I'd argue this isn't really in the public interest to charge Andrew. He isn't predating on actual children, and again trafficking suggests someone is taken against their will... and she just looks like every other thirsty Instagram girl to me...
Ahhh... the old "victim blaming" defence. Tsk, tsk.
It's all very well to say that Virginia Giuffre was a willing participant, and it's correct to say that the
age of consent is 16 years, but... in the case of a female, the male partner must be no more than
two years older, IE 18 years of age. At the time of Andrew's sexual penetration of Giuffre he was
23 years older—in fact old enough to be her father! This alone indicates a sexually deviant individual
who took advantage of an uncultured young girl's naivety, and one who had stars in her eyes.
Andrew hasn't been "charged" with any crime, nor will he be. This will be purely a civil court case.