If you want to suggest that something is evidence I would suggest not citing someone branded to be a compulsive liar. You can't be a compulsive liar and expect that your evidence is trusted, regardless of subject.
...says the man who hangs on Trump's every word, someone who told more demonstrable lies than any other President in history
But in any case I have seen other star trail photos, I have seen other time lapses. JSS's matches what I'd expect to see. And you know what, your philosophy is apparently to base your views on empirical observations so rather than trying to defame JSS how about you make your own observations if you doubt his results.
It's fairly easy to see that the stars would seem to rotate clockwise when looking North and counter-clockwise when looking South in a FE model
Incorrect. Because there only one centre of rotation which is the Northern hub.
Someone from point A - the North Pole would look up and see the stars going round in a circle above them - which matches observations, so far so good.
Someone at point B, roughly the equator, would see stars going in arcs but all in the same direction. You wouldn't get the arcs going in the shape showed in the photo above.
Someone at point C in, say, Australia, would also see arcs but with a wider radius. There is no other centre of rotation they would see the stars going around.
In the South if you're looking North you would see stars going from East to West and if you're looking South you'd see them going West to East. But they wouldn't be rotating around a Southern point in your model.
There are also situations in which two celestial poles manifest. P-Brane's explanation is one of them, or it is found that when light comes in though a magnifying dome, it creates an opposite point of rotation.
Alternatively, there could be two celestial systems - https://wiki.tfes.org/Bi-Polar_Model
So you're having to make up ad-hoc, unexplained mechanisms to make the observations fit your model?
Not very Occam's Razor, is it?
There is a model which explains all this very neatly of course...