Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Kangaroony

Pages: < Back  1 2 3 [4]
Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the south pole?
« on: November 28, 2021, 02:33:29 PM »
I don't know about Admiral Byrd's Hollow Earth Theory but his statements about other-worldly beings with flying craft is probably a reference to UFO's and their inhabitants.  There's definitely been a connection with atomic energy and UFO activity and the US Gov't is going full forward on Acknowledging these craft exist and trying to determine who's flying them.

I'm not sure what you mean by the term "atomic energy" with reference to alleged UFO "activity".  Links to that connection please.

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Problems with the FE sun
« on: November 21, 2021, 05:26:19 PM »
If the dome did consist of a thick opaque metallic substance, in order to reflect light, would it
not also reflect (or deflect) the radio waves we're allegedly picking up from distant stars? It'd
be like a Faraday cage would it not?

Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the south pole?
« on: November 21, 2021, 05:17:12 PM »
...With all due respect, whatever that story was about PanAm is false. If you watch "Flat Earth Clues" by computer scientist Mark Sargent, it plainly states that since Admiral Byrd, nobody has been allowed to go back to Antartica. Professor Sargent feels this is due to an ice wall, which I respectfully disagree with, preferring an infinite ocean model beyond Antartica, but, either way, it is historical point of fact that Antarctica has been cordoned off since the 1950's.  Any stories you hear to the contrary is social media misinformation designed to inveigle and distract from the simple fact of the matter that the US government has been in panic mode over Antarctica ever since the Byrd expeditions. Professor Sargent believes Admiral Byrd found the ice wall, I think he found more ocean, but either way, what he found does not fit the globetard model, and that is just an empirical fact of the matter.

A few points if I may:

Admiral Richard Byrd  was a bit of a nutter at the time he travelled to the south pole. He
claimed the Earth was actually hollow, with a complete other world inside, including a sun!

He purportedly met with "The Master," the city’s leader, who told him of his concerns about
the surface world, writing:

"Our interest rightly begins just after your Race exploded the first atomic bombs over Hiroshima
and Nagasaki, Japan. It was that alarming time we sent our flying machines, the ‘Flugelrads’ to
your surface world to investigate what your Race had done… You see, we have never interfered
before in your Race’s wars and barbarity. But now we must, for you have learned to tamper with
a certain power that is not for your Man, mainly that of atomic energy. Our emissaries have already
delivered messages to the power of your World, and yet they do not heed

Mark Sargent has no scientific qualifications; none in astrophysics, astronomy, cosmology,
interstellar or heliospheric physics.  Which means he's no more qualified to talk about an
alleged flat earth model than anybody else, and particularly accredited scientists.  This does
not however prevent him from publishing his considered opinions about the FET and which
we should at the very least consider.

It should be noted though that Sargent is a conspiracy theorist; he promotes cryptozoology,
that Bigfoot and the Chupacabra are real, a New World Order exists, and that Freemasons
have a secret agenda.

This is footage of Sargent being brought undone by a couple of simple questions and a little
video.  It's embarrassing to watch him blatantly lying.       It's called denialism.

Additionally, the Antarctic continent has not been "sealed off" since the 1950s.  The
Australian airline QANTAS offers travellers 19 different 12-hour flight routes across Antarctica
in Boeing 787 Dreamliners, with these flights also crossing the southern magnetic pole. 

A round-trip ticket currently costs US$867.

—I had to laugh at the "Professor" Sargent appellation too.      ::)

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Problems with the FE sun
« on: November 21, 2021, 02:23:19 PM »
Thanks MetaTron...

I guess that would work, as I know that even a dense morning fog easily blocks
out the majority of the sun's light.  It's hard to imagine how an optically-dense
dome would be stabilised, and what gasses composed it though.  A normal fog,
composed as it is of simple water vapour easily dissipates as the atmosphere
warms up.

The proposed "dome" would/could not be composed of a solid—like a plastic or
glass—and would have to be nearly opaque.

I also note from your photos that your light source is acting like a spotlight,
whereas the sun radiates light from its entire spherical surface.  Your lamp
has, naturally, a sharp lens/reflector cutoff, so it doesn't accurately mimic the
light from the sun—which has no such artificial cutoff.

I note too that your model of the earth is spherical.  And the second image
appears to show Australia lightly but evenly and equally illuminated from
its west coast to its east coast—which of course cannot happen as the earth

Could you please post a couple of images using the FET model of a flat planet
with a similar lighting source, and with the countries arranged as per that model?

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Problems with the FE sun
« on: November 21, 2021, 03:35:25 AM »
I live in Melbourne, and I can be standing in full sunlight when I phone my friend
in Perth, who confirms it's totally dark there.  The distance from one city to the
other is 1,700 miles.  I don't understand why she can't see even a light glow from
the sun, looking east towards Melbourne. 

According to FET, the sun is 3,000 miles above the earth's surface.  Using simple
trigonometry, this means she's only around 3,500 miles from the sun in Perth.

Why then can she not see it?  How does that extra 500 miles block the sun's light
so completely?

Pages: < Back  1 2 3 [4]