I want to make sure I'm understanding and characterizing Zetetic thinking and methodology correctly.
Are these statements accurate?
1) I cannot see the curvature of the earth, therefore the earth is flat.
2) I cannot see the end(s) of the flat earth, therefore the earth is infinite.
If these are true, would it also follow that these statements are accurate?
3) I cannot see across the ocean, therefore the ocean is infinite.
4) I cannot see electromagnetic radiation at a wavelength of 1 mm known as infrared, therefore it does not exist.
5) I cannot hear a longitudinal wave vibrating the air at 25kHz, therefore it does not exist.
6) I cannot see my own cells, my DNA, therefore they do not exist.
7) I cannot see atoms, protons, electrons and quarks, therefore they do not exist.
These all empirical first person observations relying on my own senses to discern the true nature of the world around me from which I had derived the simplest most straight forward conclusions. I did not speculate or imbue biases on what the answer might be, before first testing them out.
Please Zetetic council members, help me out here. Do my conclusions make sense in light of Zetetic methodology? Please explain one way or the other. Thank you.