((sigh... I had up to part 6 and my browser crashed))
So I'm gonna go through 1-10 of your link and see how they measure up against Truth.
1. Nope, Bush Sr. actually signed NAFTA.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/13/trump-wrong-nafta-bill-clintons-creation.htmlHere's a pic even.
NAFTA started with Ronald Regan and Bush Sr. signed the actual agreement in December of 1992. In 1993, Bill Clinton became president and the agreement had to go through Congress, which was put into US law in 1993. Basically Bush Sr. made NAFTA, signed it, and then the US made it law a year later. In a way both are right, but Clinton didn't have much to do with the actual agreement aside from implementing it in the US.
2. Misleading. Here's the full quote:
As part of her handling of the case, Clinton filed an affidavit July 28, 1975, requesting that the girl go through a psychiatric examination. “I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing,” Clinton said. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
As a court appointed lawyer to a rapist, she had to do her best to represent him. It's the law. And she did. It was horrible but she did. Those quotes were from her requesting a psych eval of the 12 year old. Again, part of her job.
3. I can't comment much since I don't work for CNN IT but it IS something that happens. However, if she was cut off due to saying something bad, why would she have been kept on staff AND promoted after the election?
4.
http://www.omaha.com/news/metro/crowd-at-hillary-clinton-s-omaha-rally-exceeded-with-overflow/article_0c8bc1b0-5946-11e6-abf7-6f6f26e598bf.htmlOverflow room. Cause the gym had a maximum capacity. And the article above is from the local paper. Unless you think that's also "fake news".
5. The timestamp of that live show was 3 hours after the gas dropped. CNN reported on it that day at some point.
http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2016/08/02/syria-gas-attack-damon-lok.cnnCheck the date. August 2nd. The same day the gas dropped. So unless Fox news just kept playing the same video on a loop while saying the same thing for hours on end and that's good, this point is full of failure.
6. The title was to illustrate Trump going from courting black voters to talking about felons not being allowed to vote. Blacks are disproportionately convicted of crimes in the US more than any other race. Thus, it's almost hypocritical to try to court the black vote while also attacking the idea of allowing convicted felons who served their time ,which has more blacks proportionally than any other group. Kinda like saying "Republicans should vote for me but welfare is shit and needs to be killed" since more Republicans are on welfare in some states than Democrats.
7. Yeah and several fox news networks picked up the story that CNN posted. And according to this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3734646/Secret-Service-says-didn-t-formally-approach-Trump-Campaign-Second-Amendment-death-threats.htmlThere was no "formal" talks but informal is a possibility. So the CNN report may have been accurate.
8.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/29/cnn-edits-donald-trump-tweet-referencing-crooked-h/Yep, they didn't show it in the TV spot but did on the website then said they should have done it right on the TV.
9. It's not CNN but a sister company owned by CNN. So misleading there.
And yes, they did blur out the re-aired (the live broadcast had it non-blurred) version. They said it was an error but personally, I'm glad they did. No sense in getting political. If he had a Clinton shirt, they should have blurred it too. After all, why would you care about his opinion on political parties if you're telling a story of how he saved a life? Also, he was a jackass for wanting to make a political statement while talking about saving a baby's life. Tell the facts, don't get political!
10. If you read the actual transcript of the show that the guy cuts off, you'll find that Howard Stern didn't say anything but they got the tapes from his show and Trump was on it and he said he was for the war. The tape is what it is. So in a way, Howard Stern confirmed it, but in 2002, not now.
So first ten and they're (at best) misleading (likely unintentionally).
As was said, this isn't some kind of explosive proof, it's more like luke warm coffee.