Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2871
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11340 on: May 06, 2024, 05:26:58 PM »
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7723
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11341 on: May 06, 2024, 09:54:43 PM »
So, an illegitimate "special prosecutor" introduces a bald-faced lie to the court:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-says-jack-smith-should-be-arrested-after-documents-revelation-5644083?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn


Wait... OMG! 
Wait...OMG!

You mean Trump is being prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, yet the lead prosecutor's office is allowed to freely mishandle the same documents?
I'm not sure the article you posted would agree.
I'm not sure YOU would agree.  Unless you think putting objects back in teh same box but not the exact same configuration is "mishandling".
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2871
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11342 on: May 07, 2024, 10:04:21 AM »
So, an illegitimate "special prosecutor" introduces a bald-faced lie to the court:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-says-jack-smith-should-be-arrested-after-documents-revelation-5644083?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn


Wait... OMG! 
Wait...OMG!

You mean Trump is being prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, yet the lead prosecutor's office is allowed to freely mishandle the same documents?
I'm not sure the article you posted would agree.
I'm not sure YOU would agree.  Unless you think putting objects back in teh same box but not the exact same configuration is "mishandling".
I am sure you are not sure.

I am sure submitting a false report of the order of contents of a box to a US District Court judge in a trial concerning the mishandling of documents is mishandling documents.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3393
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11343 on: May 07, 2024, 03:04:03 PM »
Who cares? Seriously, how is this a valid legal issue?
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4202
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11344 on: May 07, 2024, 03:53:50 PM »
It's a complete non-issue, just another example of Trump doing anything he can to delay or end the trial.

That he actually seems to think this is something to be taken seriously indicates a severe case of TDS on Action80's part, poor guy.  :(
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7723
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11345 on: May 07, 2024, 04:06:07 PM »
So, an illegitimate "special prosecutor" introduces a bald-faced lie to the court:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-says-jack-smith-should-be-arrested-after-documents-revelation-5644083?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn


Wait... OMG! 
Wait...OMG!

You mean Trump is being prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, yet the lead prosecutor's office is allowed to freely mishandle the same documents?
I'm not sure the article you posted would agree.
I'm not sure YOU would agree.  Unless you think putting objects back in teh same box but not the exact same configuration is "mishandling".
I am sure you are not sure.

I am sure submitting a false report of the order of contents of a box to a US District Court judge in a trial concerning the mishandling of documents is mishandling documents.

Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.

Therefore its not relevant and not mishandling.  And if this is Trump legal defence, he really has none.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2871
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11346 on: May 07, 2024, 07:36:57 PM »
Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.Yes.
FTFY.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7723
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11347 on: May 07, 2024, 08:07:36 PM »
Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.Yes.
FTFY.
Why?
Which of the charges relates to the order or position of the documents inside the box?
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.


*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3393
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11349 on: May 08, 2024, 03:30:53 PM »
Yes, it's almost as if one party in this case is doing everything they can to keep delaying this trial until the election in the hopes of winning the presidency and making all their legal problems go away. I wonder who it could be?
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7723
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11350 on: May 08, 2024, 03:56:42 PM »
Jack Smith is such a total fuck up, the judge cannot even decide when to begin the trial.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-delays-trump-documents-trial-wont-set-new-date-5645658?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn

Two more weeks.

Considering all the hearings are motions from the defence that the judge decided to grant, likely because she's a Trump lover, I disagree that he 'fucked up'.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2024, 05:40:22 PM by Lord Dave »
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

Re: Trump
« Reply #11351 on: May 08, 2024, 05:04:32 PM »
of course the president should be absolutely above the law, that's exactly the idea this country was founded on
I have visited from prestigious research institutions of the highest caliber, to which only our administrator holds with confidence.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7723
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11352 on: May 08, 2024, 05:40:54 PM »
of course the president should be absolutely above the law, that's exactly the idea this country was founded on

Only if they're white men tho.  Women and blacks are excluded.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2871
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11353 on: May 11, 2024, 07:11:45 AM »
Yes, it's almost as if one party in this case is doing everything they can to keep delaying this trial until the election in the hopes of winning the presidency and making all their legal problems go away. I wonder who it could be?
Yes, it's almost as if a bunch of fascists want to decry and eliminate due process within US courts.

I wonder who it could be?

Hint: ^ Look at the author of the post above.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3393
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11354 on: May 14, 2024, 01:19:48 AM »
Again, I still don't understand exactly how wanting someone who has been charged with multiple crimes to have their day in court is wanting to "eliminate due process;" much less how having that same person entirely avoid having their day in court by being elected president and then abusing their office to make their legal problems go away is totally fine.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2871
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11355 on: May 15, 2024, 02:41:25 AM »
Wow, you want the "day in court," based on this.

« Last Edit: May 15, 2024, 04:08:49 AM by Action80 »
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7723
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11356 on: May 30, 2024, 09:12:15 PM »
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6534
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11357 on: May 30, 2024, 09:13:38 PM »
So much winning. He must be sick of it.
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

*

Offline beardo

  • *
  • Posts: 5233
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11358 on: May 30, 2024, 09:26:07 PM »
This won't hurt him. His popularity and support is going to skyrocket after this and he will win in November. Bigly.
The Mastery.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6534
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #11359 on: May 30, 2024, 09:30:58 PM »
This won't hurt him. His popularity and support is going to skyrocket after this and he will win in November. Bigly.
I don't know about that. Certainly the cult members will just become more entrenched in their position that he's the messiah rather than a very naughty boy, it plays in to the narrative that the powers that be are out to get him (which I suspect is mostly true, but it's also true that Trump's behaviour has given them plenty of ammo).
But it may give people in the "anyone but Biden" camp pause.
Overall I still feel he probably will win the election, but I don't think his support will skyrocket - it will just make his cult following dig their heels in more.
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"