What on earth are you going on about?
You haven't disproved you can't use Saros to predict eclipses accurately. And you won't be able to. There is a regular pattern to them occurring. If you can add, you can work them out.
NASA admit they keep 5000 years worth of data and use that and I provided a horses mouth quote for you.
At no point have I ever seen NASA say, "we monitored all the places the celestial bodies were in and as that as our datum, simulated movement to predict eclipses" because that never happened. There is no arbitrary datum point. The datums come from the historical archives.
Somehow you think RET won this debate? I showed how to predict eclipses without earth needing to be a ball. I showed NASA using it. I showed Columbus using it. I showed that the assumption that RET had a better answer was false, the three body problem is too complicated to run out 1000 years of predictions.
And if you are still in doubt, here is an article telling you WE STILL HAVEN'T SOLVED THE RET THREE BODY PROBLEM, and that we have 1223 ways of trying, none of them work and we end up just observing and using the ruddy tables to confirm which ones turned out right!
For more than 300 years, mathematicians have puzzled over the three-body problem – the question of how three objects orbit one another according to Newton’s laws. Now, there are 1223 new solutions to the conundrum, more than doubling the current number of possibilities.
No single equation can predict how three bodies will move in relation to one another and whether their orbits will repeat or devolve into chaos. Mathematicians must test each specific scenario to see if the objects will stay bound in orbit or be flung away.
The new solutions were found when researchers at Shanghai Jiaotong University in China tested 16 million different orbits using a supercomputer.
You are a liar. You are lying about the declarations of NASA. I have shown you NASA themselves saying they use table data. I've shown the three body problem still extrapolates into chaos even today and they CAN'T predict eclipses way off in the future with RET. This is a massive RET fail, and you are now resorting to lying to brush it under the carpet.