Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
This is all explained by my COT hypothesis (Celestial Ocean Theory). I suggest you read up on it here: https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=8294.01.I know what my profile text thingy says, but I will have to break it to be honest to you: The Celestial Ocean Theory is the one of the most idiotic things I have ever read. Curious George could invent a better theory. I also don't get how come Libyan Desert Glass is made out of the same material as Mars and the Moon or how come all planets and moons are made of the same exact material. They aren't, so "The Firmament" is made out of lots of different compounds, each in a certain section that has to fall out together.
Now, to your questions.
1: Gravity does not exist; it is a product of a biased scientific community. Everything in observable physics can be explained through the laws of buoyancy, no gravity needed. The Universe, encased in the Celestial Ocean, accelerates upwards.
2: The planets do exist. Or, well, they do not exist in the same way NASA tells you. In my Celestial Ocean Theory, which I find the most reliable, the planets - as well as meteorites - are simply debris generated by cracks in the Firmament. This debris floats above the Sun and the Moon as the laws of buoyancy dictate.
3: The exact nature of the ice walls are unknown, but according to COT, they are not actually holding the oceans in; they are simply supporting the Firmament. We will probably never get to know the exact nature of the Ice Walls because Antarctica is heavily guarded and it is almost impossible for civilians to be allowed to reach the South Pole (Because it doesn't exist).
4: They have, but the scientific community is littered with frauds and corrupt shills. NASA and other pro-globe organizations force scientists to spread misinformation and to suppress evidence of the Flat Earth.
I honestly think that the FE Society should raise some money to launch a CubeSat into space with hardened electronics, a rudimentary inertial navigation system to roughly detect altitude and location, and a camera of their choosing. You can use hardware security modules and some circuits to detect tampering with a clear chain of custody up to the launch company. It's not ridiculously expensive, and this should settle the debate once and for all.It has been suggested before, but I've never heard of them approving the idea and doing it.
They [airliners] would also have to be constantly climbing to keep from being caught by the earth while it is accelerating at 9.8 m/s.
Here's another scenario I have not seen addressed as yet. The earth accelerates upward. Do all objects associated with the earth, or in the vicinity of the earth, accelerate similarly? The sun, moon and planets which circle above the earth remain in place (save for the curious vertical variations in their orbits required to explain seasons, eclipses, etc.), relative to the earth, causing one to infer that they are under the influence of the same "unknown force".
So here is my question: if the planet rotates in a circular motion, why would people not fly off the edge of the planet or die of the rapid changes in acceleration?We wouldn't, because of gravity. On the flat earth, what happens to the poor people on the bottom of the disk?
I’ll point you in a direction to try to help you, but I’m not going to bother trying to convince you of something since no one so far has shown the capacity to think beyond what they think they already know.Science is not where we think beyond what we already know. It is where we use what we already know to think beyond what we already know! We can't confirm the Flat Earth, as it does not use any current proof or any proof of their own.
scientists around the globe believe the earth is flat.