My name is Tom as well, and in the ancient Hebrew, the word means "Twin". As a Tom, I feel a kinship with all Toms and want to show you appropriate respect and deference consequentially.
I haven't been on these forums long, but your presence is hard to avoid. You speak passionately in favor of FET, and seem to at least want to engage on a logical level, even if I can't always follow your logic. I'm willing to accept that this is a shortcoming on my part and not yours.
That being said, I notice that you tend to engage your support of FET on a very mathematical level. I respect that, I'm not great at math overall, and I can only acknowledge those who are in the highest regard for doing what I cannot.
I want to see if you're willing to engage on a different, non-math based level.
I have many bones to pick with FET, ranging from the confusing nature of the conspiracy it would take to perpetuate it, to the failure to address why GPS works the way it does without breaking the short-distance success it has for me when I'm trying to get where I want to go.
Before we get into any of that, I'm asking you, Tom Bishop, my brother in name and respected individual with intelligence and conviction, are you willing to engage with me in a slow, calm conversation?
(I would ask others who might wish to jump in on either side to refrain from posting as well. I want this to be as pure as possible between two Toms.)
I haven't been on these forums long, but your presence is hard to avoid. You speak passionately in favor of FET, and seem to at least want to engage on a logical level, even if I can't always follow your logic. I'm willing to accept that this is a shortcoming on my part and not yours.
That being said, I notice that you tend to engage your support of FET on a very mathematical level. I respect that, I'm not great at math overall, and I can only acknowledge those who are in the highest regard for doing what I cannot.
I want to see if you're willing to engage on a different, non-math based level.
I have many bones to pick with FET, ranging from the confusing nature of the conspiracy it would take to perpetuate it, to the failure to address why GPS works the way it does without breaking the short-distance success it has for me when I'm trying to get where I want to go.
Before we get into any of that, I'm asking you, Tom Bishop, my brother in name and respected individual with intelligence and conviction, are you willing to engage with me in a slow, calm conversation?
(I would ask others who might wish to jump in on either side to refrain from posting as well. I want this to be as pure as possible between two Toms.)