Just quick and dirty.
Left is the image from the website showing what the moon should look like, Right is a crop from :32 sec into the video, I adjusted contrast and brightness to make it easier to see. Looks pretty much spot on.
Yes, we all agreed that the moon appears to be in 95% illumination. The problem is that it should not be in so much illumination.
Your calendar is based on what the moon does do, not what it should do.
Wrong as you perpetually are. It's just as it should be. This whole thread is a straw man attempt to run from another thread. It looks, EXACTLY as it should and as ALL reputable sources say it should, as all math and accurate diagrams say it should. Trying to explain this to you is like trying to explain to a 5 year old that insists the world is moving and not the car why they are wrong. Shrink your "should be" picture to scale, move it where it should be and render a picture in a 3D graphic program. That's 3 1,2,3 dimensions... Savvy? NVM, obviously, no. Forget it, head to the beach, chant "it's flat, it's flat" while rocking back and forth.
I enjoy honing my skills on you, but really, how the hell do you continue to defile yourself defending a "theory" (laughable to even call it that) that can't predict even 1 natural, observable phenomenon? Your attempting to argue a global conspiracy that has miraculously kept the whole world in the dark about the true nature of the Earth but has somehow failed to notice the FUCKING MOON doesn't look right every month? So while we can predict and explain everything anyone can see looking up, with formulas that have been around for 100's-1000's of years. (Including the phases of the moon) somehow they failed to "bullshit" the moon as well?
So really, PUT UP OR STFU! You and your band of simpletons can't produce a map, the distance between any 2 locations, the direction the sun is going to rise or set tomorrow, what time it is in a given location, the phase of the moon, the next solar or lunar eclipse, why either of them occur. You can't scrounge together enough money or interest to pursue even the simplest of research or experiments humans have been performing for the same 1000's of years while riding horses and sail boats!
We have freaking pictures of the planet and you say the are Photoshoped? Really, well how about you all Photoshop us a picture of your world and put everything we see in it? While your at it, animate the moon, planets and stars and let's check it out.
No one avoided this charade as you said we would, it's just stupid. Something everyone see's all the time is "impossible" because you lack the skill to understand, illustrate or convey it? Pathetic...