the contention that these voyages were undertaken with incorrect maps.
Do you know of anyone who claims that RE-based projections cannot successfully be used for navigation? I sure ain't one of them (generously assuming they even exist), and your response has nothing to do with my question. Sounds like my original interpretation was correct.
This all seems more like "debate" or "Pure Nonsense". Surely İntikam's material is hardly fit for the
Flat Earth Information Repository - not my problem, still here goes:
First minor point.
As Junker and others have pointed out your earth is round, so you are the
round earthers. We are the
Globe Earthers - I know a lot on both sides mix them up.
Then the rest seems to be based on very strange logic!
All western navigation since maybe the 1700's has been based on
projections of the Globe.
As far as I know, no flat earth maps are ever used for recent navigation, especially for intercontinental routes.
Whether or not the charts based on
projections of the Globe are perfectly accurate, they are all we have.
So until you can show evidence of inaccuracies in any
navigation charts that are related to the earth being a Globe,
we can take it that
navigation charts based on projections of the Globe are accurate.
Of course, there would be a few insurmountable problems with creating
navigation charts based on the Flat Earth map!
No-one knows what the Flat Earth map is!
Most seem to accept the "Ice-wall" map, but
Tom Bishop claims to support the "Bi-Polar map",
JRoweskeptic has his Dual earth "Map", with no details, and who knows what else.
And no-one has any Flat Earth map with anywhere enough detail to even find any city in Australia! And don't show me "Gleason's Map" - that is also a projection of the globe.
It's no wonder few take the idea of a Flat Earth seriously when even Flat Earthers themselves can't decide on the shape of the earth.